For many years schools have debated on whether they should or should not have after school sports programs. According to people in the US, school sports are a distraction for students. Therefore, schools should eliminate sports to cut costs, gain more time for the students to rest, and allow them to advance in their academic work.
Body paragraph #1 If expensive school sports were to be eliminated, districts could save thousands of dollars to create a more educational environment for their students. As stated in an article by Amanda Ripley, schools spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to maintain the quality of their sports fields and equipment (11). In addition, they spend about half a million on new bleachers, about 20 thousand dollars
I believe we should get rid of after school sports, because schools are going over budgets, and kids are getting distracted from school. Yes many people believe we should keep sports because they help students relieve stress and help students relax; but they have caused schools to go over budget and scholars grades have dropped.Therefore, schools should get rid of after school sports because districts cannot afford them, kids are getting distracted, and scholars grades will improve.
The impact of preserving sports in high schools has been surrounded by much controversy as people suspect that it is the reason behind the poor academic achievement of students. Opponents to high school sports feel that allowing athletics to be a part of schools sidetracks the focus of the student body, which goes completely against the main purpose of schools. Indeed, this assertion is completely true and based upon plentiful evidence. High school sports undoubtedly come at the expense of student academic achievement since they divert the attention of students away from academics and they come with far too many financial costs, both of which incur negative impacts on the academics within a school. The bottomline is that sports are harming the education of students, so a school must make the decision between composing quality sports teams or providing high level academics; both of these choices simply cannot occur simultaneously.
At the end of a long, stressful day at school, you look out to the field where you will soon be with your friends, enjoying the sun on your skin and working off the stress of your cooped up day at school, with your favorite sport, of course. The article “Should Your School Get Rid of School Sports?” has two very strong point of views. Part one, “Yes! It’s Time to Scale Back” by Amanda Ripley argues that we should get rid of school sports. However, part two, “No! Sports Are More Important Than Ever” by Tim O’Shei argues that we should keep school sports. School sports can be expensive, but there are many more benefits and reasons for having sports at school than getting rid of them.
Today, majority of kids mainly focus on doing their absolute best academically, and they also enjoy after school sports. Though some students are doing great in school; many do not have the time to do homework because of these activities. Therefore, schools should get rid of extra curricular sports because they will save money, it boosts testing scores, and it allows students’ to focus on work.
Districts around the country have sports for students to compete against schools within their own communities; however, some people think that is a problem. It is common for athletes to spend more time on sports than they do on their school work, and this is causing their grades to drop. Therefore, schools should end sports to give students extra time to do homework, include more time for educational activities, and cut the districts expensive budgets.
Which is more important, sports or education? In America, sports seem to be the winner. Athletes get paid about 53 million dollars a year, compared to the 58,170 dollars teachers get paid. Another way sports wins is that sports are now a huge part of school, but should they? Schools shouldn’t be in school because academic impact, financial impact, and family impact.
After school sports might be fun, but it is not helping the students at all. The games themselves might reduce stress levels; but it has been shown that schools tend to spend more on the fields and the bleachers then should actually be spent. A school was almost shut down because of the academic failures, but somehow still had equipment to play games. Therefore, schools should get rid of after school sports because they spend too much money on them, America is lacking academily compared to other countries, and they pay too much attention to the games.
A large amount of schools physical activities are provoking economic complications. According to an article by Amanda Ripley, “New bleachers would cost half a million dollars” (11). A school in Premont, Texas cut off their science lab which was infested in mold; yet, maintained their their after school sports (Ripley, 11). This supports the idea that schools are spending an excessive amount of money on their physical education that should be spent for educational purposes. This evidence proves that districts are spending truckloads of money on their after school physical education.
Many schools are now starting to debate whether to have after school sports.A variety of students and parents may not condone with the idea. Therefore, schools should not have after school activities because, students focus more on, sports then their school work, they take money away from the school when they could use it for better purposes, last, it takes too much time consuming .
School sports are very controversial and one of the main reasons is lack of funding. According to an article by Amanda Ripley, Premont Independent School District in Texas was on the verge of closing down because of financial shortages, but when they cut sports from the budget, they saved 150 thousand dollars (11). Ripley continues by saying if a school wants to improve items like bleachers,
As you can tell, without sports, crucial elements are missing within student's lives. Sports contribute to the ability of socialization among kids, encouragement on academic performance, and achieving goals. These pieces would be affected greatly if sports were eliminated from schools. Lasting friendships from team sports, otherwise misplaced academic encouragement, and goal skills would be lost. Keep school sports. Save kids the
School sports are a fun and interesting experience for adults and children, but when they set up these activities it takes money away from the district. According to superintendent Ernest singleton made a “bold decision” by getting rid of all the school sports at his school, doing this made a significant impact in their funds after taking away sports, they saved a total of $150,000 in one year (11).
When schools cut sports from their schedule, districts would agree that they have saved money after eliminating them. Amanda Ripley states in the article, “Should Your School Get Rid of School Sports?” that new bleachers can cost half a million dollars and maintaining a grass field can cost more than $20,000 a year (11). The article also talks about schools having to pay for transportation, meals, and hotels for long trips to games and tournaments (Ripley 11). If you add all the numbers, physical activities can cost up to $570,000 a year, including extra money spent for hospitality for long distance games, that’s a tremendous amount of money! This shows that schools are paying an immense amount for athletic programs.
Districts have been wasting money on after school sports that should be applied towards academics. According to Amanda Ripley’s article in Scholastic Scope, she states, “New bleachers can cost half a million dollars”(11).Not to mention, trying to maintain a grass field could be very expensive, costing more than $20,000 a year.(Ripley, 11).This data shows that districts are spending a large
For many years now sports have been a major part of high schools. They bring the community together and help bring out the school spirit in not only the students, but everyone who comes out to watch the games. As fun as it sounds, the funding of sports can be quite expensive and yet there are schools that will do anything to keep them going. That is an issue that many people worry about because there are schools that need the funding for more important educational programs. In “The Case Against High-School Sports” by Amanda Ripley, she states that the money and time that goes into high school sports should be reconsidered. Personally, I agree with her statement but to a certain extent in the sense that I also believe that sports have the capability of helping some students to be more engaged in their studies or at least care more about them.