Justified Hell In such inhumane conditions, a nation managed to justify the hell that it put Blacks through. How is it humane to enslave a person yet inhumane for the death penalty to be practiced? Living on a double standard, a nation built on civil rights has managed to justify this hell. In such harsh times, the South was frowned upon for slavery. The North was hypocrites for this accusation. Slavery was justified in the South. Throughout the world, one group subjugated another. With these reasons and lies from the opinion that wants to be heard; a nation is able to justify slavery. The grass is always greener on the other side. While the non-slave owners are pointing their fingers at the people who own them; the non-slave owners are hypocrites. Conditions in factory systems were argued to be …show more content…
Factory conditions were harsh. Workers in the Lowell Factory were under such harsh conditions that the women were not sure they could endure it. (Document A) They took women from their homes and relocated them closer to the factories. The women received almost no pay, the air was bad, and the factories were deafening loud. It was said that freedom for women was the most beneficial thing about working in these factories. In fact, Mary S Paul mentions that she has not been able to find enough time to even write a letter for about a week. If a whole week goes by, is there really freedom at all. (Document A) Catharine Beecher talks about how there was only half an hour allowed to eat before bed and right back to the mill in the morning. (Document J) Is it worse to be on a strict schedule with the lie of freedom, or is it worse to know the truth of slavery? On the greener side, slave owners could maximize cotton production and a cost-benefit
Document B is a journal entry from a man named Charles Mackay on his experience in the North. It gives us what blacks should be able to do and what restriction the had. According to Doc B, “We shall not make a black man a slave; we shall not buy or sell him; but we shall not associate with him”. This document tells us what rights black’s should have and what restrictions they could have.
In the American South, slaves were humiliated and considered as vulgar workers by being owned and treated without humanity by the employer showed in their living conditions, different treatment based on gender and age and the forced breakup of families.
DIRECTIONS: Compose a thesis controlled essay answering the following question based on YOUR analysis of the documents provided below. Take into account both the sources of the documents and the point of view of the authors. DO NOT SIMPLY WRITE A SUMMARY OF EACH INDIVIDUAL DOCUMENT.
There were several arguments that took place over whether or not slavery should be allowed to expand into the new territories. “During and after the war, American politicians became consumed with the issue of whether extensive territories won from Mexico should permit or prohibit slavery.” (Schultz, n.d.). The Democratic Party of Andrews Jackson believed to do what they can that was best for the “common man” but they demanded that the new territories allow slavery upon them which was not exactly the best for all “common men”. This was an argument between the Northerners and the Southerners, as one believed that the wealthy would come in and buy up all the land and leave no land available for the lower class men.
One social factor that led the African Americans to transition out of slavery in the late 19th century was the idea of marriage. The marriage of slaves wasn’t officially legal while most were still enslaved, but when they were freed they began to legalize their marriages. Mass wedding ceremonies after emancipation, was not an uncommon thing to see. Many African Americans in the South saw marriage as an important factor because it legitimized any children they had and they could choose a new last name that signified how they felt about their new found freedom.
I hope all is well with your daughter and granddaughters in Japan. I just wanted to add one more thing to this part of the discussion as I realized something after responding to Professor Jordan’s questions. For starters I want to add that keeping your workers in those conditions would produce horrible results. For one, they may not survive under these conditions, which means the “master” no longer has help on his plantation. On another note, how could one expect high results from these servants if they were not fed properly?
The Civil War was a four year long war that was unavoidable. The cause of the Civil War was slavery. Even though slavery was an atrocious idea, the South had slaves anyway. The Fugitive Slave Act made the Northerners worried and frightened because they didn’t want to help the slaves because they would get fined if caught doing so. The Missouri Compromise did not work out for the South, giving the North more power in the Senate. The South states thought they did not get a fair and equal say because there were more free states than slave states. The South got so angry and upset they decided to secede, or separate, from the United States of America. Since the Union got angry, they decided to attack. Some people may think a better way to settle
Slavery ended up coming to the colonies for different reasons such as; they needed to expand land for the need for labor. If they didn’t have enough land they couldn’t bring the slaves over to work for them. They had more than enough slaves with no land for them to do anything.
The Civil War was started by many events that proved to served sectional tensions, where the Kansas-Nebraska Act proved the tensions that had failed to be resolved. Northerners became more opposed to slavery, whether for moral or economic reasons, while Southerners became more united in their defense of slavery as an institution. Different ideas over slavery were shared. This caused sectional tensions and as the North and the South were trying to come with a consensus of what to do, things became more intense. Political sectionalism occurred because of certain events happening throughout the government. The repeal of the Missouri Compromise, which was followed by the Kansas Nebraska Act was a main cause in the lead of Civil War. Since the Kansas-Nebraska Act effectively repealed the Missouri Compromise, tensions regarding the issue and stance of slavery became more debated throughout the country. As the North and the South became increasingly different, their goals and desires separated as well. Arguments over national policy became more aggressive. Between the 1840s and 1850s, both the North and South evolved extreme positions that had as much to do with serving their own political interests as with the morality of slavery. As long as there were an equal number of slave-holding states in the South as non slaveholding states in the North, the two regions had even representation in the Senate and neither would dictate to the other. However, each new territory that applied for statehood threatened to upset this balance of power. Southerners consistently argued for states rights and a weak federal government, but it was not until the 1850s that the issue of secession was raised. Southerners argued that having the Constitution ratified and having agreed to join the new nation in the late 1780s, that they would retain the power to cancel the agreement. There were controversial attempts at a solution that included legal compromises and debates such as the Compromise of 1850, the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, and the Lincoln-Douglas Debates in 1858. However, Southerners felt that the laws favored the Northern economy and were designed to impede the South. Although, the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 which was in favor of
The American Civil War occurred between April 12, 1861, and May 9, 1865, and began due to the long-standing controversy of slavery in the country. Shortly after Abraham Lincoln took office, Confederates attacked Fort Sumter in South Carolina, and among the 34 U.S. states seven Southern slave states succeeded from the United States. More states seceded and the Confederacy grew up to eleven slave states. This split the country between the Union in the Northern states, and the Confederate States of America in the Southern states. One big disagreement many Americans have today is whether slaves rights was the cause of the Civil War or not. Charles B. Dew believes the Civil War was fought over slavery, using speeches and public letters of 41 white southerners who were commissioners and appealed to their audience the ideas of the preservation of slavery and white supremacy as his evidence. Gary W. Gallagher believes that the Civil War was not fought over slavery, and the main goal for Northerners was to preserve the Union, using letters of white Northern soldiers that do not show much concern for black people as his evidence. Frederick Douglass’s statement, “The cry of Free Men was raised, not for the extension of liberty to the black man, but for the protection of the liberty of the white” is valid because the Civil War was not fought for the equality of black people, African Americans were treated very poorly after the Civil War and the emancipation proclamation was passed for
Otherwise, what could justify this condition of slaves? Once more, in order to justify their ownership of other human beings, slave owners must constantly deny the humanity of their slaves. To convince themselves that their slaves are not quite human, slave owners treat them inhumanely. Even if some slaveholders were deeply convinced that black people were white men’s equal, they had to deny it or else slavery would stop. This is what Frederick Douglas called “the evil of slavery” in his narrative when good-natured slave owners had to forget their own feelings and to behave very severely toward them for the continuation of slavery. In treating their slaves like beasts, the masters became one themselves.
Many people dream of being able to live the American Dream and sadly, many people fall in the wrong hands and get cheated on a fake American dream. Although, America is always advertised as “The Land of the Free” slavery is still going on and no one seems to be aware of it or concerned about it. Kevin Bales and Ron Soodalter talk about slavery in The United States, in their article, Slavery In The Land of the Free. In this article, Bales and Soodalter talk about how slavery is still happening in the country, but in many different ways. Bales and Soodalter use stories, statics, and comparisons of every slavery case there is in America. However, most of the stories they told were about Hispanics being in slaved, and did not really include stories of other races
The causes and effects of slavery in the 16-19th century were good for Europeans and terrible for Native Americans and Africans. To start it all of the slave trade was started for, so that the europeans didn’t have to do much of the work. Europeans got sick so easily that they couldn't work in the hot temperatures for too long because their bodies would give out from heat exhaustion, also they would end up dying from common diseases. So they thought why not use someone else to do our work for us and someone that already knows what they are doing so that we do not have to spend our time training them in the field. They so discovered the African culture which they were used to the heat, immune to most diseases and they already knew how to farm from their own land. This made it really easy for the Europeans to get their crops and other goods farmed because they didn't have to do any of the planting,growing or picking of the crops they just had to go to the ports to get the slaves to do their work. Also the slaves help keep their livestock alive and well enough to eat.
Slavery is an extremely cruel tragedy in human history. Abraham Lincoln once said, “Whenever I hear anyone arguing for slavery, I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally.” Recently I just read two articles about this topic which introduce slaveries in both America and Britain. The authors concentrate on different perspectives on slavery in different region. Derek H. Alderman focuses on some heart factors of the struggle to remember the hurt of slavery, especially in America, while David Lambert examines the case of James MacQueen to analyze the relationships between slavery, exploration and the development of geography in Britain.
With no doubt slavery is a horrible and ugly part from the past, where African Americans were involuntary forced into slavery and treated worse than an animal and more like property. We have a few founders like Jefferson who were known as slaveholders, and unfortunately those slaveholders believed they treated the slaves with great care and justified their actions. Nevertheless black, escaped slaves like Harriet Tubman or Frederick Douglass prove truthfully that slaves were treated inhumane and poorly. As time went by a lot of people realized how crucial slavery is, so selected people worked towards the abolishment of slavery. If people did not try to control others, but help live together on this planet resources and things like race inequality