Analysis Of We Do Abortions Here : A Nurse's Tale

In the news article “Abortion: Every Woman’s Rights” Sharon Smith wrote an article about women’s rights to get abortions prior to the hearing of the Planned Parenthood v. Casey court case, “which threatened to severely restrict women access to abortion” (Smith). Women wanted reproductive control over their lives and felt that they were not equal to men no matter what advances they got at work and how high their level of education was. The women’s right movement wanted women to have the choice of abortion for all women, the rich and the poor. In the US, thirty- seven states did not provide

Sallie Tisdale’s “We do abortions here” is an informational narrative discussing the controversial topic of abortion coming from a primary source. Tisdale’s purpose is to bring a humanistic side to the issue of abortion, she attempts to lift the cruel and unjust stigma behind the procedure but ultimately lets her audience make their own decision on the matter, since she does not let her opinion on abortion be known but provides all the details regarding the procedure from a nurse’s perspective, including the good and bad experiences she sees on a day to day basis, from sharing “transient bonds” with her clients to handling “bloody remains” and the “numbing sameness” of her job. Tisdale’s story is an example of narration because she structures

Two feminist readings, “Abortion” by Jennifer Saul and “Racism, Birth Control, and Reproductive Rights” by Angela Davis, both cover the important feminist topics of abortion and reproductive rights, but in different ways. Though very alike, the pieces are different in important ways, as they both bring ideas to the table that work in tandem with each other, as I will discuss below. In this paper, I will cover the difference in how these authors approach the subject, how arguments from Saul’s writing strengthens those in Davis’, and how Davis’ essay highlights the importance of intersectionality in feminist discourse.

Writer met with Joselina to review her care plan and completed it with her signature. Joselina also signed her crisis plan that we completed on the phone. Joselina told care manager that she is now linked with a new counselor (Andrew Irish) at Lake Shore Behavior at Abbott Road. She said she likes her new counselor because she really listens to her and understands her as compared to her old counselor. Joselina said her next appointment with her counselor will be on the 6th of next this month. Joselina said she will discuss her social anxiety with her counselor and hopefully she can help her face it. Joselina also told care manager that she will be meeting her Mental Health doctor (Dr Napoli) on the 15th of this month for the first time. Care

Bertha, M. (2014). Pro-Life, Pro-Choice : Shared Values in the Abortion Debate. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press. https://fortlewis.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search- ebscohost-com.fortlewis.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edspmu&AN=edspmu.9780826519924&site=eds-live&scope=site Throughout this book, Bertha claims that she is for pro choice, but at the end of the reading, she states that she has changed her beliefs to pro life. This specific author performed studies, exams, courses, and clinicals and discovered the facts about the harm that takes place to your body after having an abortion. Bertha discusses the hard, mental griefs and traumas that follow the procedure, as well as the uneasy argument about the virtuous worth of the human fetus. The author brings experience to the discussion through the psychological department, being an Associate Professor of Philosophy in the School of Humanities, Arts and Cultural Studies at Arizona State University, as well as having written many informative and knowledgeable articles.

Annotated Bibliography Ahmed, Aziza. “Informed Decision Making and Abortion: Crisis Pregnancy Centers, Informed Consent, and the First Amendment.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, March 2015. Web.

My patient is a 38-year-old woman of Asian descent. She was admitted for an elective cesarean on September 11, 2017. She gave birth to a baby girl at 0911 hr that day. Her past obstetrical history includes three therapeutic abortions and a previous term birth (G5T1P0A3L1). The previous term birth was also a female delivered via cesarean. This child is now 6 years old. The patient contracted HIV in South Korea around 2000 or 2001. As a result, the female infant is being given Zidouvudine, to prevent the transmission of HI. Furthermore, the mother was advised not to breastfeed, as HIV can be transmitted through breastmilk. The patient also has a history of recreational drug abuse, specifically crystal meth and cocaine, as well as alcohol abuse.

Abortion has been progressively restricted in many states across America, and this strong push is coming from believers. This act affects The United States in many ways; Amanda Marcotte from Alternet writes, “thanks to increasingly restrictive state and local laws and overzealous law enforcement, we are seeing a return to pre-Roe back-alley abortions and increasingly criminal treatment of women.” These restrictions, promoted by believers, infringe on women’s rights and contribute to danger of female health.

As a surgery performed so commonly that three out of ten women will go through this procedure in their life, abortion remains a controversial topic. Ranging from establishing when the human life begins, the safety of the surgery, to social and welfare status of the mother, it has become an unending battle between the two stand. However, as a landmark decision made by the United States Supreme Court in the Roe v. Wade case, abortion is ruled legal in the United States while adhering to each state’s regulations. We Do Abortions Here: A Nurse’s Story by Sallie Tisdale described personal experiences of a nurse at an abortion clinic. Sallie Tisdale has earned many awards for her work, including the Regional Arts and Culture Council Literary Fellowship, Pushcart Prize, and James Phelan Literary Award.

Abortion has been a controversial topic since being declared a “fundamental right” following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on Roe v. Wade in 1973. There are two different areas of advocacy: those who identify themselves as pro-life, and those who identify by pro-choice. Pro-life activists view abortion as an immoral killing of a human being, and do not condone it under any circumstance. Pro-choice activists believe abortion is a civil right, and women should be in control of any decision regarding their bodies.

“The Mother” by Gwendolyn brooks is a poem that’s told from the perspective of an anonymous speaker- mother who has had numerous abortions. Through the course of the poem we find that the mother is struggling to cope with her feelings towards the actions she had taken to terminate her children. Upon reading the poem one may just zero in on the theme of abortion plays. However, “the mother” shows that motherhood and abortion are both complicated choices- not the simple situation we consider them to be. The poem is meant to be a first-person reflection on something personal that women face on a daily basis, what the aftermath of having an abortion is really like, and the struggle of being able to cope with the excruciating experience that.

Abortion has always been a controversial topic in the United States for decades. Abortion is like taking the life of someone without their permission so it is technically “murder”. There is no such thing as an unwanted child, millions of families in the United States are always willing to adopt. On the other hand, there are circumstances where a woman can barely care and sustain herself so chances are that she will not be able to take care of her child. Or when a rape occurs, having an abortion is not as bad as when a woman has sex without protection and knows she has the chance to get pregnant.

Howleen buried her face in her hands, just shaking her head and whimpering. The others just stared at Howleen in pure confusion and shock.

Before researching on abortion issues, I never imagined it to be such controversial and debatable case because the problem arises from the very early stages of analyzing what administrative ethics would answer. I became overwhelmed to start because my mind became blurred on legality and ethics of abortion as early as defining administrative ethics: “well-based standards of right and wrong prescribing what public administrators ought to do in terms of duty to public service, principles, virtues, and benefits to society”. Ethics triangle is grounded on duties in the center with principles, virtues, and benefits to society augmenting it. Duties of public administrator involves those ‘obligations taken on while assuming a position’. They might

“You don’t have the mental capacity to take care of yourself, let alone a baby!” Larry said. Tomorrow, you tell Shelly to get an abortion,” Larry said.