Some people may argue that the influx of higher education is a good thing. More people are becoming knowledgeable, they are able to make informed decisions, and the country will be regarded higher than others. In regards to those and the fact that we are fulfilling the definition of a knowledge society, yes,the influx of higher education is a good thing. But in regards to learning communities and how they operate, no, the influx of higher education is not necessarily a good thing. More learning communities are formed daily(good thing) but with this comes more stress and pressure on the boundaries of all learning communities. If the community is pulled in too many directions it can be disastrous.
America’s economic society affects America’s knowledge society. If the economic society is doing well, the knowledge society is doing well. If the economic society is doing bad, the knowledge society is performing poorly. Winston’s theory ties in to an article that Janet Lorin and Jeanna Smialek wrote for Bloomberg Business. In “College Graduates Struggle to Find Employment Worth a Degree”, the two women discuss unemployment rates and the affect they have on college graduates. They discuss how the inflation of college degrees has led to graduates settling for any work that
…show more content…
The article displays studies that show there are an increasing amount of college graduates that cannot find jobs. This is due to the influx of education in today's society. A source for Newsweek explains that “They don’t want to pay you extra for your master’s. There are enough people with master’s degrees that they can require them” (McGrath Goodman). While it may be more valuable to get a higher education, is it becoming harder to get a job in the career field that you
Because having a degree has become so common, employers now use it as a way to eliminate people who would not make good candidates for employment—even if a degree isn’t a totally accurate determinant of one’s talent or work skills. The mass availability of college education may actually “debase its intrinsic value” (Bankston, p. 338).
A job requires skill and knowledge. Murray says, “ The increase in wealth in American society has increased the demand for all sorts of craftsmanship… work of specialized skills in stonework, masonry, glazing, painting, cabin making, machining, landscaping, and a dozen other crafts” (Murray 236). Murray says that college will not provide the skill set for these jobs. College is where. Murray wants these type of people with low academic ability to shoot for one job and not move from that occupation or move up the ladder. Sanford J. Ungar in “The New Liberal Arts” makes a counter argument saying “It is far wiser for students to prepare for change and the multiple careers they are likely to have than to search for a single job track that might one day become a dead end ” (Ungar 191). During the economic recession, many workers in the manufacturing industry were laid off without a guarantee that they would be rehired in the future or that their positions would still be available. Unfortunately some of these jobs will never come back because the positions have been modernized. Non-stop robotic arms have replaced humans in the assembly line, which have financially benefited the companies. The advancement in technology has brought the world to a state where skilled labor jobs are not needed as much as others such as jobs in computer information systems or computer networking. Ungar brings up Geoffery Grain, president of the Hart Research who says that the responsibility of higher education today is to prepare people “ for jobs that do not yet exist” (Ungar 191). Higher education will always be beneficial now or in the future, it will never be a
White is using good sources, that she is respected in her field, and that this is a timely article. What about the conclusion she draws? The data she uses appears incontrovertible. She uses two graphs from the Georgetown study that are eye opening. The first, on rates of unemployment, shows that having a bachelor’s degree makes you less likely to be unemployed than all workers by two percent, and 4% less likely than a high school graduate with experience. The second graph, demonstrating earnings by education, vividly shows how much more you earn with more education. Recent college grads enter the market at slightly higher wages than experienced non-degree holders, but the experienced non-degree holders top out there, while the degree holders go up in yearly earnings with more education and experience (White). I can’t put it any better than Ms. White
In the article I read the college degree has become the new high school degree it talked about how B.A are become the new high school degree. It talks about how there has been a lot of degree inflation and that jobs are looking for people with higher degrees now. Alos, it talks about how much harder it is to get a job because so many more people go to college now days and get their B.A or higher and there are so many to pick from for companies. It also talks about how it is easier to get a job if you go into certain field that isn't too big and general. It also talks about how you need a B.A for the most menial jobs which i think is kind of pointless because some jobs are just common sense. I also think we need to start appreciating people
There are other options for people like skilled trades. According to the article, “Too many degrees are a waste of money. The return on higher education would be much better if college were cheaper” (Par 1). The cultural value is hard subjects pay off. In the article, it points out two different perspectives of degrees and; an engineering degree and an arts and humanities degree. Engineering is “Unsurprisingly, engineering is a good bet wherever you study it” (Par 6). While arts and humanities degrees “all doubtless nourish the soul, but not all fatten the wallet” (Par 7). The cultural norm is with a college degree makes a person successful. Which in, and the article says that “American schoolkids pondering whether to take on huge student loans are constantly told that college is the gateway to the middle class” (Par 3). But overall can college really help a student’s future, or can it hurt
The American System transpired after the War of 1812. The need to protect the United States economy against outside influence and control became evident. A group of politicians, led by Henry Clay and John Calhoun developed an economic plan that believed that the federal government should encourage economic enterprise. The center of this new plan wanted to keep American products in the United States. The American System fell under the Market Revolution, where economic and social changes took place between the years 1812 - 1868 (Schultz, n.d.). They felt the federal government should encourage internal enterprise by creating internal improvements, establish secure economic institutions, and high tariffs. Internal improvements consisted of creating new ways to move goods
Many jobs recently are requiring people to have at least a bachelor’s degree to even consider someone for a position. Now jobs are beginning to want people who have a master’s degree instead; for example “between 1973 and 2008, the share of jobs in the U.S. economy which required postsecondary education increased from 28 percent to 59 percent. According to our projections, the future promises more of the same. The share of postsecondary jobs will increase from 59 to 63 percent over the next decade” (Carnevale, pg 1). With that being said it seems more important know than ever for people to have a college
There are many different economic systems around the world that are tailored to fit the needs of each and every country. Command Economy, Mixed Economy, Market Economy, Traditional Economy and Free Enterprise are a few. These systems help round and establish our world today and create our future.
In the capitalist-driven society of the United States, there is a constant impetus towards expansion, investment, and maximization of profits. While this system has helped the US become one of the wealthiest countries in the world it has also contributed to a widening gap between the wealthiest and poorest members of society. This essay will examine two of the poorest populations in the United States, the Central Appalachian region of Kentucky and the population in Camden, New Jersey through the lens of two 20/20 segments reported by Diane Sawyer: “Waiting on the World to Change” and “A Hidden America: Children of the Mountains”. This essay will examine the interplay between economic life and family structure in these regions, and how this interplay shapes individual behavior.
Globalization is a very pressing issue in the American culture today. Within any economy, globalization will cause many problems while at the same time solving many others. This is true because there are many factors involved with globalization, one of the most important being job outsourcing. While at first glance and from what the media reports, job outsourcing is definitely not healthy for the economy. However on upon closer inspection, the reverse may be true. Job outsourcing, though initially stressing on the workforce, is helpful in creating a strong economy.
It is often wondered how the superpowers achieved their position of dominance. According to time magazine, to be a superpower, a nation needs to have a strong economy, an overpowering military, immense international political power, and related to this, a strong national ideology. Three of the articles that impacted me the most were: As U.S. economy slows down, Profits Rise in Pressure on U.S. Owned Factories in Mexico Border Zone, and last but not least Poverty in American. There is no doubt that the American economy has change dramatically since the 1860’s.
Throughout American history, the role of the government in the economy has been increasingly brought to the forefront. This is because there are conflicting views about their responsibilities in these areas. As they are one component, that will have an impact on growth and the ability of private enterprises to expand. Yet, limiting their amounts of influence has always been a critical factor with many firms claiming that they can overregulate different areas. (Langran, 2007, pp. 4 10) ("Over Regulated in America," 2012)
The basis of economic capitalism is a countries government allowing private entities to produce what they like and sell to whomever they choose. In America we have a capitalistic system which helps to produce jobs, generate wealth and economic growth, and pay taxes which are used for such things as welfare, social security, health, education, and national defense. Unfortunately, there are many corporations that have found loopholes in our governments taxing system or use unethical means of obtaining wealth. Merriam-Webster defines greed as the intense and selfish desire for something, especially wealth, power, or food. Corporate greed has been linked to the destruction of the American middle class and its consequences are dire.
The American system was defined by all the comprehensive economic plans ("the major economic inactivities debated by the Congress after the world war of 1812 which were the National bank, Federal tariffs, and federally- financed roads, bridges, ports and canals- all being interrelated pieces" (p. 399)) which was designed to give the entire nation a proper economic stand. This was brought about by approving the second Bank of the United States ( B.U.S) (p.394, 395, 396), the Tariff of1816 for protection, and also internal improvements that were sponsored federally. The people belonging to other parts of the country had complaints about the economic policies that they had received. Slavery became an issue again in new territories the onset of
The United States is currently experiencing a slow recovery from the recession of 2008-09. The current unemployment rate is 7.7%, which is the lowest level since December of 2008 (BLS, 2012). However, this rate is believed to higher than the rate that would occur if the economy was operating at peak efficiency, and it is also believed that there are structural issues still underpinning this performance. For example, the number of Americans who have exited the work force as the result of prolonged unemployment is believed to be higher than usual. In addition, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO, 2012) notes that long-term unemployment of greater than 26 weeks is at a much higher rate than normal, which will have adverse long-run effects on the economy, since workers with long-term unemployment often find their career paths derailed.