The Age Of Reason Thomas Paine Summary

Religion played a crucial role in Paine's argument. He knew that the most of colonists had some sort of religion that he can use as a basis for his argument. One of the points that he made was that a “distinction … of men into Kings and Subjects,” is not from god, it is from the “heathens,” (Paine, 72). Paine made sure to tell the readers that this interpretation is directly from the Bible so if anyone wanted to check for themselves they can. He supported many of the things he said from the Bible so that people would not question it. He used stories of how Israel wanted a king even though god himself did not want one to voice his opposition of the leadership of monarchy. The Bible was a major source that Paine used in order to unify the people under one cause. Before this essay people did not know who to side with, the new colonies or the monarchy, who they have who they have been loyal to until this point. Now Common Sense gives them a reason to support the

Typology has been used for many centuries and has gone through numerous changes. These changes range from legendary, Puritan storyteller Mary Rowlandson, onto the nature-loving, pastor Johnathan Edwards, as well as the historic Enlightenment, political thinker Thomas Paine. It is important to have an understanding of typology and its definition in order to be able to read and understand the profound concept that it is. It is basically looking at the stamp of life and interpreting it for what it is, rather than what it is like or what it could be. In typology there is an antitype and type. The antitype is unique, original that is difficult to mimic and understand; therefore, as an example, the antitype is a rubber stamp. The type is essentially the printed image or the imprint of the antitype. Typology has multiple definitions and there are various forms of typology, but we’ll focus on the one defined beforehand and look at three of its varying forms— the biblical typology of Mary Rowlandson, the natural typology of Johnathan Edwards, and the political typology of Thomas Paine. Typology’s many forms allow it to be incredibly diverse and the cause for the shift in its types will be discussed as well.

Thomas Paine made no secret for his hatred of the British monarchy. This was partially due to their absolutism beliefs, the oppression of his countrymen, and the system of government where the rich got richer and the poor get poorer. He believed that Britain would never have a balanced government so long as monarchy and hereditary succession stayed in place. When Thomas Paine immigrated to Philadelphia, several things had strong influences on his writing of Common Sense. The Intolerable acts as well as the Enlightenment Challenge influenced his writing concerning the view of parliament and British monarchy (maybe switch this sentence for the next one).After Parliament had passed The Intolerable Acts, Paine watched the continuation and control the British Monarchy and Parliament had in America, along with their unnatural behaviors and influence over government issues, the ideological changes that came from ‘The Enlightenment Challenge’. Paine believed change could and should happen; that America could find economic independence and not carry any burden of debt if they separated from Britain since their debt was actually Britain’s in the first place. Paine said that there could be no reconciliation; he understood that to become free and have liberties with an independent government there was no going back, only forward. Paine had a strong desire to see religious freedom become possible, and for people to have the right to choose and

Paine's essay presents that the government was always in God's hands. In paragraph 3 he says, 'my secret opinion has ever been, and still is, that God Almighty will not give up a people to military destruction,' which means he believes that God was in charge of the govt. In paragraph 3 it also says, 'Neither have I so much of the infidel in me, as to suppose that He has relinquished the govt, of the world,' what that means is he believes in no religion but believes that god has relinquished the government. Also, in paragraph 1 there is some talk about how the government is unfair, which is another thing Paine presents in his essay. Citizenship is presented as being very hard to show loyalty to Britain.

In Section II, Of Monarchy and Hereditary Succession, he incites the spirit of Americans that lives on today by talking of mankind’s “equality in the order of creation” (Paine, n.pag.). He uses biblical foundation to discredit the fallible distinction of king and subjects. He also discredits a government of mixed state and warns of the concentration of power. Paine’s building on biblical reference in relation to equality and natural rights is clearly written in the value held by the majority, and expresses his commitment to the people.

#1 He was saying that the revolution would be hard, but it will be worth it in the end. The British don’t have the power to tax and “enslave” them. Only God has the power to take away freedom. The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. Paine is making an emotional, ethical, and logical appeal. The counter argument could be that the Americans owe the English because they were granted everything from England. It’s going to be bad if you lose. The logical fallacies are Sentimental Appeal and Faulty Analogy.

Paine ends his piece by applying the use of biblical allusions, thereby allowing him to effectively appeal to the soldiers’ sense of spirituality, as this pamphlet was written at a time in which faith and the belief in God was common place. Discouraged by their recent setbacks, Paine provides a boost in the soldiers’ morale by presenting his personal opinion that, “God Almighty will not give up a people to military destruction, or leave them unsupportedly to perish…” These uplifting words provide the opportunity for the troops to renew their faith in God and further inspire them to pursue their cause. Paine strengthens his claim by going on to say that, “I cannot see on what grounds the king of Britain can look up to heaven for help against

The first point Paine makes in his pamphlet is an argument against the concept of monarchy, in his opinion a corrupt and worthless institution. Paine supported the values of equality among all human beings and for this reason he was against the Britain hereditary succession, which did not evaluate the skills and knowledge of the people who were ruling the country. Even if Paine criticized the British monarchial government, he also brought to light the form of government that he believed would have suited America: a democracy. Pain

The first rationalist tenet that Thomas Paine demonstrates is that liberty and freedom are God-given inalienable rights. In The Crisis,

taxed without representation? Whats the worth in fighting?’ His dramatic thoughts turned into a straightforward style. This style could be agreed upon by all tired civilians—and it was. When you analyze Paine’s writings, nothing is sugar coated. He blatantly states the truth, and the reason loyalists argue with Paine is because they don't live in corrupt lifestyles, they don't see the hardships faced, such as problems with taxes, or enslavement. When you cant experience the ideal that one is preaching, how can you agree? How could you be on their side? Its simple—you cannot.

Paine then talks with the patriotic Americans about coming along with him and not messing with anyone that will disapprove the American War of Independence. With his strong will and power Paine tries to take on each argument to get his point across about trying to get freedom in America he tries to start an argument with a well-known group called the Quakers, and when taking on the Quakers, Paine expresses that they should not use their American politics views tangled with their religious views. In answering the Question “Did the author get their point across?” I can say Mr. Paine put effort into trying to base his thoughts off of freedom for Americans and making arguments with Quakers to get them to not mix their views up and see how he’s fighting for something for Americans to get them freedom and with his feelings getting involved Mr. Paine feels anyone who’s against him stands for the British which he feels Americans have fallen under the British rules. In which he believes the British are trying to protect themselves in meaning the colonies for a financial standpoint and being in that colony British talked about the need for protection and he felt as if that all should not take place in America ,and that there should be freedom without any unnecessary things going

Though, it does seem Paine saw America through rose-colored glasses, possibly due to smoking something heavy... He did amplify his view of America and spoke highly of it. However, he nonetheless, did make a very compelling and convincing argument to the Americans in a simplified easy understandable way through his pamphlets. Common Sense educated the people on the war, and contributed to spreading the concept of republicanism to them. He also gave them a clear understanding of how separation from Britain would hold on their future.

When Americans who once worshipped Paine started reading his thoughts on religion, they began to change how they felt about him. Upon his return to the United States in the 1800’s, he found that his writing “The Age of Reason” left him essentially

In Paine’s Common Sense, there is a central theme that shows up in multiple works he wrote, Independence. He was strongly against the government and supports this belief with a quote from his work Common Sense, “Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil” (http://www.earlyamerica.com). This quote supports his belief that people do not need the government and that they should be independent. Supporting this belief, Paine states that the natural state of man is to live without government (http://www.sparknotes.com)

6. What is the view of Gideon that Paine uses as an example? "As the exalting one man so greatly above the rest cannot be justified on the equal rights of nature, so neither can it be defended on the authority of scripture; for the will of the Almighty" (Gideon). From this quote of Gideon, we can assume Gideon's point of views. He thinks that all men are equal and no one man can be above the rest. He also thinks that only God can rule over people.