preview

Age Of Reason Dbq Analysis

Decent Essays

Humanism, exploration, and modern ideas of science all contributed to the beginning of the Age of Reason, or the Enlightenment, a time of perfecting society. In the 1600s and 1700s, some monarchs ruled as enlightened despots, which minorly influenced the society. Some philosophers wanted to make bigger chances as they began developing secular views, ultimately seeking democracy. When seeking this goal, they found the many flaws with society and government. As natural laws took shape in the 18th century, it revolutionized government and changed the nature of society.
Natural law, the idea that man is born with certain rights, began to take hold in Europe during the 18th century. Natural law recognizes the rights that man alone has at birth, …show more content…

As a result of the scientific revolution, people continued to question the truths of the government, as natural law grew. Joan Fichte, a German philosopher, repels the types of rulers as they “have no rights at all over our freedom of thought, you princes; no jurisdiction over that which is true or false” (Doc 4). Before the Scientific Revolution, the people believed what the government had told them, without any question. The natural law is now granting these rights to the people which is slowly nullifying the government's control over the people. As a result of the people questioning government, the people made changes to their government leaders way of ruling. Rulers used to be omnipotent in their rule, but the natural law constricts the rulers. English philosopher, John Locke, provides his views on rulers. If the rulers work in an unjust manner than the people should use ¨forces . . . nothing but . . . unjust and unlawful force; whoever makes any opposition in any other case draws on himself a just condemnation both from God and man” (Doc 2). If a ruler is abusing his power, the people can stand up to him in a way that is not morally correct. Knowing that the people can oppose the government leaders, the leaders have to be more judicious in their decisions and consistently lead in a moral manner. Not only do the people have strong disapproval but God is …show more content…

Natural law brought unity to society as it conformed the people’s rights. The main document of the French Revolution, The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, discusses the rights of the members of society. One right of the society members is that they “are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good” (Doc 5). The only reason man might not be treated fair is because of what the man brought upon himself. He is not born unequal in rights but instead abused the innate rights. Natural law is fair to society because everybody is given the same rights, which essentially unified society. Being born free is only part of natural liberty but these citizens were also granted many other types of liberty as well. With the natural law, each citizen was granted all liberty, not just some components of it. Abbé Raynal also discusses what rights each member of society is given. To begin his discussion he defines liberty as “the property of one’s self. Three kinds of it are distinguished. Natural liberty, civil liberty, and political liberty . . . Natural liberty is the right granted by nature to every man to live freely. Civil liberty is the right which is insured by society to every citizen, of doing everything which is not contrary to the laws. Political liberty is the state of a people who have not given up

Get Access