Alexander the Great was known to be a fierce man, whose main focus was his thirst for conquest to expand his empire, but according to Hammond, Alexander was a “statesmanlike vision”, whose charming personality and intellect earned him the appreciation and respect of his subjects (Hammond, Preface). To his advantage Alexander used intellect and personality to overcome nationalism and racism to build his great empire, proving his devotion and leadership qualities. In N.G.L. Hammond’s book, The Genius of Alexander the Great, Hammond refrains from writing about Alexander’s achievements, conquests, and struggles throughout his career from a biased point of view. Hammond’s main purpose for writing this book is to evaluate the life of Alexander in …show more content…
Although enemies of both Alexander and Attila would agree that both were barbaric and brutal when in combat, their strategies of conquering others differed in many ways. Alexander’s main focus was bloodshed and to expand his empire, and to do so he would exhaust his army for approximately eight years. One of Alexander’s biggest conquests was the Battle of Granicus, fought May 334 BC and also one of the battles he came closest to failure and death. Alexander’s second in command, Parmenion made critical suggestions to strike against the Persians, but Alexander attacked immediately, catching the Persians off guard. The casualties for the Persians compared to the Greeks were outstanding and being the brutal king he was Alexander slaughtered and enslaved those who weren’t killed (Hammond, 115). Unlike Alexander, Attila preferred to be more cautious on his conquests and use political maneuvers and maintain as many allies as he could get rather than risking Hun forces. While both conquerors had different motifs, they were both brilliant when it came to strategizing on the battlefield. Just as Alexander the Huns were at a disadvantage when it came to modern day weaponry. So they had to depend on their rapid movements to catch their enemies off guard (Judge, 195). Both conquerors were experts at organizing their armies to preform certain battle maneuvers, making up their forces, and managing their army during the
Alexander the Great was king of the Macedonians and one of the greatest generals in history. As a student of the Greek philosopher Aristotle, Alexander was embedded with lasting interests in philosophy, politics and warfare. As king, he settled problems by immediate action, making quick decisions and taking great risks. His armies overcame these risks by sheer force and by the ingenious tactics instilled in them by Alexander. He and his armies conquered the Persian Empire, which stretched from the Mediterranean Sea to India and formed much of what was then considered the civilized world. Through his conquests, Alexander helped spread Greek ideas, customs and laws throughout Asia and Egypt and adopted a uniform
Alexander the Great, born of King Philip of Macedonia, was one of the greatest conquerors of history. In my opinion, Alexander was a great leader and warrior. For example, in Document B, Alexander used strategy to win over a battle. The strategy he used was complicated, but well thought out; Alexander moved his troops in all different directions to keep Porus puzzled, and took his cavalry to various points along the river bank where he would create a war cry so that Porus would parallel the movements on the other sides of the river until he no longer responded. Now Porus elephants were boxed in, and the elephants trampled their own men because they had no driver's upon them. In this way Alexander won a battle, and through his cleverness, he
included Greek Culture, this also shows how greek culture advanced, which also expanded it in the process. Advancing Greek culture is the other reason Alexander was experienced.
Alexander the Great named 11 cities his name to never be forgotten and to show he was the greatest. 356 BCE is when Alexander the Great was born in Macedonian. King Philip II was Alexander's father. Once Alexander's father died he proceeded to conquer Persia. Around the age 30 Alexander died from serious illness and died less than 10 days after being diagnosed with the illness. How Great was Alexander The Great? Alexander was great because he was a military genius and spread greek culture
This definition perfectly depicts the battle strategies that Alexander the ‘Great’ used in war. Peter Green’s research out of UCLA is useful in illustrating Alexander’s homicidal tendencies (Document C). Green’s work describes the terrible effect Alexander had on the citizens of Tyre, mercilessly taking the lives of 7,000 people through the burning of their buildings, selling 30,000 citizens into slavery, and crucifying 2,000 men. This terrible act even alarmed the Sidonians, who were allies to Alexander and enemies to the citizens of Tyre. Also, according to the records of the philosopher and historian Lucius Flavius Arrianus written in the year 130, Alexander used the strategy of confusing the elephants of a prince named Porus to win his last major battle, however, though Porus’s army was trampled and killed by the elephants, the same fate was bestowed upon Alexander’s men.
Alexander was great with military and conquered a lot is shown in (Doc A) shows in the map he conquered a lot of land in only 10 years. (Doc B) shows that he was great with military and conquered a lot because he tricked Porus by acting like he was going to attack then not actually attacking he kept on doing that until he did not react then he attacked and it caught him off guard. He also used Porus’s elephant’s against him by trapping them and then the elephants would run over Porus’s men. (Doc C) shows Alexander was great with military and conquered a lot because he conquered a unconquerable city. (Doc E) shows Alexander was great with military and conquered a lot because it shows that he conquered almost as much as the Roman Empire at its finest in only ten years witch was around 2,000,000 square miles. In the documents it shows that Alexander the Great was great with military and conquered a lot. he tricked Porus by doing the boy who cried wolf witch really tricked Porus witch shows he was great with military. In (Doc C) it shows that Alexander the Great conquered a unconquerable city witch I think is pretty amazing. Alexander the Great conquered around 2,000,000 square miles in ten years said (Doc E) that was almost the size of the Roman Empire at its finest witch is a pretty big achievement in my
Alexander the Great being so strategic and patient in his attacks was one of the biggest reasons why the Macedonian empire was so
Alexander the Great conquered a lot of land and showed many qualities of a great leader. Alexander became king of Macedonia in 323 BC at age 20, after his dad died. Alexander took on his dad's legacy of conquering Persia and continued conquering land. Alexander the Great deserves this title because he spread Greek culture throughout the Ancient world, he had great leadership skills, and great military tactics and leadership.
Alexander III, known as Alexander the Great, is a name that the majority of people have come across, even thousands of years after his death. He was given the name “Alexander the Great” because of all his contributions in making the Persian empire veer in a completely different direction in such a short amount of time. Great amounts of people believe that he was deserving the that title. I, however, think that he should not have been awarded that title. I believe that he was not deserving of “the great” because he was cruel, his empire didn’t last, and all his actions were very extra and unnecessary.
The clearest evidence of this lies in Document C, entitled Alexander of Macedon by Peter Green and published by the University of California Press in 1991. This excerpt describes one of the many brutal rampages that Alexander’s troops embarked on, this time against Tyre, under their leader’s orders. His commands were “executed with savage relish” and even the men of Sidon, who had been rivals with the Tyrians for centuries, were “horrified by what they now witnessed”. Those who sought refuge were slayed, buildings were burned down, thousands of men at military age were crucified, and even survivors that surrendered were eventually enslaved. Therefore, Alexander was undoubtedly a relentless and power-hungry military leader that would have done anything in order to further himself and his plans. Moreover, Document B, written by Lucius Flavius Arrianus in 130 CE, also, though unintentionally, displays Alexander’s cruelty. Taken from Arrianus’s book called The Campaigns of Alexander, the story was supposed to be a recount and positive reflection of Alexander’s accomplishments, given that it was written by a Greek philosopher and historian. However, it, instead, is even further proof that Alexander was anything but great. The document narrates Alexander’s last major battle against Porus on the eastern bank of the Hydaspes
Alexander the Great was well known for his amazing achievements. Alexander’s father died when he was only 20 years old, so he became the king. He was born in Macedonia in 356 B.C.E., in a kingdom near the northern edge of Greece (BGE). When he died he had conquered 70 cities within 10 years (Doc E). Alexander thought so highly of himself that he thought he could conquer Persia, Asia Minor, Egypt, and many other places (BGE). Was Alexander the Great as intelligent and encouraging as people said he was? He was great for these 3 reasons he founded many cities, he was brave, and he spread Greek culture throughout many different places!
“There is nothing impossible to him who will try” This quote comes from Alexander the Great. Alexander had inherited the empire after his father was assassinated in 336 BCE (BGE) He was only 20 years old, but very eager to follow in his father plan to attack the Persian Empire. During the time of King Philip's death, the Persian Empire was very powerful, so Alexander has to stay strong and lead his troops to victory. As they defeated to Persian, Alexander took over the power that King Darius had (BGE).
Many people fail to realize that Alexander has had a definite affect on us today, although not as great as he would have had on people of the past. In most parts the world today, Alexander The Great is considered a legend; however, in some places, Alexander is considered a god. One of the most notable people in history, Alexander has reached an iconic status in our world today. He possibly may have even been referred to in the Quran (Surah 18:89-98). There are still many stories told about him including folktales, and movies. In modern Iran, Alexander is still known as an evil king who nearly destroyed the ancient Persian culture and religion. Although the effect of “Alexander Mania” has died down since the time of his reign, you can still see the mark that he has left on today’s world.
There are many leaders in the world, but a great ruler is passionate, honorable and one who can inspire even in the most hopeless circumstances. Alexander the Great was a great ruler. Alexander the Great was a ruler that was not only inspiring, but he was fearless, smart, bold and courageous. Alexander the Great inspired his soldiers to crave more. He has inspired people since the day he started ruling. What is inspirational about Alexander the Great is that he inspired his troops to the point that they did not question him when they were outnumbered three to one in a battle, they trusted him with their lives and were willing to die for him (Alexander the Great: man behind the legend).
During the course of his life and reign, Alexander had fought and won many battles and wars, defeating many kings and warlords throughout the ancient world. Perhaps his most recognized conquest was of the Achaemenid Empire of Persia and its ‘King of Kings’ Darius III during the Battle of Issus 1. After defeating the Persians at the Battle