The Devil Take Tomorrow by Gretchen Jeannette, is historical fiction set in Philadelphia during the American Revolutionary War. Gretchen Jeannette did an exceptional job creating dynamic engaging characters that brought the uncertainty and intensity of the time period to life. I must admit that I am not an expert in the time period, but the detail given about the war, lifestyles, clothing, and culture seemed well researched to me. Most of the time, the historical elements were woven into the story, but there were moments where the reader would be temporarily transported outside of the story to be given historical context. This typically happened when background about a place or event that had been important earlier in the war was necessary for context for the reader who is not especially well versed in their knowledge of the Revolutionary War. I personally found this insertion of information helpful, but I could see it being off putting as well. …show more content…
While Gretchen jumped right into the action, wasting no time in absorbing the reader into the chaos of the time, the first chapter felt reminiscent of a cliche romance novel to me; It began with the brave and independent female lead being rescued by the handsome mysterious stranger who finds himself entranced by her beauty and spirit. That being said, the novel quickly redeemed itself in the following chapters. While Ethan Matlock, a spy surrounded by enemies, was the focus of the novel, the story was told from multiple perspectives. Gretchen succeeded in bringing each character’s distinct voice to life. Each character felt believable and well developed. Their combined perspectives added depth to the story and created a gratifying balance between romance, intrigue, and action keeping the reader enthralled throughout the
This book was very interesting. The book had a lot of drama and I really enjoyed it. Although, the book ended on a cliffhanger, I still really liked it. There was conflict throughout the book with Ethan and his family. His family thought that things would go back
The main focal point of Erik Larson’s Devil in the White City is centered around the excitement, murders, and magic of the Chicago World’s Fair of 1893. In 1890, Chicago was becoming a very populated and anxious city of America. The city itself wanted something to prove to the more traditional eastern cities of the United States. Driven by its massive civic pride, Chicago joined in the election against New York, St. Louis, and Washington, D.C. to be considered where the placement of the next World’s Fair would be located. Paris, France hosted the previous World’s Fair and left the world astonished with its architectural achievements with the Eiffel tower. Civic leaders in the opposing cities ultimately agreed to place the Fair in Chicago.
By writing The Devil in the White City in the form of a dual-narrative, Larson brings both stories to a level of excellence that neither could reach on its own. The interesting and informative chapters detailing the fair are complemented nicely by the suspenseful and thrilling installments of America’s first serial killer.
The friendships and relationships formed and broken by characters and how they impacted on others at the time was a big part of the read. More
Overall, his perspective helped to make the book a little more interesting in that he was not all the time there.
Nathaniel Hawthorne and Washington Irving are two of the most prolific and successful writers of their era. Hawthorne’s, “Young Goodman Brown” is a story about a man, Goodman Brown who happens to set out on a trip for an evil purpose. On the way he meets a man who offers him his staff, saying that it might help him walk faster, but Goodman Brown refuses and wishes to return back to his village for the sake of his wife, Faith. On the other hand, Irving’s, “The Devil and Tom Walker” is about an individual who lets his greed and selfishness take charge of him. Tom Walker, a greedy man, attempts to make a deal with a devil. Tom seeks wealth and in return the devil asks for his soul. In both stories, the authors express their feelings and views about staying away from indulgence and sin. In spite of all the difference among Hawthorne’s, “Young Goodman Brown” and Irving’s, “The Devil and Tom Walker,” they share salient similarities such as setting, symbolism, and author’s purpose.
Our eyes unconsciously record thousands upon thousands of bits of information every second. Our brain then acts as a filter to sort out what it thinks is useful and what is not. By doing this, the brain guides us into seeing only what is important. We never see the full picture; just what our brain guides us to see. Metaphors act in the same way in that they guide how people view certain topics and issues. A specific metaphor that becomes accepted by a large enough population of community will determine how most people in the community view that issue. In a way the metaphor skews the perception of those who hear it. This was the case for the metaphors of cancer in the late 20th century which we can see through Susan Sontag’s piece, “Illness as Metaphor”. We can also see this manifested in metaphors associated with people diagnosed with Morgellons’ disease in Leslie Johnson’s narrative, “The Devil’s Bait”. Both pieces deal with how metaphors have shaped the outlook of patients of their respective diseases. Metaphors obscure and shift our understanding of disease and pain away from the full truth into a smaller and less understanding perspective. The similarities between the metaphor of cancer as death and Morgellons as a farce prove that metaphors of disease isolate patients diagnosed with those diseases.
Washington Irving’s “The Devil and Tom Walker” illustrates how an individual’s corruption results from their ability to resist temptation, the virtue to act generously, and the self-discipline to perform genuinely. Temptation, symbolized by the Devil and characterized by desperation in this prose, is that catalyst that forces Tom’s proverbial ball to roll. First and foremost, Tom chooses a shortcut home out of ease and lack of time that “like most shortcuts... was an ill-chosen route (280);” along his path of “smothering mud (280)” and “half-drowned, half-rotting [hemlocks and pines] (280)” –likely representative of the comeuppances of giving into temptations–Tom confronts the Devil for the first time and eventually ends up selling his soul
In my opinion, the author, Ruta Sepetys, moves the novel in an interesting fashion. I liked how there are many characters and how there is a lot of things happening. The author kept the reader interested at all times throughout the novel. The author, Ruta Sepetys, who writes historical non fiction books just as this novel, was born the daughter of a Lithuanian Refugee which may have influenced her to write this very novel. It is geared in a positive way due to Joana, a main character in the novel, helping to portray this with her nursing skills. Seeing the book in the Character of Joana’s eyes affects the overall novel in many different ways. Some may be on Joana’s good side and others may be on her bad side.
One of the things about the book that I personally liked was the characters, some of them were easy to relate to, even if you couldn't you could relate someone you knew with them. For example, David is not one of the main characters from the story but the more you learn about him, the more you realize how ambitious he is, wanted to change his career path almost every week, standing up to Mr. Neck. I think he's one of the things that helped Melinda find her voice.
In the play The Crucible there was a lot of round characters. A round character is a major character in a work of fiction that encounters conflict and is transformed by it. A round character that stuck out to me was Reverend Hale. Reverend Hale had obvious changes towards the court system as the play progressed.
On the whole, the writer creates an immense contrast between both of these characters. The use of immaculate description, as well as short, sharp phrases assists the reader in gaining a vivid image of how these
Not only do the roles of the characters compel a reader, they also illustrate the
In the novel Devil in a Blue Dress, the reader is introduced to the character of Ezekiel "Easy" Rawlins who is an African American man in the late 1940’s. The novel, which was published 1990, was made into a film adaptation in 1995. The scene that made the difference between the novel and the film would be the scene of Easy’s house and how the neighborhood is portrayed. In terms of the historical aspect in both the novel and the film the historical interpretation could be questioned, but when put together it should be questioned.
Hi Gabriel, I'm Mizzy. Thank you for sharing that episode of "Futurama", I have heard of this show and seen a few episodes, but like you've explained some of the episodes are a bit much with all the vulgar language inappropriate actions and subject and the manner they present it. I myself is not a fan, as sometimes I find it to be just not funny, cruel and to be frank in some cases just plain stupid. I did not see this episode, but having read your breakdown of the episode I have to say it was a bit surprised that they did not give Leela a harder time about lying and stealing someone else work, just because of what I know about the show they tend to feed off each other's shortcomings. I guess in some part this episode has a moral when Leela