preview

The Rescuer From Error And City Of God

Good Essays

Despite the fact that Ghazali in “The Rescuer from Error” is searching for certain knowledge but states in a paradoxical manner that this may actually not be possible, he is the most persuasive author when considering the knowledge of the divine alongside Plato in “The Republic” and Augustine in “City of God”. Ghazali considers both belief and knowledge as necessary for knowledge of the divine while Plato focuses solely on knowledge. On the other side, while Augustine does support the idea of a rational soul, he refutes his own claim when considering the miracles of God. In this essay I will argue that incorporating both knowledge and belief, Ghazali provides an approach in which humans gain the most knowledge of the divine because knowledge-based belief combines a necessary personal journey and faith in the divine when human intellect can only go so far. I will outline this argument by looking at what each author defines as knowledge of the divine, how he sees this divine affecting human life, and why this argument is either persuasive or non-persuasive using Ghazali as a base to refute and/or support their claims. Ghazali establishes the divine as God Almighty who guides and allows truth to lead (Ghazali 78). God does this through the prophet Muhammad who, among many things, is a messenger (Ghazali 77). The message he is delivering is one from God to humankind; as an intermediary, the prophet himself acts as the source of knowledge of the divine. Ghazali explores how

Get Access