$12.11 million. Stephen Curry, a great NBA player, makes $12.11 million. He is a replica of one of the best basketball players. Sports is one of the most popular things to watch on television. Athletes do entertain us with their great skills, but they don’t save lives or cure diseases. There are many reasons why athletes should not be paid with a hefty salary. For instance, athletes and their colleagues tend to make $3.2 million to $5.15 million dollars a year range. During the regular season professional athletes often practice, to a great extent of 40 hours a week. Athletes don’t have to practice all year because their job concludes of just their game season. While athletes make so much, an average family makes roughly $32,000 a year. They
It is unbelievable how much sports players get payed to run around for about 3 hours throwing balls and exercising. To start the players that get paid the most are NBA (National Basketball Association) get $5.15 million per year. Next the players that get paid the most are in the MLB. Each year they get an average of $3.2 million. After MLB, NHL players get paid the third most. They average 2.4 million per year. Last but not least the NFL players get paid the 4th most in the whole world. The minimum salary
Professional athletes in the United States are given extremely substantial contracts and lucrative endorsement deals and it has been argued that their salaries should be reduced to smaller wages but others say they are paid accordingly. The argument that athletes are overpaid not only exists in the United States but also all over the world. Most countries however do not have the variety of major sports that the U.S. has. When athletes are being paid millions of dollars each year, it raises an important discussion. This discussion is about how we value and compensate athletes and whether or not their salary is too much. This also leads to an argument asking if American priorities are altered by the significant difference of athletes
Whether college athletes should or should not get paid has been a controversial topic throughout the Collegiate Athletic Association for many years now. According to the article “My Priceless Opportunity” by Bill Walton , he believes that NCAA student athletes should not get paid because “the players entering the game know the rules going in and that they have been given a chance to make something of their lives in exchange for the privilege of being a student athlete”. Others like Michael Wilbon, author of “As Colleges’ Greed Grows, So Does the Hypocrisy”, thinks student athletes should get paid due to their hard work and labor. While I respect and admire the diligent task of being both a student and an athlete, I strongly agree with Bill Walton and the many others who support college athletes not being paid.
around 6 million dollars a year. Most argue that the athletes are paid enough when it comes to
A lot of people to this day wonder if student athletes should be paid. This topic has created a lot of controversy among a ton of people. Yes, paying student athletes seems harmless, but if you look beyond the big picture, it could ultimately ruin the NCAA and all college sports for good. UWIRE Text stated, “Getting paid would suggest that college athletes are simply carrying out job responsibilities instead of a recreational activity on game day, which could take away the fun and sanctity of watching the NCAA” (UWIRE Text). Student athletes in college should not be paid to play their respected sports due to the fact that they are already getting paid and that it would make the NCAA organization uneven in the payment of players, the classroom,
In 2012, the NCAA earned $871.6 million in revenue (Dirlam), but it is never distributed to the workforce. As it stands, the NCAA forbids college athletes from earning any compensation from participation in college athletics. Scandals surrounding high-profile college football stars who accepted payment for providing autographs have brought to light what is wrong with NCAA policy. Athletes from college football and men’s basketball deserve a piece of the $871.6 million revenue pie. These sports athletes occupy a different role on campus, the role of an employee as well as a student that female and other male athletes do not. Paying athletes’ a full salary for their participation is an extreme solution. Instead, the NCAA can solve the
This scholarly article by Debra Blum attempts to legitimize the argument that athletes should be compensated for their hard work from the perspective of former Duke University player Dick DeVenzio. It describes his struggle in day to day life and shows that players need to receive compensation to survive. This source provides primary source evidence for my argument.
Imagine going to work at your job every single day but never getting a paycheck. That is the crisis that college athletes are currently going through. Division 1 athletes produce billions of dollars for everyone around them, but the athletes themselves do not get a dime. The idea of student athletes being paid by their college has been proposed numerous times, but has been denied by the NCAA every time. Colleges have plenty of money that is generated by the athletes that they can pay them. Having enough money is not the issue. There is enough money to do it, but the NCAA thinks athletes should not be paid. In order to solve the problem of NCAA Division 1 athletes not being paid, the NCAA must allow colleges to pay their athletes, to ensure that the hard working athletes are being paid.
Over the last few years college sports have gained immense popularity. Therefore college sports have generate millions of dollars for the NCAA and the university's. The players for the universities aren’t getting a cent of these profits. Hence why the NCAA should allow athletes to get a salary for their participation in sports. Others think that the athletes don’t deserve to be paid because of their scholarships.
In the United States, how athletes in college are compensated has been controversial topic. While certain people believe that college athletes should not be paid since they receive scholarships, it would eliminate the main purpose of colleges, being about education (Acquaviva, 2015). On the other hand, certain people believe that college athletes should be paid for risking their bodies, for spending most of their time practicing, and for bringing in money and good publicity to their school and National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). College Sports are about the athletes that push themselves to become one of the greatest that they can be, when others are in their bed sleeping or out partying, these individuals are pushing their bodies as well as their brains. Since these people dedicate their selves to these sports, should college athletes be financially compensated for their hard work? Those who take the position of supporting the notion of paying college athletes argue that the
The NCAA brings in 11 billion dollars a year in revenue just from their college athletes. That $11 billion dollars alone is more than the annual revenue of both the NBA and the NHL. For example, The University Of Alabama brought in 143.3 million dollars in athletic revenue alone. That annual figure is not only more than any team in the NHL, but it is also more than 25 of the 30 teams in the NBA. Somehow people still think that with that amount of money being brought in yearly that college athletes don’t have the right to be paid. However, college athletes should be paid for the revenue they generate for the universities.
There are many global issues that are a problem today, and college sports are involved in that category. College sports are popular around the world, but mainly in the United States. Every year the same question comes up about college athletes potentially being paid by their colleges. They should definitely not be paid. College athletes are spoiled while most are getting full scholarships full of benefits.
Some athletes dream of continuing their careers in college. The big controversial issue is should college athletes be paid? This quote from Elissa Cordrey is very meaningful to college athletics because it isn’t all about the money. “If the child is playing for the sake of a scholarship, and not for love of the game, be careful, she warned. "Keep your eyes wide open.
There are positive and negative sides to paying college athletes, but when it comes down to a solution. I think college athletes should not be paid. They do deserve some benefits but paying them is too much. Anyways it would be unfair to other student athletes and non- student athletes. If they do get paid it is going to have a cause and effect domino. It would cut other academic programs, it would cut other sports for some of the smaller colleges. It makes a really big impact on not paying athletes because they are still amateur athletes that are playing for an institution versus playing professional where there are playing for money and not there for education, which these athletes playing for their school they are there for an education
College athletes should get paid because it will help keep the college athletes to finish their education; their performance, efforts, and dedication deserve more compensation.