preview

Analyzing An Annotating In Shakespeare's 'King Lear'

Decent Essays

Analyzing an Annotating In analyses, I usually look mainly at theme and characters because these lenses help allow me to engage with the entire work. This time, though, I tried to look a little more at elements of meter and use of language and tried to make annotation of this in my e-book that were focused and organized. I also tried to keep a narrower view as I searched for ideas to write about because my split thesis was the main issue of my last analysis. Influences Seeing other's thoughts as they read through the play really helped me in my character analysis to see how others interpreted the characters and the connections that they drew between them. The different sources opened me up to a wide variety of experiences that gave fresh insight into the …show more content…

[comparison claim] Although the fool is often compared to Cordelia, his role is more like that Edgar’s in the way each, under a guise of foolishness, serves as a sort of guide to a disabled and troubled master. [policy claim] Despite Lear’s speech disregarding fidelity, the reader should determine that lust is actually condemned in the play as a folly since it causes the downfall of many characters. [definition claim] Although age is often cited as a primary factor of the way Lear and Gloucester misunderstand the world, wealth in the play is also an element associated with their detachment and blindness, as it keeps them from having to experience the hardness of reality. [evaluation claim] Despite the vagueness of the connection, it is better to read King Leer knowing that Cordelia and the fool were often the same actor in order to fully understand the role that each plays in the king's fall and

Get Access