In his essay "The Inevitable Lightening of Citizenship," Christian Joppke discusses the phenomenon whereby the subjective value of citizenship is decreasing in the face of globalization, because allegiance to a particular nation-state is far less important than the transnational transfer of wealth and ideology. At the same time, the objective value of citizenship in the "right" (meaning wealthy and relatively free) countries is increasing, because being born in one of these countries means that an individual will essentially inherit much greater choices and opportunities than someone born in the "wrong" (meaning poor or politically restrictive) country. While Joppke does not necessarily claim that the lightening of citizenship is good or bad, because he is more concerned with demonstrating how it is happening rather than discussing what should be done about it, considering the lightening of citizenship in the context of nationalism and its detrimental effects suggests that this lightening is actually a good thing, so long as it is coupled with a concerted effort to combat the increasing disparities in terms of wealth and opportunity offered by this evolved form of transnational citizenship. Before discussing Joppke's theory in greater detail, it is useful to at least acknowledge that the concept of citizenship as it is commonly considered today did not arise until relatively recently. Though notions of citizenship explicitly tied to a particular nation-state can be traced
P1 – Explain the range of meanings attached to citizenship, diversity and the associated terminology
Nicole Rodriguez July, 10, 2016 Fox, C. (2012). Three worlds of relief: Race, immigration, and the American welfare state from the Progressive Era to the New Deal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Ch.11.Only). Analytic Summary
III- Citizenship and the Rights granted with it (Document C, speech by Claudius, Emperor of Rome 48 CE and other various sources)
The Populist movement was the most distinguished reform movement of the late nineteenth century, totalling more than one million popular votes during the election of 1892. The Populist movement was a product of a social movement that was created in response to the changes in the American economy and society during the 1890s. Despite the fact that they died out that same century, some of their ideas lived on with the Progressives of the early twentieth century. These two movements both were based on the people’s dissatisfaction with government and its failure to deal effectively with the problems of the day. While the Progressives went beyond the original ideas of the Populist by advocating for social reform, they still succeeded in achieving gains for economic, industrial, and
“A citizen is a political and moral agent who in fact has a shared sense of hope and responsibility to others and not just to him or herself” (Henry Giroux). A good citizen will not only wish for the better of themselves and their loved ones, but also of the entire world as well. A good citizen will stand up for what they consider important. As the quote by Giroux states, it is a responsibility to others as well, as the brave citizen is doing the entire community a favor as well. The analysis included in this paper will allow a reader to fathom what it means to bring change about, to get one’s voice heard, and to stand up for one’s beliefs, hopes and desires. This paper will be proceeded in a manner that not only summarizes the key ideas presented in Soul of Citizen, but also a connection to past events, along with present events and incidents.
Civic involvement and citizenship are common terms used interchangeably in order to describe individual responsibility in society. However, upon further evaluation, both words address different aspects of society itself. Citizenship can be understood as certain obligations, liberties, and privileges embodied by an individual; and civic involvement is the activities associated with those responsibilities. The following definition summarizes the broader scope of citizenship and civic involvement assumed in A Short History of Progress by Ronald Wright. In this book, Wright describes the progress of citizenship, and the perception that mankind gradually improves over time.
Responsible citizenship involves preventing the growth of the negative components of society; however, mankind’s progress has grown to the point where it is negative to society. The idea of progress creates an image of society improving and heading towards a perfect
Freedom and citizenship are the foundational concepts of politics. However, there are disagreements among political scientists and philosophers as to how they define those concepts. This article attempts to present a short overview of the idea of freedom and citizenship from a modern political perspective. I focus on the way Thomas Jefferson and Hannah Arendt interpret those concepts and how their interpretations converse with one another.
Jacobson spends a great deal of time analyzing the way in which ideas about citizenship played into changing perceptions about race and whiteness at the turn of the Twentieth Century. This is expressed in the constant evaluation of a given group’s “fitness for self-government” and how this concept was used to promote inferiority among particular “races” and thus maintain traditional power relations. Jacobson states that “citizenship and whiteness were conjoined,”(p.29) and in saying so he is commenting on the very foundations of the American power structure as it took on the task of deciding who would be entitled to the rights and privileges of being American. It is to this point that further discussion of gender is necessary. If citizenship is understood as being fundamentally connected to the right to participate in democracy then it must be noted that this right was systematically denied to women as well as non-whites at the turn of the Twentieth Century. Therefore to truly benefit from the privileges of American citizenship one need not only be white but also male, a reality that is not expressed in Jacobson’s analysis. By not including a further analysis on gender, Jacobson leaves the reader with the impression that race relations operated independent of gender relations, when in fact sexuality was deeply connected to the construction of racial identities. Jacobson
Citizenship will always be a relevant concept because when you are a citizen of a particular country it comes with a sense of belonging. There is a feeling of pride when you become a citizen of a country. In particular, if your family is from that country it can help to gain a sense of community with those around you. It is important for people to feel that they are citizens of the same country as their children. Sometimes legal citizenship changes a person’s perspective and they feel that they belong but often there is still a chance people may be excluded based on external factors, for example, they have a different religion to the majority of a particular community. That’s why it is important for people to be social citizens as well so that they can
When America joined WWI, American patriotism became an essential aspect of society because those who were not proud of their country were not true patriots. Because of this, immigrants were widely questioned about their devotion to the nation and had to assimilate themselves into “American culture”. However, the nation was known as a melting pot, so it was argued
According to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, a “citizenship is the common thread that connects all Americans” (“Citizenship Rights and Responsibilities”). However, regardless of possessing a citizenship, there is an apparent divide in race, highlighted in Claudia Rankine’s Citizen: An American Lyric, as the author exposes the daily experiences of having dark skin in the United States, which can strip the feeling of being American for people. For every citizen to feel like a true citizen of America, a citizenship should not be the only “thread that connects all Americans” (“Citizenship”). Rather, each citizen should have the common feeling of belonging to society, which is accomplished by people fulfilling their
This from of citizenship arose in the Treaty of West Phalli that ended the one hundred year war. The treaty stated that each state had economic sovereignty and control over its’ territorial boundaries. This form of citizenship is a way in which to delineate individuals of one nation from another. The concepts for which this form of citizenship is based on were created over four hundred years ago and are no longer an adequate way of looking at citizenship. Globalization and interdependence among various nations has challenged the idea of national sovereignty.
The Valley of the Kings is located on the west bank of the Nile River, across from the ancient city of Thebes, which is now the modern city of Luxor (1). This location may also have been chosen because of the naturally formed pyramid called ‘al-Qurn' which dominates the valley (2).
Tyrian purple, founded most notably in Tyre, an ancient Phoenician city, is the pigment that begat the association between purple and royalty. The color was made by crushing the bodies of thousands of mollusks—just for an ounce of pigment over 250,000 of the creatures needed to be crushed, which explains the extreme expense of the color and its association with royalty. A clear fluid was extracted from these organisms which eventually transformed into purple on exposure to light and air. The color was exorbitant in price being at one time worth more than gold. Apart from its associations with royalty, the color, which ranged from more blue to more red, had strong associations with blood. The chemical makeup of Tyrian purple is strikingly related to the chemical pigment found in pea plants in India.