and there isn’t a clear answer to which side holds the better ideas. While the research should be very dependable, I don’t always think it is. Often, studies don’t have a big enough sample size and are dictated by the bias in only one geographical area, or even limited to just one classroom. I also think the instructors are also biased by their own views on non-English speakers. I was stunned by the statistic 82.5% of teachers polled in that study (Reeves 2006) thought that English should be made the United States’ official language. If these teachers hold that belief, it directly correlated to their views on how classroom instruction should be structured. They would be more likely to believe that student’s native languages should not be …show more content…
Not all students have the same needs, but do institutions take that into account, or do they try to create a “one size fits all” solution? Of course, research does take on this question in a general way, but do not include generation 1.5 students into their analysis. My community partner engagement took place at Moder Patshala. I’ve really enjoyed the experience, especially since I get to work with the same group of students very week. What I find the most meaningful is the connections I’ve made. On my first day, I was challenged when I worked with a student who spoke very little English. We were doing science, which was heavily reading based, and she was very shy. At first, I had other students translating what I was saying, but I decided that it wasn’t direct enough. So, I pulled out my phone and started using google translate. As we moved through the worksheet, the student became much more responsive and confident in the work. After that first session, I realized how important building trust was with these students. Even though my commitment was once a week, they came to Moder Patshala everyday, and everyday they worked with different people. In order to be an effective resource to them, I needed to get to know them and show them that I’m committed to them and their success. This attitude has made all of the difference in my work. Now, when I walk in on Tuesdays, the same group
She maintains this will allow them to generate cognitive and linguistic progress that nurtures their transition to English (Stover, 2015). Therefore, according to Dr. Vonderlack-Navarro, the “English only” approach can be detrimental to learning English (Stover, 2015). Vonderlack-Navarro contends school board members need to endorse specific strategies and support multilingual classrooms in response to the question, “How does the school board make these literacy gains in a classroom with English language learners who speak different languages?” (Stover, 2015).
This was extremely sad and portrayed a painful picture of how slaves were treated and the emotional turmoil they endured while living as slaves. The protagonist discusses how she was a victim of sexual violence, be treated by her master and her mistress, how slavery made her lose her innocence and they ability to feel safe.The protagonist discusses how she was a victim of sexual violence,betrayed by her master and her mistress, how slavery made her lose her innocence ad the ability to feel safe.She described how she lived in fear of reprimands from her master should she reveal his sexual request to her. Slavery affected southern society because the white women born to the slave owner had to watch their husbands do as they wish with
The problem with both bilingual education and English-as-a-second language instruction in the United States lies in our unwillingness to treat English for non-speakers as an academic subject (Haas, 2007). While the bilingual programs in California are thought to be mostly for people who speak Spanish, there are also Asian students that need to be taught proper English before continuing their education. As one anonymous teacher points out: "I have had 32 different languages spoken in my classroom over a 25-year period. Eighty-four languages are spoken in our district."(Anon 1998 & Haas 2007). Which for most teachers mean that it is both educationally and economically impossible to teach every student in their own native language.
The great thing about America, is that it’s a country that accepts people of all different cultures as citizens of the country. This is a distinguishing quality that no other country in the world shares. By having this unique quality, it drew in nearly every imaginable kind of person to this country, a country with just one primary language, English. With that came hundreds of new languages spoken by the immigrants. To this day there’s still people who isolate themselves within their ethnic groups, instead of learning to speak English, the most prevalent language used in America. There’s something to be said for learning at least a little of a language whether someone is visiting a country for a day or planning to live there for the rest of their life. It shows that person cares about the place they’re in, and that they respect its residents. According to Brice, “Making English the official language would encourage new migrants to learn the language of the country they have adopted as theirs. The end goal is to unite the American people, while improving the lives of immigrants and native born inhabitants.” Speaking and
The article “English Only” Laws divide and Demean by Warren Blumenfeld states the author’s view against enacting a law making English the official language of the federal government. Mr. Blumenfeld’s premise in "English Only" is that the law is unnecessary and divisive in the United States. He is seeking a call to action in his home state of Iowa against the “English -only” law because he believes that it will negatively impact the beliefs that our nation is founded upon, rather than celebrate and promote our uniqueness as a nation of people from different cultures seeking the freedom to be individuals. He is an opponent of this law since he believes it has the potential to create prejudice and discrimination toward our citizens because
There is no argument that students will do better academically when the school provides material and instruction according to the native language. For school districts that deal with one other language like Spanish that requirement should not be extremely difficult to accomplish. However, not all school district are not alike. For example, Spanish makes up only 23% of the TOP TEN languages that students speak in our district (Anchorage School District). Hmong comes in at 21% (Anchorage School District). Just between those two languages you still are under fifty percent mark. Add to the mix, the ten percent that the district classifies as “other” which could include anything like Arabic, Hungarian, Japanese, Chinese, and not to mention
“Language is power. If you cannot understand or be understood you have no power. You are at the mercy of everyone.” – (Rudat, 1994, Stow, Dodd 356) Should Americans be required to learn Spanish as a second language? The construction of our nation stands on documents written in English, however English is not our official language nor has it ever been. America is a “melting pot” in which English is the most prominent language, followed closely by Spanish. Requiring Americans to learn Spanish is a great controversy; I strongly believe that it should be a requirement, because it improves academic achievements, career success, and cultural and social understanding. The controversy has great counter arguments such as the double standard Americans are held to, and further division of the country. Regarding the counterarguments, I still firmly believe that it should be a requirement because the integration of a second language in our schools is more beneficial to our country’s success as a whole.
There are millions of people traveling between the U.S. and other countries each year, each person bringing and taking our culture and theirs with them. If we were to make English the official language to be spoken, it would cause many people to feel unwanted or in other words unwelcome and cause them to not +want to stay or visit with us. So if we were to tell them that they needed to change and learn a new language that is like taking away who they are and where they are from. Many people argue that, if they choose to come to this country, they should choose to learn its language. Anywhere you go the people from that country expect anyone to learn that countries language due to respect on coming. "If I were going to Mexico" they say, "I would expect to learn Spanish." This argument ignores two important aspects about immigration
I also believe that students should have every option explained and available to them so that they may continue to educate themselves. I find it astounding that most students do not understand that there are other ways to attain success other than the traditional high school to college route.
However, for the nontraditional student, this is hardly ever the case, and that it’s likely constraining these assumptions to a student will not motivate any type of success (Vega and Moore 20).
Teachers are forcing kids away from taking specific classes due to bias opinions, which is why for many schools in the United States language is not looked at as a priority. Picture growing up in a small town, in Maine, which in the data table from Shin and Kominski’s report showed to be a state with the least amount of citizens that spoke a language other than English as their primary language, shows that for some people language is hard to see has being important. In High School some have found a passion in language but don’t receive the proper curriculum that would allow them to succeed. Instead of introducing language in High School, our school systems should focus on adding it into the curriculum that is taught in elementary school and middle school. By starting when you are young, the time you are graduating high school you can speak at least one other language and classify yourself as bilingual. Dianne Steinbach explained it as, “Something that many of us took for granted when we were younger people is now disappearing” (First Speakers:Restoring). Since there is such a large increase in language diversity
This tactic is effective because not only are the students getting used to the language, but, they are not being forced to speak English regularly. They can speak whatever language they like around their friends or family, but when it comes down to business, they better know how to use the English language.
I’m interested in attending the conference because I believe it would be interesting and very valuable to be around other people of other ethnicities interact and learn about what it’s like to be them. Since I’ve been going to Bellevue I’ve personally haven’t taken the opportunity to branch out as much and go to other clubs besides the BSU and Rotary to get to know others from other ethnicities and countries, and from my knowledge about the conference there is a good reputation of other ethnicities so I will be able to take advantage of the opportunity and socialize. I also have two young sisters who are in High School, look up to me and I try to be the best role model that I can be knowing I am a first generation student.
General Prologue: Chaucer begins the prologue with describing the Spring weather. He then goes on to talk about how many wish to go on pilgrimages this time of year, and also how many are traveling to go see Saint Thomas Becket in Canterbury. He also tells of twenty nine pilgrims, and hints how he will soon describe each in further detail. Sure enough, he goes on to describe most of the pilgrims. There is a clear contrast between his descriptions of different characters, it is obvious that he favors some more than others. The characters he honors or doesn’t mind are The Knight, The Squire, The Yeoman, The Merchant, The Oxford Cleric, The Man of Law, The Franklin, The Cook, The Doctor, The Plowman, The Manciple, and The Host. The characters
Students: including those studying from full-time to part-time, locally or by distance, from high to low socio-economic backgrounds and of varying ages