Alexander The Great Dbq

Secondly, Alexander wasn’t great because he was ruthless. In Document E it states, “Estimated enemy soldiers and civilians killed in four major battles was 100,000” (Doc. E). The documents proves that Alexander wasn’t great because that was only the number of enemies of Alexander, and it didn’t include his own soldiers he forced to go into 4 major battles, probably killing thousands of soldiers each battle. He also went and killed innocent civilians who had nothing to do with the fighting, but were still killed in the battle. In addition, Document B stays, “...Alexander then threw his calvary in a circle around the entire force, and ordered the infantry to lock shields, to group tightly and to advance as a phalanx…” (Doc. B). This fact proves

Alexander should not have been called great, because of the many people he killed, and the land he

Also he thought highly of himself, like he thought that he was a god. Some people ask themselves was Alexander really great, yes he is. Alexander was great for these reasons, his leadership ,cared for others ,and his military strategy. Alexander was great because he showed leadership. Alex had 40,000 men fighting for hims during the wars he had.(Doc.

One thing about Alexander that was not great was his ruthlessness. In ‘Document D’ it states that Alexander had taken his troops into the desert with almost barely any supplies at all. This fact suggests, that Alexander did not consider his own troops wellbeing or his own when he is set on his goal of conquering the world. ‘Document B’ states that when Alexander boxed in the elephants, the elephants inflicted pain upn to Porus’s

For example, Alexander fought 4 battles during his conquest. If he was great, he would have fought 1 or none (Document A). Even though Alexander founded many towns, he could of made a peace treaty, or formed an alliance with the cities he fought. Alexander was also a cruel soldier. He ordered many men to slaughter soldiers

Is Alexander the Great, the Great? Alexander the Great is one of the best military leaders to ever exist. Alexander had courage, intelligence, and a remarkable feat. He conquered around 2,200,000 square miles of land. He also figured out how to beat multiple strong enemies.

Who was Alexander the Great? Was he really great? Alexander was he king of the massive empire of Greece. He was the king of Macedonia and was 20 when he got his fathers empire. He expanded his empire from Egypt to India. Sadly died about 10 years after he got the empire. Alexander was great for these reasons, his remarkable achievements, his selflessness, and Tenacious.

Did you know that Alexander the Great at his death conquered around 2,000,000 square miles that is almost the size as the Roman Empire at its finest. Did you also know that Alexander the Great had 2,000 military age men executed for no reason.Alexander the Great was a great man because he was great with military and conquered a lot also had great leadership skills but he had a big ego and was self centered. He was born 356 BCE and died 323 BCE and was 32 when he died he had a great Empire of around 2,000,000 square miles. In 15 years of battles he never lost one after Alexander died his Empire stayed up for only 10 more years but it only took him 10 years to make. Alexander founded 70 city’s in just that ten years. Alexander the Great but not

Do you ever wonder if Alexander the great was great? Alexander was great because he’s a military genius and an inspiring leader, and he speared culture. Alexander the great wasn’t always great. He did stuff in little time too.

Alexander recognized he could not allow the barbarian nation neighboring him grow to independent so he quashed them with the might of his army. (Doc. 1) It became obvious that the author who was responsible for writing Document 1 was biased towards Alexander when the author wrote that ONLY thirty-four of Alexander's men were killed. Alexander said that he shared the labor with his men and would not have had them do anything he would not do. (Doc. 2) When Alexander took the Persian capital of Persepolis he took the treasure from the palace and burned it to the ground. With this move, he effectively cut down upon the Persian's supplies and stroke a crippling blow to the moral of Persia's army. (Doc. 4) When Alexander and his forces were marching through a desert one of his men found a little bit of water and offered it to Alexander, when he took it he promptly dumped it all on the ground so that he could suffer along with his

Alexander the Great was a successful leader and warrior, starting to lead around 336 BCE. While his name suggests that he was a great king, leader, and person, his choices were not always great. In order for him to be successful, he made many horrible decisions that led to many lives being lost. Because of his actions and all the choices he made, there were a lot of negative repercussions for others. Alexander the Great was not actually great because his choices led to many lives being lost for pointless reasons and for his personal gain.

This suggests that Alexander really wanted to take over more land f he had to cause a battle and risk lives in order do so. Also Alexander wanted to get revenge on

Alexander the great created a long lasting impressing legacy for himself, his warriors, and his great empire. Alexander was born in 356 B.C.E. in Macedonia, just 20 years later he became the King of an empire because of his father's early death (BGE). Alexander conquered many of the world’s greatest empires ever know, and doing so at a very young age! He created one of the strongest most feared empires seen (Docs A & E). So, how great was Alexander the Great? He showed many signs and characteristics of leadership and remarkable achievement throughout his life and his rule in Macedonia. Alexander was great for three big reasons, he created a strong and feared empire, had a long lasting legacy, and he was a smart strategic leader.

One reason that Alexander was not as great as he sounds is because he killed 100,000 people in only 4 major battles. As said in document E, Alexander killed many, many people in order to take over their land. That shows how rude he can be, killing people for what he only really cares about, their land. According to document C, “Alexander ordered that all except those who sought sanctuary (safety in temple) were to be slain.” Document C also stated “Seven thousand Tyrians died… and the number would have been far higher had it

Some people say Alexander the Great was a good leader, others think otherwise. I will show you that Alexander the Great was in fact not a great leader and ruler over his empire. Alexander was a ruthless and brutal leader to put it in the simplest terms. Alexander was a very severe leader for many reasons. Alexander the Great had everything handed to him because his dad was King Philip II. He had conquered many lands and had a well-trained army, and to his detriment Alexander inherited them directly from his dad after he was assassinated. Overall, Alexander the Great was not that Great.