The Alltel Pavilion Case Analysis
To: The Alltel Pavilion Management
From: Team2
Date: 09/17/2012
Subject: The Alltel Pavilion Strategy and CVP Analysis
In this memo, we use CVP analysis to explore strategy for negotiating with different types of artists and for realizing the business target under various conditions.
The ALLTEL Pavilion in North Carolina is an outdoor amphitheater that provides about 40 concerts to the public per year. The past operating period shows negative results. The management’s aim is to forge a better strategy to realize their goals in terms of their budget and sign contracts with different artists.
Although the financial goal is to create profit, we need to calculate the breakeven point to get started.
…show more content…
Exhibit 5 shows the breakdown of fixed costs. Exhibit 6 shows corresponding contribution margin for compensation based on a fixed fee as well as a 100% variable fee. If we assume Alltel would pay the talent 90% of ticket prices, which would vary slightly depending on talent, while maintaining the same facilities charge and service charge, the total contribution margin drops form $37 per paying customer to just over $15.While this is not ideal, the benefit is the reduction in up front expenses required. By going to 100% variable compensation Alltel no longer has a substantial fixed cost associated with paying the talent. Since Alltel only received ~10% of sales, we would suggest Alltel no longer handle the promoting, saving them another $20k in fixed advertising cost. The talent would now be in charge of the promotion. They would have the most to gain from the promotion as they would retain 90% of sales. Hiring a promoter would have its own ROI calculation and Alltel could certainly continue to offer the services but with a fixed price outsourced model or affiliate variable compensation model negotiable with each event. Alltel is not a true promoter and this would allow them to focus attention on their core business and let true promoters promote. The net result of this is a contribution margin 38% and a breakeven of 5264 paying customers. This is down from the previous breakeven of 8341. We would describe this process of
Determine the unit break-even point, assuming fixed costs are $60,000 per period, variable costs are $16.00 per unit, and the sales price is $25.00 per unit.
Triple E’s main clients will be local area businesses who require access to marketing and event planning services but have no marketing/planning departments of their own. By focusing on businesses that have these specific needs, Triple E Marketing and Events will be able to provide smaller organizations access to comprehensive and combined event planning and marketing strategies, allowing them to create brand recognition and increased profitability for their businesses.
BPQ2: My potential customers are major touring artists that play big ticket shows very frequently.
In order to calculate the breakeven point, we use the following equation and budget data:
By following the same format as the previous survey, the VSO gained no new knowledge as to what will increase ticket sales. Lowering price may help, but other factors such as music that people would like to hear but the VSO doesn’t offer, wasn’t collected. The VSO again wasted their money conducting a convenience sample where results are biased and questionable.
Based on the Excel Problem of chapter one, if the total capacity for this business is 725 will you stay in it? If you want to stay in it what price you need to obtain a break even point of 725?
The third viable alternative for the festival is to use the market penetration strategy. It has been observed that a lot of people have been unable to attend the festival because of out-of-reach places and scarcity of tickets. Thus, if the
There are some limitations of break-even as well. For example, it cannot give accurate results if the data used for it is predicted. Data such as change in direct cost
Pace Entertainment and Cellar Door Inc. of Raleigh, NC had the initial contract to manage the Pavilion. Hardee’s Food Systems, Inc. of Rocky Mount, NC, the original sponsor of the amphitheater, paid an annual fee to carry its name and logo on all signs and ads regarding the amphitheater. On February 3, 1999 ALLTEL Corp (http://tel.com) became the title sponsor for the amphitheater. The demand for the outdoor facility came about because the rapidly growing city of Raleigh lacked a major entertainment complex. In the late 1980s Pace Entertainment and the city of Raleigh came to an agreement to build the facility. The city of Raleigh would own the land while Pace Entertainment would own the facility and assume sole operations of the facility; Cellar Door would do the booking for all the concerts. Pace Entertainment would pay income taxes on earnings from the use of the facility. In 1998, SFX Entertainment Inc. acquired Pace Entertainment Inc. The amphitheater facility and its employees became part of SFX Entertainment Inc. Also, in 1999 SFX Entertainment Inc. acquired Cellar Door Inc. and merged with Clear Channel Communications Inc., one of the largest owners of radio stations in the country. This move brought together both worlds of the entertainment business. While the company has diverse holdings, the philosophy of SFX is “One Company, One Mission.” Many companies that are now owned by SFX were at one time bitter rivals in the
This question gives students an opportunity to exercise their ability to interpret break-even analyses. Key teaching points should include explaining the preparation of a break-even chart, the interpretation of the break-even volume (938,799 hectoliters [HL]), and the comparison of the break-even volume to the current volume (1,173,000 HL). Another key point is that the chart in case Exhibit 5 is relevant only for the current cost structure of the company—if variable costs increase or the plant expansion is approved, the break-even volume will rise. Finally, students should be aided in understanding that “break-even” refers to operating profit, not free cash flow. The typical use of the break-even chart ignores taxes, investments, and the depreciation tax shield.
The internal sales data showed that the business would need $45,000 in monthly revenue to break even. The sales forecast which have been prepared keep in mind a 65% gross margin, however, based on actual figure for 2009, this target has not been reached, and the forecasted sales have fallen.
When we reviewed Ticketmaster internally, we looked at the firm value chain, the core competencies that exist, Ticketmaster’s technology, and the social and legal challenges that may exist. The firm’s value chain and core competencies are its paper tickets, etickets, and their box office
When price is $20.6, the quantity is 1,242,425 and profit is $101, we come near to break even point.
New technology: Internet (60% of seats were booked on-line), paperless operation, computerized, Reservation operation (not using call center)
While cost is seldom the only criterion used in a make-or-buy decision, simple break-even analysis can be an effective way to quickly surmise the