Many people remember President Jackson as a hero changing ideas and supporting the “common man”. In the early 1800s, Jackson ran for president but lost. He ran again in 1828 and won. He was reelected in 1832 and won by a landslide. Jackson shifted the power from legislative and judicial branches to the executive branch. One way he influenced the shift of power was with the effects of the court case of Worcester vs. Georgia. In the case of Worcester vs. Georgia, Jackson disagreed with the court and went his own way, going against the law and taking the power for himself. The Native Americans were forced out of Georgia, their home, and moved to Oklahoma against their will. The Cherokee were dragged thousands of miles away from their home at gun point after they won the court case. Jackson’s job was to enforce the law but he refused and the Cherokee were forced out. Document #3 is a report from the court case Worcester vs. Georgia. “The court ruled in the Cherokee’s favor… President Jackson refused to enforce the verdict…” (Doc #3). This document is unbiased because it states the reason for actions on both sides. Jackson’s …show more content…
They thought his ideas were based on his own greed for power and not the greater good of the country. The group of people that disliked Jackson were called the “Whigs”. The Whigs called Jackson “King Andrew the First” because they thought he turned the government to a monarchy. Document #2 is a cartoon that appeared during the presidential election of 1832. The purpose was to try and sway people’s opinions so he would not get reelected. This document shows Jackson wearing a royal robe, crown, and holding a scepter. The robe, crown, and scepter represents Jackson ruling the country in a monarchy. Clearly the artist behind this cartoon is part of the Whigs group. Although many people liked Jackson as president, some thought he ruled taking the power from legislative and judicial to
Andrew Jackson, seventh president of the United States of America, can be debated as either a good president or bad president. But if one were to weigh out the positives and negatives of Andrew Jackson’s presidency, one would realize that his positives outweigh his negatives for a variety of historic facts. Andrew Jackson was a good president because he represented the majority of America’s people by being a common, prevented a civil war when South Carolina threatened to secede from the nation, and because he technically found or instigated the two major parties used in America today (Democratic and Republican). Many Jackson oppositionists despise him because of he is a hypocrite, however America was founded on hypocrisy so as an
Going against the Supreme Court, which is the supreme law of the land, in the Worcester vs Georgia case demonstrates how Andrew Jackson abused his power as president. John Marshall, the chief justice at the time, ruled that the United States did not have possession or legal jurisdiction over Native American land, and no individual states had authority in Native American affairs. However, Jackson went above this, since the court did not order marshals to enforce it. In the Indian Removal packet, it was stated that in May 1830, Jackson signed the Indian removal act to exchange land with Native Americans. To do this, he coerced tribe leaders, sometimes by getting them drunk or high, into signing away their land through removal treaties. In the
Jackson’s enforcement of the Indian Removal Act and the spoils system is undemocratic. The Indian Removal Act forcibly displaced Native American tribes from their ancestral lands, contradicting democratic principles of fairness and respect for all individuals. Additionally, the spoils system, which involved
Friend or foe? Despite having many opinions, not even the most experienced historian knows Andrew Jackson’s true political and social motives. Jackson, as a young boy, grew up poor with minimal formal education. He fought in many wars for the United States; including the War of 1812 where he gained popularity after winning the Battle Of New Orleans. He first ran for president in 1824; although he had plurality in both the popular vote and the electoral vote he didn’t have majority. So, The House ended up choosing his opponent, John Quincy Adams, over him. But, later in 1828 he won the election by a landslide and continued to serve for two terms. Andrew Jackson- A democratic supporter of the people or a tyrant? Was he in favor of political and social equality for all or in search for oppressive power? Andrew Jackson was a democratic supporter of the people because he supported suffrage expansion for the common man, wanted a direct democracy of the people as well as, going against the Supreme Court in order to support a popular law.
The early activity of Andrew Jackson and his election of to the presidency in 1828 led to the new changes in the society and politics of the United States. Answer Jackson is known for:
Andrew Jackson should be remembered as a president known for creating crises because he was the reason for the Trail of Tears and killing the B.U.S. In 1820 thousands of Native Americans were peacefully living east of the Mississippi River. That was until white settlers wanted to expand by taking over Native American land. The Worcester v. Georgia Supreme Court was a discussion of the Cherokee’s land. Andrew Jackson and the Supreme Court differed on the Cherokee’s claims of their lands. According to Document B; “John Marshall has made his decision… now let him enforce it”, John Marshall was supporting the Cherokees to keep their lands. This quote refers to Jackson ignoring John Marshall’s ruling and sending troops anyways. In 1830, Congress
As America’s most influential political figure during the 1830s, Andrew Jackson left a permanent imprint upon American politics and democracy. Born on the border of North and South Carolina, Jackson was left to confront the world on his own after the death of his parents. By the age of 29, he involved himself in law and politics as he was elected as Tennessee’s first representative in the U.S. Senate. Jackson’s first success came from war, specifically when he commanded American forces in the defense of New Orleans against the British in 1815. Soon after, Jackson decided to make his first run for the President of the United States and won both the electoral and popular vote in 1824. Jackson is often connected to a new spirit of democracy
When Jackson came to power in 1829 he promised much, advocating equality, democratic change, morality in government and true representation. However Jackson's success or failure as a president is shown by what he actually did. The thesis of this essay is that despite the variety of issues faced by Jackson he didn't actually bring about much change. This could be interpreted as failure but his legacy as a strong president, as a symbol of US democracy, and also the devotion of the people to him, does perhaps counter the failings. Failure might constitute not meeting one's promises but Jackson's ambiguity and inconsistency on many issues make it hard to judge his performance. I would not say he was completely successful or unsuccessful but
Andrew Jackson was probably one of the most powerful and influential presidents during his time at the white house. He was hated, yet loved by many. Jackson was an American soldier, who gained fame as a general in the U.S and served in both houses of Congress. He was soon elected the seventh president of the United States. After Jackson took charge, he wanted immediate change as to how the government was being run. For starters, he came with a new idea of voting. Allowing the common people to vote for whom they believe was the right person for the job. Before the introduction to
The election of Andrew Jackson in 1828 and his ensuing presidency marked a turning point in American democracy. Jackson established the presidential campaign, made the executive branch more powerful than the legislative, and reestablished political parties.
The United States government needed to become more democratic during the Age of Jackson because of the type of president that Andrew Jackson was. Even though Andrew Jackson changed voting – in most states – to be more democratic (DBQ-document 1), he was responsible for the Trail of Tears in the late 1830s. The Trail of Tears was the removal of a great deal of Native Americans of differing tribes from the eastern part of America to the west, which was unfamiliar to these people. This harrowing presidential decision made by Andrew Jackson is just one of the many examples that gives historians a representation of how undemocratic Andrew Jackson was. Jackson also appointed an important government job to Samuel Swartwout, a corrupt and untrustworthy man, because Jackson was an early supporter of Swartwout. Jackson was advised to refuse Swartwout of the job; however, Jackson’s biased attitude towards Swartwout was the reason that “Swartwout absconded with $1,222,705.09” (DBQ-document 7). Andrew Jackson is depicted more as a dictator or a king rather than a president. The Library of Congress has a picture of Andrew Jackson that gives the viewer an idea of his character throughout his presidency. In this picture, he is dressed as a king and the picture is captioned as “King Andrew the First”; he
Historians just can't seem to agree about Andrew Jackson. Some see him as a hero; others believed he was a villain. Some people view him as a supporter of the “common man” who backed citizens individual rights, promoted expanded suffrage and who fought to keep the union strong. Others view him as a tyrant who ignored the supreme court by signing the Indian removal act and who denied the people the laws passed by their representatives,vetoing more laws than any president before him. Did Andrew Jackson support the ideas of the people or was he a tyrant that was a cruel and oppressive ruler? Andrew Jackson is a democratic supporter of the people because he had respect for the people, supported expanded suffrage, and gave the people power and wealth.
Although the “Age of Jackson” wasn’t a time era, which brought forth a great political, social, or economic freedom and equality to the U.S., it did in fact put our country through a metamorphosis in our political lives of the nation. The start of a new presidency (Jackson’s presidency) was accompanied by huge numbers of Hickoryites (Jacksonian supporters) and official hopefuls. Many of these hopefuls were granted their desire of holding office, which is one of the changes brought into Washington by Andrew Jackson.
Andrew Jackson was the seventh president, serving from 1829-1837. Nicknamed "Old Hickory," he left an indelible imprint on the nation that extends beyond his face adorning the twenty dollar bill. Jackson split the preexisting Republican Party into the Whig and Democratic Parties, establishing the dual-party structure that exists today. He was the first president who came from a rural, deep Southern background (he was born in the rustic woods of South Carolina) and his impoverished country upbringing informed his presidential policies. As someone who also captained the premier national political position, Jackson is responsible for bringing the experience and voice of the common man to the federal government. This essay will explore three of the most salient aspects of Jackson's presidency: the Nullification Crisis of 1832, the National Bank episode of 1833-34, and the treatment of American Indians and slaves.
Andrew Jackson, whose presidential term lasted from 1829-1837, was the first president to ever be chosen by the people to lead. Because he was not born into a rich family, people felt that they could relate to him better. He too preferred supporting the common public over the wealthy aristocrats. During Jackson’s period in office he was able to shift the majority of power in the United States to farmers and small businesses in the western part of the country. Jackson vetoed many bills in order to benefit common people and also created the spoils system to balance out his cabinet. Like Jefferson, Jackson was extremely opposed to the Bank of the U.S., believing that it would only make the wealthy even