preview

Analysis Of Man At The Crossroads By Diego Rivera

Decent Essays

Man at the Crossroads was originally commissioned by the Rockefellers in 1932, the mural was meant to be put on the ground-floor wall of Rockefeller center. The mural was supposed to be a thought-provoking piece on the development of the world and art itself. When Diego Rivera started on the piece he had an original sketch of three men holding hands, one a soldier, another a peasant, and the final a worker. From this original concept sketch blossomed what became Man at the Crossroads, the worker remained in the middle of the Rockefeller piece controlling a machine surrounded by the very things that make up our universe, but the peasant and soldiers were cast off to the sides of the mural. This mural was a beautiful concept piece that would have been the pride of Rockefeller center had Rivera not decided to make a risky move. …show more content…

His preference for free accessibility to his art was always important in his choosing of projects. He preferred to paint murals at universities or on sides of building so his art could be free for the rich and poor and not stuck in some gallery for only the most elite capitalists to see. This shined through in his painting of Man at the crossroads when decided to add Vladimir Lenin, a renowned Russian community to his art piece after news outlets had called the mural “ anti-capitalist propaganda.” Rivera was also already in trouble with the Rockefellers because of the addition of John D Rockefeller Jr. drinking in a club with a bunch of loose women. But, Rivera's addition of Lenin was the breaking point for his work on the mural, he was told to halt work and the mural was covered up until it was ultimately destroyed by workers in

Get Access