preview

Ambrose Bierce's An Occurrence At Owl Creek Bridge

Decent Essays

On April 19, 1861, an 18-year-old boy from southern Ohio enlisted into the 9th Indiana Volunteers to join the Civil War. Many knew him as Ambrose Bierce. His family were strong abolitionists and his uncle even supplied John Brown with weapons during his crusade in Kansas (McWilliams). His experience in the war and the opinions he formed throughout this time period changed the way he viewed many everyday occurrences around him. In “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge,” Bierce uses his views on the war to thematically shape the story by using bias towards one side, using historically correct actions and descriptions, and creating a sense of theme by conveying literary devices to pull readers in. As stated before, Bierce was an abolitionist. In the short story, the only character to die owned slaves. Using this notion, it can be implied that Bierce used his own bias towards the South and the slave owners to write this. Had Bierce been proslavery, the outcome of the story might have been quite different. In comparison, the story focused more on the Confederates and their methods of punishing traitors, like hangings. The common concept of hanging a traitor, as seen in the story, …show more content…

If an author is writing about World War II, he cannot add details from the Spanish American war and pretend it works. In “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge,” Bierce had to make sure every fact and opinion supported the storyline and its historical outcome. As stated in the text in Chapter II, “[Peyton Fahrquhar] was naturally an original secessionist and ardently devoted to the southern cause,” it reveals that Fahrquhar is a Confederate supporter who would do anything for his troops. This was a very popular philosophy for many civilians in the South during this time period. He also states, “He was a Federal scout.” The story displays the normal events that a scout would go through to find enemy encounters at all

Get Access