Questions:
1. What do you learn from Ben Leach’s article about the issues and concerns regarding the building of wind farms? (8 marks)
2. Explain how the headline and picture are effective and how they link to the text. (8 marks)
3. Explain some of the thoughts and feelings Claire Francis has during the storm. (8 marks)
4. Compare the different ways in which language is used for effect in the two texts. Give some examples and analyse the effects. (16 marks)
Answers:
1. From Leach’s article we learn that wind farms could detract from ‘one in six beauty spots’ around the U.K. Leach backs up this claim in his first paragraph, saying that out of 89 protected sites, due to their beautiful landscape, 14 have sought or had
…show more content…
This is mentioned in the text, ‘there are risks and we work methodically to reduce the risks.’
3. During the storm Claire Francis first of all feels tired, fed-up and in disbelief that it is happening again. She was ‘already exhausted’ and ‘feeling unprepared’. This shows that she wasn’t ready for the second storm because she hadn’t recovered from the first and it was slowly taking away her confidence.
All through the extract Claire Francis is full of hope and she keeps going with the strength inside of her. She was ‘full of anticipation; which shows she was also a bit excited about finding dry clothes because it was the only hope she had left and ‘every time’ presents the idea that she kept going and didn’t give up her search. She then ‘defied a wave’ which tells us just how strong and brave she must have been feeling at the time because she wanted to look after the only dry clothes she had by ‘carefully’ hanging them as if her life depended on it, which she probably thought it did at the time.
She began to feel disheartened; when she says her ‘heart sank further and further’. This tells us that she was feeling disappointed and felt that she should give up but by telling herself that one day life would ‘feel life was approximately a hundred times better’ it kept her going because she thought it would be over at some point and her life would then improve.
Francis also began to think it was the end and doubted that
With these risks highlighted then reduction of risk, both positive and negative can be identified.
We cannot protect bad risks or dismiss all our losses, but we can diminish them for minimal business impact; allowing us to soar over risks of fines and lawsuits. Let me break this down a little more:
date, and that a new risk management plan must be developed. Because of the importance of risk
At the beginning all she did was dwell on the past. She thought about all the friends she lost and family and more. Like when it said in the story “They Moved to Cincinnati, where for a month she spent the greater part of every day in a room full of beveled glass windows, sifting through photographs of the life she’d lived and left behind.’’ it just showed how stuck in the past she was. She literally spent a month in her room looking at pictures. Like nothing gets better if you just don't try and hide from your problems. So nothing did get better until one day at the supermarket.
However, when she went to her room alone to compose herself, she felt a bit have happiness as she realized she could be free. She had great hope for her new future where she would not be held back by someone and could do anything she wanted. Before her husband had supposedly died, she did not want to live a long life, but with this new freedom, she wanted to live for a long time to
To her, life was like an encompassing doom. It was bleak and she hates every second of it. Falling asleep hoping to get better and waking up still feeling the same is like a routine to her. She has to keep face and put up a strong front, putting on a mask and pretend that her life is perfect and that she is in fact happy.
If a risk has been identified then it needs to be acted upon so as to minimise the level of risk involved. If this is not done then there is a higher level of risk and more chance of a negative outcome.
After researching about the pros and cons for ocean wind farms, these are the facts that I had came up.
Everyone can agree climate change is real but not everyone agrees whether it is an issue that needs solving. One side of the argument states that the rate of climate change is worrying and that this is caused by the mass burning of fossil fuels. Whatever a person 's stance on the topic is they both agree that mass use of fossil fuels are unsustainable. Research into renewable energy sources has been done at exponential rates every year. This research has led to the argument of which renewable source is the most effective. Two lead candidates for this spot is Wind and Hydropower. Each one of these sources has trade-offs when it comes to reliability, energy output, and environmental impact but both energy sources would work better together.
One other environmental factor regarding wind turbines, especially the wind farms, is that “erecting and maintaining wind turbines can also necessitate clearing land: ridgeline installations often require a fair amount of deforestation, and then there's the associated clearing for access roads, maintenance facilities, and the like”. (7) Although we are trying to help the environment by creating a safer and cleaner source of energy, the actions of clearing our forests, and whatever ecosystem that lived in that forest, in order to save the environment appears to be an oxymoron. “But there are also now a great many turbines situated on farmland, where the fields around their bases are still actively farmed”. (8)
I believed the government should encourage environmental protectionism, including offering incentives for renewable energy, and advancing a cultural shift towards a more eco-friendly mindset. In theory, if the government relied less on resources like fossil fuels, and encouraged investment in offshore wind farms, the world would be a better place. However, my debate coach always reminds me, every solution holds a consequence. My solution to coal generated electricity was offshore wind farms. Undoubtedly, the wind turbines could generate electricity, reduce global warming, and produce jobs. It was a marvelous, one-sided plan, that missed the other side of the debate. The nuances I later discovered affected my precious wind farm idea. For example, although humans may profit from offshore wind farms, there is a great chance of damaging marine life and ocean biodiversity. Ironically, in an effort to improve the environment, there is a chance that the attempt could devastate it. Although I begrudgingly acknowledged the harms, this discourse was essential to develop my understanding of the issue. Subsequently, I carried on the determination to discuss the flipside in order to expand my knowledge.
Article: James Nash, 2008, Advantages and Disadvantages of Wind Power, viewed on October 1, 2011, retrieved from: http://jamesnash.articlebase.com/environment-articles/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-wind-power-535693.html
In Folbre’s article the author brings up a very good point, if we were to look at the new wind farms as a good thing we can realize that the wind farms are helping people get jobs and also help save the environment by creating more “green” energy. Although, in the words of Gulen, written by Lomborg: “respected individuals do not always see the new jobs as a good thing: “Gulen concluded that job creation ‘cannot be defended as another benefit’ of well-meaning green policies.” (Lomborg). In Lomborg’s article the author referred to the college professor Gulen as someone who did not agree with the new jobs. Gulen’s statement was not truly correct because the new jobs created would be a benefit because it allows people who don’t have jobs to get jobs from the people who decide to leave their current job to go work at the wind farms. Either way, the wind farms are a win-win for people and jobs; however, there will be a moment in time when the economy falls because of the people leaving their current jobs, but there will be a rise in the economy because as one job gets lost two more jobs can get filled, a job at the wind farms and a job at the place where the position was vacated. The jobs that are being added are a good addition to the
no guarantee that risks are being controlled and will not lead to injuries or ill
Global warming has turned itself into a global issue. While turning back the clock is impossible, slowing down the accelerated effects of global warming is not. Reducing our carbon emissions and our carbon footprint will greatly reduce the stress we have placed on the world’s ecosystems. Renewable energy has become an ever increasing important solution, but that does not mean that any kind of renewable energy is the outright solution. Wind farms have the capability of producing large amounts of power, but it has several glaring drawbacks including cost, space efficiency, noise, and wind. These huge wind farms do nothing if the wind is not blowing, which is a huge problem. The turbines are so loud that no one can live nearby, forcing these farms to be placed on farmground or hills, away from everyone. Pouring millions of dollars into a massive wind farm takes a large portion of land for turbines that may only turn half the time. While wind power may not be the energy solution of the future, hydropower just might be. Hydropower is not without its drawbacks, though. Huge dams cost millions of dollars, and the reservoirs they create can destroy acres upon acres of land. This was a major concern when the Shasta Dam was built, as it destroyed much of the sacred land of the Winnemem Tribe during World War II. According to Winnemem Wintu, “The Winnemem not only lost our villages on the McCloud River when the Shasta Dam was erected during WWII, we also lost many of our sacred places