American Colonies In 1763 Essay

Written by King George III in 1763, the Proclamation Line was one of the first political moves initiated by the British after the cessation of the French and Indian War. The Line sought to stop expansion beyond the Appellation Mountain. The ultimate goal of the British was to stop the conflicts between the colonists and the Native Americans, which were considered as the major cause of the French and Indian War. This was made clear by King George III, and he also emphasized in his proclamation that there would be “four distinct and separate Governments, stiled and called by the Names of Quebec, East Florida, West Florida, and Grenada” (The Gildern Lehrman Collection). However, colonist has seen this move as a

     Between the settlement at Jamestown in 1607 and the Treaty of Paris in 1763, the most important change that occurred in the colonies was the emergence of a society quite different from that in England. Changes in religion, economics, politics and social structure illustrate this Americanization of the transplanted Europeans.

The colonies of New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut made up the New England colonies. Most of the Europeans in the New England colonies were there to escape the religious persecution they faced in England. They practiced a lot of different things in these colonies compared to the middle and southern and colonies of colonial america.

The thirteen colonies started in 1607, before this England tried to do a colony called Jamestown unfortunately it failed to become a colony. Later the king that had tried to start the Jamestown colony died, then in 1607 the new king and queen Elizabeth I decided to try again this time it worked the first colony was called Virginia and was named after Queen Elizabeth I. Virginia was not dominated by a specific religion they welcomed Baptists, Anglicans, and others. The thirteen colonies included Virginia, Delaware, New York, Massachusetts, Maryland, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Hampshire, North Carolina, South Carolina, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Georgia.

The middle colonies liked bread so much their nickname was the breadbaskets the new england mostly focused on religion.

Between the settlement at Jamestown in 1607 and the Treaty of Paris in 1763, the most important change that occurred in the colonies was the extension of British ideals far beyond the practice in England itself. The thirteen colonies throughout time all established themselves and soon developed their own identities. Colonies in different areas were known for different things and no one colony was like the other. These people began to see them selves as Carolinians or Georgians, Quakers or new Englanders. Most of these colonist's no longer saw themselves as being citizens of the mother country, but rather as citizens of their colonies. This is when the colonies began to receive their own identities

Between the years 1763 and 1776, the British enforced many new laws that caused the colonials to deepen their resistance. Some of the new laws that caused an uproar involving the colonist were the Sugar Act , Stamp Act, and eventually the Coercive Acts. I will be talking about the ways the British Parliament laws intensified colonials resistance to British governing and their commitment to republican gain. The Sugar Act was passed by Parliament of Great Britain in April 5, 1764, the Sugar Act was designed by Parliament to raise revenue from the American colonist.

Organized colonial resistance began between the years 1763-1776. The policies of Britain toward their American colonies over this time period escalated tension between the two, and finally led to the rejection of Royal power by the colonies. The British policies caused this outcome because they threatened the colonists’ republican values. These were ideals adapted from the early classical Greek and Roman republics, as well as from laws established by the British. These core beliefs centered strongly on God-given inalienable rights, liberty of the people, and the belief that all should take part in the government. The combination of harsh British policies regarding taxation, settlement and everyday

The relations between England and the British North American colonies could always be considered precarious. Prior to 1750 British essentially followed a policy of benign neglect and political autonomy in the American colonies. (Davidson p.97) The colonies were for the most part content with benign neglect policy, relishing in a “greater equality and representative government”(Davidson p.95) within the colonies. Competition among European Imperial nations began to effect British policy toward North America colonies causing rapid shifts from 1750 to 1776. During this period, the British Empire made a series of policy decision that sealed the fate of the British North American

Right before and throughout the American Revolutionary War there were many acts passed by British Parliament that limited and angered the colonist. To name a few, there was the Stamp Act, Townshend Acts, and Quartering Act. A man named John Dickinson wrote twelve letters expressing his thoughts on acts such as the Townshend acts, they were titled Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania. In his first letter he wrote directly to the colonist that lived amongst him and spoke to them as if he they were equals. The Townshend acts of 1767 imposed taxes on items like glass, paper, and tea. Later in 1770 these taxes were repealed. They were important because they were a key factor in the American revolutionary war that led the colonist to revolt against the British.

Much of Anger throughout North America came from those who were at best minimally impacted by the taxes, in fact most of the angry citizens in Boston worked part-time jobs or were even unemployed. The sugar tax as well as the Stamp act, which put taxes on commercial and legal paper, hardly an important commodity of the lower or middle class, would not have affected them in proportion to their anger. Those that would benefit from the anger and opposition of these groups are the ones that the tax effects the most in the colonies, the upper class as well as those “Representatives from across North America [who] began to gather together in inter-colonial meetings, seeing for the first time their shared interests.” This “shared interest” was no doubt in increasing their hurt revenues through opposition to British rule. This was done by making the colonists place all their misfortunes and anger upon England until “demonstrations and riots were almost regular features of the colonists’ lives” (background, 82). Demonstrations done with “restrained, ritualized, often theatrical violence” and “carefully calibrated conduct” proved to be tactical moves crucial to

The bottom line is that the British wished to use the colonies to advance their own interests and likewise the Colonists wanted the same, and these interests were in conflict with each other. The British parliament passed many acts in an attempt to assert control over the colonies as well as increase revenue from the new world. (Mintz 2016) The views of the British were that they had the right to tax and govern the colonies and the views of the colonists were that because they had no voice in these decisions that they were unjust and a threat to their liberty. (Mintz 2016) In 1765 the British passed the stamp act and colonist’s response was to boycott the products and intimidate its enforcers. (Mintz 2016) The text states, “The Stamp Act made many Americans realize for the first time that the British government could act contrary to the colonies ' interests.” (Mintz 2016) Ultimately this was a war of ideologies and values in conflict, in the colonies so far away from England a new breed of political thought had taken root in an environment where independence was a virtue and men wanted to be free to determine their own lives and conduct them in their own way.

Relationships between the Western European Countries and their American Colonies have always been difficult to maintain due to conflicts occurring to both societies. Although new laws, compromises, and government officials have been established in order to fix the hindered relationships, none seemed to repair the already broken partnerships. The commercial relationships between the American Colonies and the European countries were established to make a profit off the “New World”. However, as the trade continued to grow the greed overwhelmed the government in power over the colonies and was ultimately a factor that hindered the relationship between the colonies and their European country. Poor commercial relationships between the American colonies

Changes in British policies toward the colonies between 1750 and 1776 played paramount in the evolution of relations between British North America and Mother England. Tension between England and the colonies mounted from the conclusion of the Seven Years’ War to the signing of the Declaration of Independence as a result of the several implemented changes imposed by Parliament for the purpose of increasing income and tightening the grip on America.

The infringement upon their liberties to which Richard Henry Lee was referring was largely an economic concern for the colonists. Taxes and duties implemented solely by the British government and the Navigation Acts limited trading rights. The colonists believed that they held the right to tax themselves, especially since there were no Americans in Parliament. After this claim England replied that colonists were represented by “virtual representation” as a result of the Magna Carta. The inferred inferiority of the Americans to Britons by this fallacy insulted colonists and further pushed them into unrest, causing a movement that resulted in the Non-Importation Agreements being enforced The Non-Importation Agreements demonstrated the power of the American colonists over the depressed English economy. Once the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts were repealed, there was no turning back for the seditious Americans; they had discovered who truly was dependent on whom.