Have you ever wondered who would win a battle between the European Knights and Japanese Samurai? Or how different or similar they were, they were very similar in some ways and different in many more. In my opinion, I believe these warriors were very much different they were different in 3 clear reasons! One, their views of death, two their codes of honor and three the way their armour looked like and how it was designed. The differences between the knights and samurai are greater than most realize. Let's start off with one of the most striking differences and that was their feelings about death. Japanese samurai were very calm about their death because they all knew that it was going to come one day. In Document F: Feelings about death, it reads a poem written from a samurai with their feelings about death. the poem was written by Chikamas in c 1400 and it read “ One day you are born you die the next today, at twilight, autumn breezes blow” this shows that samurai know that one day they're are born and the next day they‘re dead. European knights view of death was definitely different. The knights would beg for mercy because …show more content…
According to document E:Codes of Honor, The Code of Bushido (japan) required samurai to have their lords come first to them and didn’t have to be courteous to ladies “in discharging loyal service to his master if he has on, *in deepening his loyalty in associations with friends and in devoting himself to duty above all”. And knights are required to be very courteous to ladies , promised to do no wicked deed and to give mercy to those asking it. “With great ceremony each knight tooks vows to true knighthood, solemnly promising to doi no wicked deed, to be loyal to the king, to give mercy to those asking it always be courteous and helpful to ladies”. These pieces of evidence show that samurai and knights are required to do very different
There are many similarities between the Samurai of medieval Japan and the Knights of medieval Europe, especially considering their training,armor, and codes. For example document A and B discuss the Training about the knights and armor. The first similarity is that they both started their training when they were young and also, they were spiritual. A couple of the Samurais differences is that they wrote poetry secretly and, “became Samurai in a ceremony called genpuku live according to Bushido.”The Knights differences in is that, “pages become squire at age 14 and, Squires become knights at age 21.” Another similarity in document C and D is their Armor Their armor was real heavy and they both wore helmets. Although, Samurai used iron and knights
The samurai the warrior for Japan, they were determined to defend their ruler no matter what the cost is for example torture, Death or imprisonment. The knight was the warrior for Europe. They kept order in Europe when there was none. Even though samurai and knights have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in their armor, training and beliefs.
There are many similarities between the samurai of medieval Japan and the knights of medieval Europe, especially considering their training, armor, and codes. For example, Documents A and B discuss the training endured by the samurai and the knights during the medieval period. There are many similarities in their training that include they both started training at early ages, both trained with wooden weapons (Bamboo sticks/wooden swords), both received religious instruction, both evolved their role at age 14, and both served and looked up to a master. However, both documents also elaborate on the differences between the samurai and knights. The samurai studied poetry and Zen Buddhism and lived according to bushido.
There are many similarities between the samurai of medieval Japan and the knights of medieval Europe, especially considering their training, armor, and codes. For example, Documents A and B discuss the training endured by the samurai and the knights during the medieval period. There are many similarities in their training that include they both started training at early ages, both trained with wooden weapons (Bamboo sticks/wooden swords), both received religious instruction, both evolved their role at age 14, and both served and looked up to a master. However, both documents also elaborate on the differences between the samurai and knights. The samurai studied poetry and Zen Buddhism and lived according to bushido.
The similarities between samurais and knights were greater than the differences due to the similarity in the hierarchy and the armor they used to protect themselves. The Samurai were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to daimyos for land or regular payment.” They made up about 10% of Japan’s population. Similarly, knights were “warriors who owed loyalty and military service to the lord for land.” (Document A) There were about 12,000 knights in England and Normandy, France in the 12th century. Even though Japan and Europe had no communication or access to each other, both areas placed the warrior classes in the middle of the hierarchy and owed loyalty/military services. This shows that the social order of both Feudal Japan and Feudal
How were knights and samurai similar? In Europe and Japan, there were issues that lead to a samurai and knights. The countries' government was not stable and quickly falling apart and so was the military. There were people invading their land and with an unstable government, they needed help before the invaders took over their way of life. Historians believe knights and samurai were different in their feelings about death, but they are more similar. They were both a warrior class and both showed loyalty to their master.
Did you know that the Samurai practiced self-discipline, self sacrifice, obedience, skill, honor, and bravery. The Samurai were Japanese that lived in Japan and the Knights were European warriors that lived in Europe. They both lived more than a thousand years ago. Critics would say that the Samurai and Knights have more similarities, however they had way more differences. The Samurai and Knights had many differences throughout their lives. Military training was a big difference between both groups of warriors. Another big difference was the warfare they both wore.
Samurai and knights were more different than similar, and this can be shown by looking at three areas:samurai are bound to their job, the two fight in different types of warfare, and there were two genders of samurai.
Now we will further explore their Social Position in samurai and knights nations. Well first let's look at a social pyramid on a knight social pyramid, in order it goes, Pope, King, Lords, Lesser Lords, Knights etc. (Document A Social Pyramid) Now let's look at Japan, in order, Emperor, Shogun, Daimyo, Samurai, etc. (Document A Social Pyramid) As you can see they had two very different social positions the knight was 5 places down while the samurai was 4 making the samurai more respected. In (Doc B by Catherine Bloomberg) it tells us of the relationship between warrior and lord. In Japan the relationship is truly
In, document D - The Way of the Samurai, 1600’s: it talks about the code of Bushido and Chivalry. It says (paragraph 1) “ Outwardly he stands in physical readiness for any call to service in inwardly he strives to fulfill the Way….” this shows just how honorable a samurai could be. In Europe it was just the same (paragraph 2) it states “give mercy in those who ask for it” These similarities are significant because loyalty between the two, shows how much they trust each other. Without this trust and loyalty , these countries would be
The 11th and 12th century was a very difficult time for Europe and Japan. After the fall of the Roman Empire, Europe was in trouble. Decline in population, a reduction in construction, and smaller amounts of food were only some of the negative effects. In Japan, the emperor was weakening and daimyos were rising to power. Because of these hard times, both Europe and Japan created a system. In this new feudal system, Europe and Japan each had their version of a warrior. In Japan, the warriors were called samurai, and in Europe the warriors were called knights. Surprisingly, there were extremely similar elements when it came to the two fighters. But we’re the similarities greater than the differences?
The evidence also tells us that they are brave to protect and fight. To add everything up, honor and death were similar for both warriors. Therefore, social position, training and armor and death and honor between the knights and samurai were similar. For example, the samurai and knights both get land as payment. Another example is that both warriors were taken seriously and they had military skills too.
Similarities between samurai and knights were greater than the differences. They both fought for land. They both were very brave warriors. They both were loyal to their lords. They both fought to defend their families. They both were well trained fighters. And they both followed the code of honor.
Samurai and knights are not identical, they do have a good amount of differences. For instance, after going through training, samurai were awarded their title and responsibilities at the age of fourteen while knights took on their full responsibilities at twenty-one. Document B points out that although loyalty was important to both Japanese and European warriors, “loyalty towards the feudal lord in Japan was hereditary” but it was not in Europe. This means that in Japan “service of a feudal lord went from father to son” so the relationship between the lord and his warrior lasted for generations. Along with that, although both groups wore full body armor, Document D states that “a knight’s armor could weigh forty
The Knights of Europe and the Samurai of Japan shared quite a few similarities; however, they do also share many differences. One such similarity would be that both the Knights and the Samurais were brave, strong, and loyal to their cause, especially due to both of their trainings starting at a very young age. An example of a difference would be the samurais having a much lighter armor than knights. This allowed for a more agile army. They also ascended to their titles at separate ages, with samurais being at a mere 14 years of age, and knights being 21.