History of Criminal Justice In America
America’s Criminal Justice system, it keeps America safe and the criminals at bay. Without any sort of criminal justice system America would be complete chaos. People would commit crimes because there would be no consequences for their actions. However, our laws didn’t just appear out of nowhere, they were created and molded to colonial America.
America's Criminal Justice system started during colonial America. With the early colonists coming from Europe, France, and the Dutch Republic our criminal justice system mirrored theirs until the influences slowly disappeared one by one and we were left with what we call the English common law system. Mens Rea was the very first principle
…show more content…
For the next 550 years law was influenced by guilt. Later on, in English Common law, this theory became “ Actus Reas” which is a guilty act and “Mens Rea” which is a guilty mind. Sir William Blackstone was a legal scholar back in those days who would become the guidance to English and American law. Blackstone guided English and American Law for around 300 years. Many legal principles such as the U.S. Declaration of Independence and Constitution were bounded to Blackstone's Biblical principles. Some of these principles of criminal justice include, justice is compensatory, the judgment under the law is declaratory, and a burden of proof and citizens cannot be treated like criminals unless they have been tried and convicted as criminals. The English Common Law System established a set of rules to solve issues that arose within society. This led to the first big distinction between two types of crimes, felonies, and misdemeanors. For more serious crimes a grand jury composed of members of the community decided if there was enough evidence to prosecute, but, no attorneys or public prosecutors …show more content…
However, Sheriffs were paid mostly from tax collecting and such high powers allowed corruption to sneak into the system easily. Next to come along were the judges. Judges were rarely professionals, most were political or religious leaders believing their role in the community was to enforce God’s will. Serious crimes were handled by multiple judges and latter courts which rarely met up, slowing down the judging. What would a judge be without a court? Colonial courts were almost identical to England's. The courts would hear the altercations between locals, they held legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the county's government. Unfortunately, courts were not very useful when handling legal business as the courts with more than one judge seldom set up meetings. The legal process in colonial America went like this, a crime was reported, then a judge would look at the evidence and decide if it was really a crime or not if the judge agreed it was a crime the person accused of the crime was taken in and sent to be questioned. Unlike today no lawyers were involved from either party. The accused was usually then released until trial. At trial, the defense attorney was there but didn’t really do anything. The district attorney was ordinarily chosen by the governor handed the prosecution. The district attorney in
The criminal justice system is comprised of a basic formation, the law enforcement agencies, the courts, and the correctional services. This system has existed since ancient times and although the three facilities haven’t completely been replaced over the centuries, there has been a lot of change and amendment to how the system is used to investigate, deter, and keep order and control in today’s society. It is a fundamental part of our society and we know that comprehensive, effective, and nondiscriminatory implementation of criminal justice system powers is essential to ending violence, both for freeing individual and for ending the worldwide epidemic of violence
Courts are established social, political, and judicial institutions necessary for the manifestation of justice and the maintenance of law and order. The courts are part of the judicial branch of government, as outlined in Article III of the United States Constitution. Courts are the arenas in which the law is tried and applied. Judges are the presiding officers of the court. The United States Supreme Court is the most fundamental court because has "the authority to decide the constitutionality of federal laws and resolve other disputes over them," (United States Courts, 2012). This is true even though even though the court does not expressly enforce that law; enforcement is the province of the executive branch.
America’s criminal justice system today is constantly being questioned and scrutinized by citizens. America’s Criminal Justice system is based on morals and beliefs. These original morals and beliefs didn 't come out of anywhere. Europe was a huge influence on America and our criminal justice system. Throughout the years the system has evolved along with our country.
During this nation’s early history the criminal justice system was deeply intertwined and seemingly streamlined. This can be attributed to a number of factors. Possibilities include the number of crimes committed, the criminal justice systems stance on crime or volume of caseloads. A unique aspect of colonial era criminal justice was the process of sentencing, which was invariably associated to the process of conviction. This author finds the interconnectedness distinctive as judges during that period did not ordinarily hold separate and distinct sentencing proceedings in the
In the United States, criminal law and criminal justice are split between the federal government and the states. Laws are set into place, so people have a general understanding of what not to do. Laws help regulate society and helps protect the right of others. When laws are violated, punishment follows. The United States’ legal system follows retributive justice, where the criminal justice’s system is focus on punishment to offenders rather than rehabilitation.
Crime takes place all the time and it is America’s duty to ensure that these criminals are properly punished for their wrongdoings. With rehabilitation, one can not ensure that if given a second chance the criminal will not offend again. We need to confront crime with a proper punishment and that is where retribution comes in. With retribution society appears more secure and crimes of violence decrease. Since it is essential to control violence in society, retribution is essential. Retribution should undoubtedly be favored over rehabilitation in America’s criminal justice system because it enforces the law and ensures justice. Newman as a punishment for crime , “poor results Foundation work for other agencies to tackle crime.” Death leads to the front. Murder they are . Also open to allow them to better everyday in addition, the complex moral crime.
Since the policy was enacted in the early 1990s, three strikes laws have been one of the most controversial issues facing the American criminal justice system. In general, advocates believe that locking up criminals will protect society. Critics believe that three-strike policy can only be effective with offenders that are on their last strikes (Worrall, 2008). However, other critics explain how three-strike laws don’t significantly reduce crime because most criminals mature out of the criminal lifestyle (Worrall, 2004).
The criminal justice system is the set of agencies and processes established by governments to control crime and impose penalties on those who violate laws. The system is not one single criminal justice system in the United States but nevertheless many similar, individual systems. How every particular system works in each area depends on who is in charge of the city, county, state, or federal. Different authorities have different laws, agencies, and ways of managing criminal justice processes. There are two primary systems which are, state, criminal justice systems handle crimes committed within their state boundaries and the federal, criminal justice system handles crimes committed on federal property or in more than one state. Most criminal
“The court finds you guilty on all accounts. You are sentenced to 35 years in federal prison. Court dismissed.” If only justice in America was the same as a hollywood movie, where, in the end, each and every person put on trial receives a true and just verdict. It would be nice if America’s justice system was designed so that “you couldn’t be the next victim of corruption - innocent and sent to prison, or strapped to a table and put to death; or robbed of your life savings by American lawyers” (Sachs, America’s Corrupt Legal). Welcome to the new America, where all it takes is pockets as deep as the Pacific Ocean to be innocent and poverty to be found guilty, thrown in jail, and not given a second thought. Although America often prides itself on its just ways of governing and dealing with potential criminals, the justice system is often corrupted because of social issues, ethical issues, corrupt officials, and control of the press.
In the United States the criminal justice system does not always create policies that affect everyone equally. There are many policies that seem to target a specific group of people, whether this is intentional or not is beside the point. The important thing is to change the criminal justice system in order to stop race disparities. Marc Mauer in his lecture speaks of the reason for the disparity between races when it comes to the incarceration rate, as well as steps that can be taken in order to elevate, and or stop the disparity in the criminal justice system. Other topics that Mauer covers are the impact that policies can have on a specific group in the United States, and the overwhelming disproportion when it comes to drug arrest, and the people who get arrested.
The Criminal Justice System in the United States of America was established with noble intentions. The basis of the system can be traced back from the first book of the Bible Genesis, and the story of Cain and Able. The criminal justice system was established to be morally suitable for a growing diverse society. Moral dilemmas within the system arise from concerns related to principles of officials’ right and wrong behavior. These principles are often embedded into a culture of the human character, in other words, viewed as essential to the criminal justice system. This biblical story mentioned above has defined the way justice has been administered for thousands of years. The quote "Eye for an eye" continues to be the standard
Now that we have a general understanding of Criminal Law, we can begin our comparison. For this comparison, I have chosen to compare the Criminal Justice systems of the United States of America and the United Kingdom. Thought these two countries have differences in their systems, they also share some similarities. In the USA, states have defined their own individual laws and maintain individual court systems. The UK has a similar situation with laws determined and courts maintained by areas such as Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland to name a few. Both systems utilize the common law or case law system. This means that the prior judgments of courts will help decide current and future cases as well. One glaring difference is the Constitution we have in the United States. The UK does not have a Constitution or a central document like this to draw legislation from and use as a guide the way we do in this country. In the US, all our laws must abide by the Constitution and not violate our rights defined in this important document. The UK relies strictly on legislation and case
The importance of criminal justice system in our society goes without verbally expressing. If you take a glance around without those systems in place crime rates would be at an all-time high. Applied to society, criminal justice is the system that guarantees fairness and equal treatment to any underneath its guidance. The agencies directly or indirectly associated with the criminal justice system have an effect on everything that transpires in our everyday lives. Law enforcement ascertains that laws are being obeyed; judges
Law enforcement have multiple responsible and duties, officers investigate crimes, gather and protect evidence and take reports on various crimes. In addition, officers have the power arrest offenders, and give testimony in court. Thus, law enforcement personnel ensure that charges against offenders are strong enough to stand up in court. The second component of the criminal justice is the courts. This aspect of the criminal justice system includes prosecution and defense lawyers, judges and juries. These individuals make sure and enforce every offender are given fair trials regardless of race, gender, or religion. Judges, also known as
Nowadays every legal system wants to achieve justice. Different legal traditions in the world have given a different meaning of this concept by following one of the two legal systems: a civil law system and a common law system. The civil law system emerged from Roman law and throughout many centuries has been developed in continental Europe and often is called a “continental legal system”, achieving its prominence through development of aqui communitare in Europe. The common law system emerged in England during the Anglo-Saxon period and was developed by British colonies, reaching its peak in the United Kingdom and the United States of America.