preview

Andrew Coulson's Argument On Teacher Unions

Decent Essays

A teacher union is an association of teaching professionals who work to secure their rights and interests. The first thing that pops into my head when I hear “teacher unions,” is that they are beneficial not only to teachers, but also students and families. Being protected and having stable conditions is given to the families of both the students and teachers. It is to be true that teacher unions help to have a positive influence on the academic performance of the students, additionally, the quality of public education. Currently, not all will be certain that this is true, but in Taking Sides it goes in depth on whether teacher unions are positively and/or negatively affecting schooling. Andrew Coulson argues that yes teacher unions stymie school reforms, whereas Louis Malfaro argues that no teacher unions are absolutely influencing the improvements of teaching and learning positively. Both Coulson and Malfaro have significant points to back up this argument on what they believe about teacher unions.
“A Less Perfect Union,” is the section title of Andrew Coulson’s argument as to why teacher unions stymie school reforms. Coulson begins by talking about the cost the National Education Association, known as NEA, and the American Federation of Teachers, known as AFT. The NEA and AFT both have increased in cost since they started recording in the year 1970. Unfortunately, the price of sending a child to school beginning from kindergarten to twelfth grade has almost tripled. Since 1970, the price has gone up from $55,000 to approximately $155,000 in the public school system (Coulson, 2011). During this time period as the costs inclined, but the quality of education, specifically in math and reading became stagnated. Also unfortunately, quality of science has declined. Meanwhile, this money has to be going elsewhere, there has now been growth in employment, which is expanding ten times faster than student enrollment. “It is now costing us more to teach less,” (Coulson, 200). This specific sentence had caught my eye the most from this reading. Why would we support teacher unions if they are taking away so much money? If productivity was kept the same as in 1970, American taxpayers would have saved around 300 billion

Get Access