preview

Analysis Of Kenneth Branagh's Much Ado About Nothing

Good Essays

Kenneth Branagh’s Much Ado About Nothing is remarkably different in tone from the other plays discussed. Unlike the other two comedies, Taming of the Shrew and Merchant of Venice, there are far fewer comedic aspects that do not translate well to modern audiences. The film has much less violence in it than the others and even its chief villain is more like a cartoon villain than an outright evil manipulator.

The tragedies are known for their fascinatingly complex villains such as Richard III or Iago, but Keanu Reeves’ Don John comes across as a character lost in the wrong movie. He lurks in the shadows and is not really given a compelling motive for his cruel actions. He does not even enact the rare few scenes of violence in the film. In a different play, the ineffectual portrayal of the villain could ruin the whole production, but Branagh understands that Much Ado About Nothing’s most important parts are the dynamics between the two sets of couples, something this film does quite well.

It is this toning down of violence and dark undertones that allows the film to be so successful. Claudio’s striking of Hero is the most noticeable physical violence and it is quickly followed by a romantic scene between Beatrice and Benedick to restore the tone. It comes across well as a modern romantic comedy, with just enough darkness to drive the plot forward. To make the film darker than it has to be would diminish how enjoyable and fun to watch it is.

Henry V is similar in some ways

Get Access