1. What have the museum curators identified as the central theme of this exhibit? Explain how curators understand this topic, its causes, and its consequences. How is this particular interpretation reflected in the exhibit? (Give specific examples). [10 points, 1 paragraph] The central theme of the exhibit focuses on a period of time that they call the Anthropocene, a proposed epoch that is defined by humanity’s effects on the environment. The curators take a multi-disciplinary approach to the topic by looking to geology, biology, and climate science to draw stronger conclusions. They also ask for visitor feedback in several parts of the exhibit to gauge a social level of the impacts. Specifically, the exhibit displays the preserved bodies of several different extinct animals and explains how humans were directly responsible for their …show more content…
The information was believable because you had direct examples of human intervention staring back at you as you read about how humans were in some way responsible for their decline and demise. 3. What was the most striking item/object/text in this exhibit to you? Why? [10 points, 1 paragraph] The most striking object in the exhibit was the Stephens Island wren, a small flightless songbird that lived on a tiny island in New Zealand. It was discovered the same year that it was declared extinct, because of a pregnant cat that was brought to the island by a human living in the lighthouse on the island. Seeing this unique little songbird wiped out totally by accident really drove the point home that much of human impact on the environment is totally accidental. 4. What is a potential “hole” or omission in this exhibit? This is a broad question – it can be a particular item or object; a type of evidence; an audience; a theme or topic, etc. [15 points, 2-3
In the article “EMP: Music History or Music Trivia?”, Jackie Wyngaard gives her point of view of the Experience Music Project (EMP), an artistic installation in Seattle (WA), that holds information and memorabilia about the various music movements through the American history. Based on what she believes that a music museum should be, she claims that the space is a failure. That is the first important element of an essay: an idea or point of view over something that the author judges important. The purpose of an essay is to inform, clearly, what that idea is, bringing arguments that will support that claim. And the author does that by bringing evidences of what a museum should be for her.
The fifth area of the exhibit is called winter lodge. This shows how the elders of the Anishinabe have stories that have been told and songs that have been composed about how reliable they are. Families of the Anishinabek had to repair and forge new tools for hunting, trapping, fishing, gathering crops, and other activities. In the Ziibiwing center I saw some stone weapons and tools displayed in a protected
While the exhibition had its fair share of people who supported it, a large group of individuals did not, and they were not afraid to make their voices heard. The issue at hand was the way the objects had historically been possessed and controlled. The artefacts had been collected through the military; they were responsible for stripping African countries of anything and everything they deemed valuable, even religious idol and sacred objects. ‘Collectively, they left nothing in Africa which struck them as valuable’. And so since the artefacts remained in the possession of the more dominant peoples, the objects were not able to tell the true story, they were being limited as it was being told through the lens of Dr. David Livingstone, a
When reviewing above mentioned RA show, The Pottery and Glass Record expressed the opinion that Vyse’s third exhibit The Macaw (RA1480).
“Newberry Library: Lewis and Clark Exhibit.” Newberry Library: Lewis and Clark Exhibit, publications.newberry.org/lewisandclark/brilliantplan/gifts/weyekin.html. Accessed 1 Apr. 2017.
The museum presents its exhibits in a dark, gloomy atmosphere to show how (according to them) a world ruled by non-believers looks like. As the authors take the reader on a tour through the museum in their book, they pose critical questions that reveal the museum’s exhibits as non-objective. In doing so, the mechanisms and superficial solutions of the museum are exposed. The Wonders of Creation room features videos from animals that should prove that an intelligent designer is behind them: A bird is equipped with wings because its design should enable it to fly. Its beauty and complexity, according to the exhibit, reveals the creator behind it. Here, the authors stop and ponder several questions, e.g.: If the bird and its wings stand for beauty, and the whole creation is based on it – what about ugliness? Does ugliness result from sin (and what is considered to be ugly)? The flaws in the museum’s line of argumentation (omission of information, subjective presentation of topics and exhibits) become entirely
This shows that the museum is built around the totem pole and, therefore, the workers do not have ownership of the totem pole and the right to remove it. Walter Hooton, more often than any other worker, tries to get the totem pole out of the museum. His reason for removal of the totem pole is that, ““this totem pole is not part of the show, and we need to move it someplace else”” (King 14). This further demonstrates the dominating nature that the museum workers feel they have over the seemingly problematic totem pole. Rather than embracing the totem pole, the workers want to remove it as it does not fit into their vision of the rest of the exhibit. Coincidently, this is how the Canadian government treated the Indigenous people of Canada by trying to assimilate and potentially abolish them from our history. The museum workers believe they have dominance over the totem pole and with each attempt to destroy it, in time, it grows back stronger than the last. Another example of the controlling nature of the museum’s workers is that even though the basement of the museum was overcrowded it did not stop the workers from continuing to relocate the old totem poles in the storage room. This example is a parallel to how the Canadian government treated the Indigenous people when they were forcefully removed from their homes and relocated to inadequate housing often separated from their families. On their fourth attempt to rid the
On Friday, March 31, a observation study was conducted at the L.A. Zoo. The time of arrival for the observation was at 11:48 am and the end of the observation was at 2:42 pm. The weather condition at the zoo was very sunny with a mild gust of wind every so often, which is a perfect weather condition to conduct a study. The main reason for conducting this observation study was to study and gather information about the many different types of primate that are located at the zoo. To see how different or similar each primate is to one anotherin different aspects.
As I walked into the first gallery, I saw a wood sculpture that stood in the
In order to study human development and perform naturalistic observation I went to the mall. I selected a 9-year-old white girl as the subject for my observation. I observed the subject for 30 minutes. During my observation the subject was not interrupted and was not aware of my study.
This paper is going to describe the behavioral and cognitive traits that can be inferred from that behavior of a two year old child that I observed in the park as she was playing with her mother. The child that I observed is a girl, has blonde hair and is physically well-developed for her age. She is around two, weighs approximately twenty (20) pounds and is about two (2) feet tall.
Last week I had the opportunity to visit the Los Angeles zoo on a beautiful, sunny Thursday (October 19th). Although I arrived off schedule which left a minimal amount of time to observe primates, I managed my time well. After being told that the larger animals get put away earlier, I figured my first stop would be at an ape enclosure. The ape I chose to see that day was the gorilla. The time that I began my observation was at approximately 3:05. At that time only one ape was quite visible and he was sitting at the front making eye contact with me making it seem as if he is HABITUATED. Next, post gorilla watching, I had the chance to take a gander at the ring railed lemurs at 3:40. These prosimians all had their own personalities which interested me deeply. Lastly, and certainly not least on my journey through the LA zoo, I had the chance of looking at the mandrills which were once classified as baboons. Considering that two baby mandrills were present and only a month old, this was my favorite exhibit to see because of their high energy and randomness of actions.
Animal Intelligence Intelligence is defined as the ability to acquire and apply knowledge. Psychologists have exploited this concept in many ways to try and determine whether non-human animals are capable of intelligence. From social learning it is logical to assume that, since non-human animals are able to both acquire and use new behaviours, they must be intelligent in some way. Heyes stated that there are 6 types of behaviour which suggest intelligence. These are imitation, self-recognition, social relationship formation, role-taking, deception and perspective taking.
The first exhibit I encountered was the black bears. Their thick, glistening fur was reflecting the light on and off as they paced the entire patch of land. Walking back and forth, the bears footprints could be seen in the dirt as they slowly wove a path into the land. One bear was just lying around in the blistering sun barely moving. No trees, no bushes, and no pools of water to allow the animals to cool down. The more I looked, the more I noticed how barren the display was. I couldn’t stop thinking how sad the entire place looked when I compared it to the bears’ natural habitat, how artificial the habitat probably seemed to the bears, and how in most cases this life was the only one the bears would ever know. There was just a round prison with limited space, in which three enormous bears lived. Most bears in the wild are solitary creatures who only come together for mating season, but here they were forced to spend all day with each other. Forcing myself to continue, I made my way to the the tigers.
Animal experimentation by scientists can be cruel and unjust, but at the same time it can provide long term benefits for humanity. Animals used in research and experiments have been going on for 2,000 years and keep is going strong. It is a widely debated about topic all over the world. Some say it is inhuman while others say it’s for the good of human kind. There are many different reasons why people perform experiments and why others total disagree with it.