Alexander Hamilton Revised

Alexander Hamilton has taken part in many things , he was killed in a duel because of supporting Jefferson instead of Aaron Burr . He didn’t like the “rough draft “ of the constitution so he redid some parts of it ( i’m not sure what part(s) ) . Hamilton helped with dealing with the money in all of the banks and he also was the first secretary of treasury .

Two rival political parties, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, first transpired in the United States’ government in the eighteenth century – Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson leading each. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were key figures in the development of the United States of America into what the country is today. Each figure leading their political party battled one another for political control. While both public figures left a lasting impact on the nation, Hamilton and Jefferson contrasted one another when interpreting the Constitution, assigning government authority, implementing economic policies, and creating foreign policy.

Why does Hamilton argue that the judicial branch “will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution”? – Hamilton makes this point because he wants to prove that the judicial branch is the weakest of the three branches. This is because they cannot confront the other two branches in any way; they can only make their best judgments on issues that are brought to them. Yet, Hamilton also points out this is a good thing because by being separated from the other two, the judiciary can never pose a threat to liberty.

Over time, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton have been arguing on their views on how to run our nation. Their opposing viewpoints resulted in the emergence of two political parties. One political party was the Federalist, who supported Alexander Hamilton. The second political party was the Democratic-Republicans, who supported Thomas Jefferson. As a member of the cabinet and a fellow American, I would support Alexander Hamilton and the Federalist party. I would support Hamilton because of his view on the economy and foreign policy. To elaborate, I would support the Federalists because of their perspective on the constitution and government. My opponents may say that their views on foreign policy, economy, government, and the constitution

To die a tragic death by the hand of another man- to carve ones way through destiny and shape one's future from the humblest of beginnings- to forge a legacy by a medium only those heralded as our countries "Forefathers" have per chanced to meddle with- these are the makings and the foundations for which great men and the dreams of our country rely upon.

Two men waited. Anxiously they watched as their friends negotiated, watched as the day’s proceedings were determined, watched as they prepared themselves for the worst—turning their back on their armed enemy, walking ten paces, and engaging in a race so critical that losing by a millisecond could mean losing one’s life. Such were the reckless and recognized risks of dueling, and such were the risks for Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr when they met on July 11, 1804, to participate in an illegal pistol duel. Although Hamilton had an overall captivating life, an intriguing theme that can be observed throughout his life is conflict. His childhood, his competition with Thomas Jefferson, and his continual clash with Aaron Burr are three examples

The Articles of Confederation had a weak central government. Alexander Hamilton believed that the more powerful state governments would take over. In Federalist Paper 16, he states that the death of the confederacy would be the result of the lack of a large national defense. Hamilton says the government should have control over the individual as well as the states so that the government can protect the “hopes and fears” of the individuals. Government is important to the unity of its country, and Hamilton claims that no government can always avoid or control those who will be disorderly, but it would be “vain to hope to guard against events too mighty for human foresight or precaution, and it would be idle to object to a government because it

In the beginning, The Articles of Confederation ruined all sense of a strong central government in the Colonies. The Articles of Confederation gave power to the states to govern themselves, and as we later learned, the idea to give power to the states to govern themselves individually was a very weak idea. Most people who didn’t own land, also known as freeloaders, didn’t have much or any say at all in the government. We needed change, and we needed it quickly. This is where, Alexander Hamilton, comes into play. Not only did he understand that a strong central government was crucial for a nation to succeed, but he had also understood that speaking out about his beliefs were just as important. His assertive and outgoing personality about his beliefs consequently helped him play a key role in the early form of the government.

Alexander Hamilton was most likely born on January 11, 1757, although the exact year of his birth is unknown. Hamilton was born on the Caribbean island of Nevis or St. Kitts to Rachel Fawcett and James Hamilton, but he spent the majority of his youth on the island of St. Croix. His formal education as a child was minimal. When his mother died in 1768, Hamilton took his

According to Scott (2008), the Constitution of America has undergone several translations within the history of America because they found it to be unclear. Whereas it appears discrepant that the unclear Constitution could be useful, the disagreement is the case (Robertson, 2005). Americans regard the Constitution to be helpful for the reason that it allows for diverseness of views. In the history of America, a variety of thoughts would develop with alarming and formidable support through various factions (Robertson, 2005). Today, the main political arguments are presented from the Republican group or Democratic group. During the early periods of the American government, arguments on politics were made by Thomas Jefferson

Alexander Hamilton's definiton of the Supreme Court's power of judicial review was argued in Federalist No. 78.

In Federalist Paper number 78, Alexander Hamilton addresses the importance of an independent judicial branch and judicial review. The Constitution proposes the federal judges hold their office for life, Hamilton says by serving for life it decreases the chance of political pressure

Hamilton discusses the powers of the judiciary in the Federalist papers essay no 78. He asserts that the judicial arm of the government is the least likely to threaten liberty and property of the citizens. Part of this assertion was brought about by his conviction and beliefs, that the judiciary was the weakest branch of government. The constitution spells out three branches of government which are independent of each other and perform different roles to the benefit of citizens. This document also spells out the checks and balances that help in regulating the three branches. For the judiciary, however, its nature of the roles makes it weakest. It also means that the role that judiciary plays in ensuring justice is meted upon every individual in the country makes it the least arm of government that can threaten individuals’ political rights.

Federalist No. 78 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton. It was written to analyze and justify the structure of the judiciary under the Constitution of the United States. Hamilton addressed the concerns of Anti-Federalists in regards to the power of the Judiciary. The Anti- Federalist believed the constitution made the judges too independent; implying that “There is no power above them, to control any of their decisions.” However, Hamilton viewed the Judicial Branch in a much inferior and less important role of all branches. Hamilton says, that the Judiciary branch of the proposed government would be the weakest of the three because it had "no influence over either the sword or the purse” This indicates that the Judicial branch has no control of

There are many characteristics that could impact one’s life in a negative way causing them to lose everything in life such as selfishness, messiness, untrustworthiness, self-righteousness, or ego. In the award-winning musical, Hamilton: The Revolution, by Lin-Manuel-Miranda, the character of protagonist, Alexander Hamilton may be described in many ways. However, one character trait stands out among the rest. The main character trait of Alexander Hamilton, self-righteousness, shaped everything about his life: how he grew up, how he dominated in debates, and even how he fell from grace. Hamilton always stuck by his ideals, not caring whether it affected other people. These traits led him to lose and gain