The interpretation of questions can change over time in turn affecting their answers. Books can often change opinions and give a different perspective of issues to the reader. An example of such is the book, Lord of the Flies by William Golding. Previously, if you had asked me questions such as: are humans inherently evil? Or is fear necessary in maintaining a society? I would have said that humans are not inherently evil and fear is never necessary, however now, I believe the exact opposite. Are humans inherently evil? This is a topic that is extremely prevalent in Lord of the Flies. In the story, the natural attraction to evil concepts is obvious with the children. The monster itself is the perfect example. There is nothing on the island …show more content…
Yes, for various reasons. Lord of the Flies present an excellent example of why fear is necessary. When Jack gained control, his group was more efficient and obedient than Ralphs. Ralph lacks the type of authority that the boys on the island need. “The world, that understandable and lawful world, was slipping away.” (5.227). In order to maintain the little they had left of the society before, the boys had to change their ways and rules to accommodate what they really need. What they need is the strict rule of Jack with consequences to keep everyone in line. This is also shown in a more subtle way of the average societies of today. The government sets up a strict set of rules to keep everyone safe and in control. When one steps out of line and breaks these laws, it is to be expected that they will receive a consequence equal to the action done. We even have an entire occupation devoted to controlling and monitoring the law and those who break it. If we had followed the passive leadership and rules of Ralph in The Lord of the Flies, there would be complete chaos and disobedience. Therefore, such as with Jack's group, fear is necessary to maintain a
It is a very arguable subject on whether or not people are born with good intentions, and therefore taught by others the ‘evil’ side of their personality. Whether it is the absence of ethical conduct in human nature, or just the way one perceives a situation, evil seems to be prominent in our everyday lives. Humans seem to have a moral code that follows them with every decision they make, yet despite the laws of morality and society, people of this world still seem to behave inhumanely because of the act of self-preservation, human interest, and who exactly the authority figure is at the time.
The novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding questions individuals whether humans are naturally good or evil. Throughout the novel, there are certain events and people that show humans are good. Not only is it shown in books but in real life too. Martin Luther King Jr. is a great example of this because what he did changed millions of lives and not in a bad way. As of the book, there are two characters that support the idea of humans being good. One of them is Simon and the other is Samneric. These two characters in Lord of the Flies help shape the answer of this question because the island never changed them. Humans have the choice of whether they want to turn evil or remain good. As seen by Simon and Samneric in Lord of the Flies by William
For centuries, psychologists and psychoanalysts have studied humans in hopes of discovering a common link, a pattern per say, in what provokes their certain thoughts and actions. Many question certain values, morals, religion, even their brain chemistry, but nobody knows for certain. Sigmund Freud’s theory suggests that human actions/personalities derive from three parts of the human psyche; the id, ego and superego. William Golding analyzes this further in his novel, Lord of the Flies, which is about a large group of boys that crash-land on a deserted Island after fleeing a dangerous England in the times of WWII. These young boys are used to entertain the idea of savagery vs. civilization and how evil lies deep within us all. After
In Lord Of The Flies by William Golding, Golding claims that no matter how civilized or innocent all human beings are, the surrounding environment can change how people interact with each other and turn them from civilized beings into savages. He uses Jack to show that when human nature does not have any restraints, it will slowly evolve into savagery. Jack at first is a respectful, civilized person that is willing to communicate and cooperate with Ralph, but when confronting with the act of killing a pig makes him lose all sense of shame and conscience, he starts acting evil and wanting to hunt Ralph. By the end of the novel, Golding ultimately shows that everyone is capable of being evil and it is only society’s rules that keep most individuals from acting out evil.
William Golding once asked “Are men are born evil, or does society create evil men?” This is shown by many actions that mankind has shown over many years including in the book Lord of the Flies. Some people think society creates evil men. If you get bad luck or something doesn't go your way, they think you turn evil. Men as long as we know have fought for power and wealth since the beginning of time. As seen in Lord of the Flies when they fight for power as soon as the get to the island. They also participate in the killing in one of there friends simon. In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, it clearly shows men are born evil. The boys just got to the island and were fighting for power as soon as they got there. Also the bullying and putting down of others. Lastly, wanting to kill and be cruel before their own well being.
The idea of humans are essentially good is supported by William Golding in Lord of the Flies through the characters of Ralph, Jack, and Roger, the idea is also supported by the help of a honorable man, Martin Luther King Junior. The character of Ralph proves humans are essentially good when he remains civil and stands alone against the other boys, fighting for the loss of innocence and civilization. Jack and Robert support the idea of humans essentially being good when Jack shows his first instinct is to create a civilization. Roger shows the same idea when he shows that he could not actually hurt one of the little luns, Henry, because he knows that intentionally hurting a little lun is wrong. Martin Luther King Junior also supports the same
The seven deadly sins stand as evils of humanity that a person should avoid, often representing the flaws of humans. Alternatively, morals can present themselves as ways to guide people towards a selfless path. After the events of WWII, Golding wrote Lord of the Flies out of his experiences during the war, claiming that evil was not an external compulsion, but an inherent force. In his novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding displays human nature as inherently evil. Contradictory to Golding’s views, human nature is characteristically good through compassion and humility.
In certain situations even the most delightful people could become evil. In the book Lord of the Flies by William Golding’s book takes place during world war II a plane full of british schoolboys crashes, the only survivors are the children. They attempt to form a type of government but two people want to be leaders. Ralph is suppose to be “chief” but Jack also wanted to be, later in the book he got his wish. They kill two of their friends and try to kill another. They eventually get rescued by a naval officer. Golding’s major argument throughout the novel is that evil is an inborn trait of mankind.
The Lord of the Flies by William Golding is tale of a group of young boys who become stranded on a deserted island after their plane crashes. Intertwined in this classic novel are many themes, most that relate to the inherent evil that exists in all human beings and the malicious nature of mankind. In The Lord of the Flies, Golding shows the boys' gradual transformation from being civilized, well-mannered people to savage, ritualistic beasts.
Do you think that humans are good or bad? Throughout history, it can be seen that humans have not always treated others kindly. Even though some humans act kind, there are still many ways humans are bad. I believe that humans are bad because of how they treat each other in the book and how people have treated each other throughout history.
Despite the progression of civilization and society's attempts to suppress man's darker side, moral depravity proves both indestructible and inescapable; contrary to culturally embraced views of humanistic tendencies towards goodness, each individual is susceptible to his base, innate instincts. In William Golding's Lord of the Flies, seemingly innocent schoolboys evolve into bloodthirsty savages as the latent evil within them emerges. Their regression into savagery is ironically paralleled by an intensifying fear of evil, and it culminates in several brutal slays as well as a frenzied manhunt. The graphic consequence of the boys' unrestrained barbarity, emphasized by the
This question is a difficult one to answer using the novel Lord of the Flies is hard because the Author William Golding wrote this book just after a time of war, his point of view is all humans are inherently evil; he uses the novel to express his feelings and what people are capable of. William Golding served in the British navy during world war two, during world war two he saw many horrific things even saying ’’man produces evil like bees produce honey.’’(William Golding). By William Golding saying things this shows what he thinks on the question are we inherently good or evil? And also expresses his answer throughout Lord of the
Humans have been around for about six million years. Humans have had their ups and their down. We have gained faith in humanity, yet we have lost faith in humanity. Which brings up the question, are humans inherently good or evil. The book Lord Of The Flies and documentary Promises clearly show how humans are inherently good. Humans are inherently good until they are changed because of the environment they are born in and how they are treated.
One of the themes of Lord of the Flies is that order is needed for humanity, and the absence of it results in the absence of what makes humans human. William Golding conveys this theme with the conch shell being order and eventually shattered, and the Beast being savagery and eventually growing in the hearts of every boy, except Simon. The conch shell opens as the attractor of the boys and the symbol of power that facilitates discussion and logic in the group, but, without it and it’s power the boys will “be like animals” (71); and animals they do become. As the Beast in the boys grow they soon deviate from humanity until “there were no words, and no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws”(118) on Simon’s corpse as he tries to be civil
James Madison once said, “If men were angels, no government would be necessary”. But men are not angels and there is a need for government, because men are not inherently good. Throughout the novel, Lord Of The Flies, William Golding successfully portrays his view of human nature as inherently evil by the actions and thoughts of the boys who are stranded on an island. The catholic church’s standpoint that human nature is inherently good is overpowered by William Golding’s view. William’s view is expressed throughout the Lord Of The Flies through the savagery in the book, the desire to kill/ hunt, and the loss of their innocence.