preview

Analysis Of Richard Wright's The Man Who Was Almost A Man

Decent Essays

Richard Wright’s “The Man Who Was Almost a Man” centers Dave Saunders, a seventeen-year-old plantation worker, who wants respect from his peers. On his way home, Dave fantasizes about having a gun. It’s the only way to validate his manhood and get the respect he deserves. He walks to Joe’s shop to borrow a catalog. Joe couldn’t fathom what a boy would want with a gun, yet nonetheless, he offers him a left-hand Wheeler for just two dollars. Dave races home hoping that his mother will give him the means from his pay. He holds off asking until his dad has left the room. When the coast is clear, he begins pleading his case. Immediately, his mother is furious, but eventually folds. She allows him to buy a gun on one condition: he must bring her the gun straightaway. However, he hides it and leaves early for work the next morning. Dave had never shot a gun before, so he held it loosely and shut his eyes. He ends up shooting Mr. Hawkins’ mule Jenny. At first, he lies but quickly confesses. His father tells him to return the gun and give Hawkins the money as …show more content…

It is written in third person limited omniscient, which basically has two points of view. Even more perplexing, the views are intertwined together, but blended beautifully in this case. The only thing saving mass confusion is the difference in both diction and, of course, perspective. Readers are able to experience Dave’s thoughts and emotions—which is awfully a lot like first person—throughout this entire fiasco. However, the narrator speaking in third person permits readers to have an objective approach to the story. This way allows people to understand the actions of other characters as well. Having both subjective and objective gives insight on what is actually happening in the story. Is the narrator naïve because of age, inexperience, or cultural difference? Are they unreliable because of bias, character, or mental

Get Access