Animal Testing: Torturing Animals By Testing Medicine On Them

The bad use of animal testing is cruel but also sometimes ineffective. “Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia. Instead, signs of these diseases are artificially induced in animals in laboratories in an attempt to mimic the

Animal Testing is uncertain and hard. Animals go through a series of tests are very painful, most of the time they are not even given anything for pain. Some product tests require the same painful procedure on a daily basis over a weeks' time. Most tests on animals cause permanent injury or even death. The tests performed on animals are not always reliable. A medicine that may be safe with animals may not be for human beings. For example, aspirin is toxic to cats, so if we were to test this medication on cats, it would not help to determine if this was a safe product for human beings. One alternative to animal testing is human testing, if we are looking to find out if the product works on humans, we should test them on humans. That case "No

There is no alternative that works as good as animal testing. “Pro Con Arguments” says that studying a smaller cell in a petri dish is sometimes useful but is not as helpful as testing on an actual complex structure, like an animal. They also say that animals must be used to prevent the need of using humans as subjects. When testing medicines that could cause harm or fatal events, humans should not be at risk of injury or in some cases, death. ¨American women use an average of 12 personal care products a day, so product safety is of great importance.¨ Animal testing is needed for these products to ensure the safety of the consumers.

In archaic medical training courses, pigs and dogs are cut open and killed and cats and ferrets have hard plastic tubes forced down their delicate throats.” Animal testing isn’t even 100 % accurate, because animal’s biological makeup is different than our own, and the results are usually misleading. Testing is required for certain drugs, vaccines, chemicals, cosmetics, and other products we use on our bodies, or put in our bodies. Most tests kill over 2,000 animals every time they are used.

Animals are different from humans therefore the results will be inaccurate. Just because a drug passes animal testing doesn't mean that

Have you ever lost a loved one or even heard of someone passing away from a preventable disease that could’ve been stopped if the medicine to cure them was tested? About 21,000 people died around the world today from preventable illnesses. That number can easily be reduced to a much smaller number if doctors and scientists had the capability to test medications on animals. However, some argue that making an animal suffer is terrible, who would you rather want suffering? Your best friend? Or a random rat or mouse? The choice is yours. Animal testing should be used because, it can save lives, there is no other way to test the medicine properly and they help us to figure out what to change in the medicine so that it works the next time.

Also animal testing normally will not yield the same results it would on humans. (Zurolo 3) Not only that, animal based tests take too long & are expensive on average. One such case where a drug was safe for animals but not for humans was a drug called Vioxx. In 2005 ,researchers found the drug had a heart protective effect in mice & other animals but the exact opposite in humans and caused heart problems. Once they found out that it caused heart problems in humans they ignored this very fact and instead pointed to the animal tests insisting it was “safe” and the evidence is there. (news -

These tests are not always accurate because we have different reactions and DNA. 92% of the experimental drugs that appear safe and seem to work in animals tend to be extremely harmful in humans and can even cause death.

There are numerous studies that document the failure of animal testing. Scientific studies have documented failures of animal testing, which is not surprising given the many differences that exist between human and animal species in terms of their anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, and metabolism. Although animal testing has helped us, it has also led us down countless scientific dead ends, while detracting attention and funds from more applicable scientific techniques. In reality, animal research never guarantees that medications and other products will be safe and effective for us humans. Most drugs that were previously tested on other animals have been pulled off the market because they caused severe illness or death in human patients (France

Animal testing has been dated all the way back to ancient times (Skutti). Out of curiosity, Greek, Roman, and Arab scientists all implemented experiments on animals (Skutti). In fact, “An Arab physician of the 12th Century, Ibn Zuhr (or Avenzoar) tested surgical procedures on animals before applying them to human patients (Skutti).” Now, in the 21st century, most animal testing is used for medicines. Medicine should not be tested on animals because many people have died due to the fact that the person taking an antibiotic or

Animal testing has been going on since the time of the Ancient Greeks. These experiments still continue to occur even today, these poor defenseless animals are injected and exposed to painfully deadly diseases so that science can observe the symptoms, and the progression. It has been shown that animal testing does not provide adequate information on how they will affect a human. “Laboratory animals do not have anything like the same biology as humans. Yet although animal toxicity tests have never been scientifically validated to determine whether they can effectively predict toxicity for humans, a mind-boggling array of animal-based data now fill toxicology manuals, textbooks, and computer databases”(Fano 24). Animal testing is simply laziness, and is

Members of PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) suggested that animals are not the same as humans so there is no logical reason to why they should test products on animals. Obviously there are differences between animals and people. Under

Many lives of animals are being used for the sake of testing, these species do not belong in laboratories, locked in a small cage or on a table with needles stuck into them. Animal testing is a phrase referred to a group of founders preforming on alive animals for many purposes of studies to find potency of new medical profits. According to Ian Murnaghsan, (2016). All performers, even the ones that are restricted as delicate, have the ability to cause the animal feel agenizing pain and suffering. Because of the amount of pain they put the animals under, they are most likely to end up getting killed or die from the unbearable abuse. There is a different amount of animals that get used for animal testing, but mostly mice, monkeys, and pigs. Shockingly,

Although it may seem like animals are accurate to test on because humans and animals share so many similarities that is not true in all cases. There are many anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between humans and animals which can greatly affect the results of tests (procon.org, May 24, 2016). Humans have a much more complicated body than a fish or mouse so therefore you get two different test outcomes. For example, rats are the species most commonly used in animal tests and they have no gall bladder, they breathe through their nose, they are nocturnal, and their skin has different skin absorptive properties and drugs bind to rat plasma much less efficiently. All of these characteristic will alter drug results and can mislead scientists.

In the first place, animals should not be tested on because most testings that are approved on humans are NOT approved on humans. For instance, the website states “The food and drug test administration reported 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass