preview

Analysis Of Dead Wake: The Last Crossing Of The Lusitania By Erik Larson

Decent Essays

In Dead Wake: The Last Crossing of the Lusitania, Erik Larson tells a story of events surrounding the sinking of Lusitania. He argues that the ship would not have sunken if time management was different and Room 40 gave detailed directions and warnings to the ship. He claims that the ship sank for many reasons which led to significant consequences such as United States joining Britain for World War I. Erik Larson’s argument is correct since he has so much evidence in the novel that explains the forces and reasons of the ship’s sinking and strongly analyzes his claims and directs quotes to support them. For example, “Perfectly safe; safer than the trolley cars in New York City..” “We just laughed it off, and said they would never get us, we were too quick, too speedy.” …show more content…

In addition, timing is an important factor that led to the sinking. “By the time Bernard made this charge, he had come to understand what few others seemed to grasp, which was that on this particular voyage, given the convergence of disparate forces, timing was everything. Even the briefest delay could shape history.” (117) The reasons why the ship was so late to start its destination were because of the transferring of the passengers from Cameronia to the Lusitania and Captain Turner’s niece visiting the ship. If this had not happened, the Lusitania would have been closer to its destination and would never have encountered the U-20 submarine. Room 40 also played a huge part of the ship’s sinking. “The Admiralty’s telegraphic records show no reference made at all to the Lusitania, by now four days into its voyage and halfway across the Atlantic,” (168) “The Admiralty was well aware the Lusitania would soon transverse these same waters but made no effort to provide specifics of the night’s events directly to Captain Turner,” and “No attempt was made to divert the

Get Access