Affordable Care Act Socialism

Long before the 1990s when Ms. Clinton fought for a Universal Healthcare system in America, the issue of America’s healthcare had been a political quandary. The enactment of the Republican administration’s Health Management Organization Act of 1973 was a weapon meant to address that crisis, yet, it did little to fix the problem. While the liberal Democrats are fighting for Universal Healthcare coverage for all Americans, the conservative Republicans are fighting to maintain the current private health insurance, however, with some revamping of the system, which preserves the capitalistic element of the status quo. The reason for the two opposing views stems from their differences in political ideologies, which theoretically is like pitting socialism against capitalism. While the liberal Democrats’ endorsement of Universal Healthcare system is socialistic in practice, the conservative Republicans’ fight to retain the private or market based plan is unarguably in support of their pro-capitalism stance. The truth, however, is that, though almost every American believes in capitalism, yet, almost none would vote to disband the Medicare and the Medicaid programs, both of which are socialistic. In that light, the argument of a pro-capitalist nation is negated, as we do already have a socialized healthcare program for the seniors and the poor. Extending that concept to include

Quality health care is an issue in America for everyone, despite our numerous tests and advances in technology. In his article, “Overkill,” Atul Gawande argues against a common assumption that our healthcare system is the best because of these medical advances. In fact, Gawande claims that our health care provides much unnecessary care that often causes harm and that costs a lot . He follows that claim by redefining “low-value care” as “no-value care” and provides considerable scientific data along with his own experience with his own patients to support his claim. He also states logical reasons by referring to expert authorities who critique our health care by viewing it from an economic perspective: like talking about information asymmetry where a doctor is more informed than the patient, thus the doctor has more power over the patient. All of these emphases strongly defend his controversial claim. But what stands out most is how Gawande uses several stories showing vastly different outcomes, depending on how informed the patient and doctor are including offering non invasive treatments. We need to explore how his unusual storytelling strategy exposes how surgeons and patients should care more about quality than the mere quantity of tests and what alternatives are available to change the unnecessary over testing and over-diagnosis which prevent good health care.

Obamacare, also known as the Affordable Care Act, is an attempt by the Obama administration to provide affordable healthcare to all Americans. The act attempts to accomplish this feat by standardizing healthcare and making specific groups of Americans pay more for universal healthcare plans while other groups, mainly the unfortunate, are made to pay less. The system is designed to have wealthier Americans give more money to the national government, which in turn would lower the cost of healthcare for the unfortunate (Obamacare Facts). The problem with this system is that as the wealthy class loses money and the lower class gains money, eventually the classes will become equal. Obamacare could possibly turn America’s democratic society into a socialistic society.

The Affordable Care Act was constructed by President Obama to help transform the health care system. The Affordable Care Act is supposed to implement a system that would reduce the health care costs. This would also improve the efficiency of procedures by eliminating the denial of coverage due to pre-existing conditions. Unfortunately, over 44 Million Americans can’t afford the cost of medical insurance, but the law grants these Americans medical insurance benefits. Before this law was in place, insurance companies could deny patients the medical attention they needed, drop their medical coverage halfway through their treatment, and have a maximum payment they prepared to pay.

Fifty years ago if the reception on the television went bad, first you knocked on the side, then peered in back for bad vacuum tubes and finally tinkered with loose connections. Today we unplug and restart.

Affordable Care Act also known as Obamacare, is a new reform that was signed by President Obama in March 2010 and major provisions went into effect in January 1st, 2014. Obama’s goal with the ACA was that “the core principle that everybody should have some basic security when it comes to their healthcare.” The ACA’s goal is to extend insurance to more than 30 million American people, by expanding Medicaid and providing federal subsidies to help lower- and middle-income buy private coverages. Another reform that is similar to the ACA is a Single Payer System that is trying to be pushed to fix the problems of the ACA such as eliminating commercial insurance.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) or know as Obamacare has given our country confusing matters to consider. The argument of misleading the facts in dealing with the ACA have caused an uproar with the American people. Before ACA was even composed we were misled in thinking that the uninsured, instead of health concerns, is the cause of the American people decrease of life expectation. Now that the ACA is in place, people are told they will be fine if uninsured, when in truth they will be taxed. The harshest misleading fact is that gaps in the Affordable Care Act make insurance not affordable to all citizens. We are being led to believe that a single player for health care is not socialized medicine. I believe that things needed to change with our health care and its cost, but misleading the people just causes more confusing, disappointments, and suspicions of what may follow.

In 2010, congress enacted President Obama’s National Health Care Act; as a result, it allows Americans to receive affordable health care. President Obama’s National Healthcare plan, otherwise known as the Affordable Care Act, is anything but affordable. The Affordable Care Act is not affordable for citizens that are in the nation’s lower income brackets. The Affordable Care Act is a great government conscious decision for their citizens; however, the Affordable Care Act at the time of its inception was very fiscally irresponsible by our government. The Affordable Care Act must be affordable for Americans across multiple social and economic backgrounds and should take into account the ability to pay.

The Affordable Care Act is President Obama’s new solution to provide healthcare coverage to uninsured Americans. The theory is that millions of uninsured Americans will get access to affordable health insurance through the government. The Affordable Care Act reforms Medicare. You cannot be dropped from coverage when you get sick. You cannot be denied coverage or treatment for being sick. You also cannot be charged more for being sick. Although these are all mostly the positive sides to the Affordable Care Act there are many negative. Since you cannot be dropped for being sick, it will make the prices for everyone’s insurance go up. Also, since so few young and healthy Americans have signed up, the math used to create the program is not adding up. Because there is so much confusion surrounding the specifics of the ACA, the Affordable Care Act keeps getting delayed. The Obama administration announced another delay on

Dr. Atul Gawande wrote a piece for the New Yorker titled “Now What.” It was published just one short month after President Obama signed into law the Affordable Care Act (ACA), and it addresses a few points of consideration surrounding the controversial law, points that have since compounded into intense debates. For anyone who has glanced at a newspaper or navigated the internet between then and now, it’s impossible to miss; the tension created from the passing of the ACA is palpable. Four years later, the ACA remains a hot topic, especially in political circles.

“If Obamacare is so wonderful, why is it that its loudest advocates don 't want to be subject to it,” stated Senator Ted Cruz. As financial and social hardships began to become apparent in the United States, one major problem facing the citizens and governing body is Health Care for all. Socialized medicine is a health care system where the government funds and runs health care facilities and employs the health care professionals, also paying for all health care amenities. This idea of giving high quality care to citizens previously unable to afford healthcare has caused problems in the United States, and this idea of “socialized medicine” has proven to create hardships in other countries in the past. Obamacare has introduced socialized medicine in the United States which has caused negative effects both financially and ethically.

Social problems exist all around us, one that seems to be quite prevalent right now is the Affordable Care Act is also known as ACA or more commonly known as Obama Care, which is a derogatory term meant to lessen or negate the President who founded it. There are many issues with this particular act that it’s difficult to pinpoint just one. However, I feel as though the utmost obvious is the negative shadow that is cast upon the Affordable Care Act, this is the real problem. The greatest common insurance that is utilized through this plan is Medicaid, which is insurance that is issued by the state that you live in, and is determined by income (CMS.gov, 2013). The main objective of this policy is to provide medical care for the

What is Affordable Care Act? It is a federal statue, which is a bill passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama in 2010 (Fordney, 2017). Quality care, positive outcomes and access to affordable health care insurance has been an issue on the priority list of government officials. With this healthcare change the objective is to enhance access to care and expand insurance coverage for all Americans. The law incorporates expansions to be established, including the improvement of Medicaid eligibility. Also, the development of medical coverage exchanges, which will give buyers security and flexibility of healthcare coverage. To diminish cost to buyer’s new models for payments was established, thus improving the way care is

First and Foremost , the Affordable Care Act also know as Obama Care was created so our citizens in the United States can all have affordable insurance for the people of this country. The Obama Care is very similar to Canada’s healthcare system. For example , the healthcare system in Canada system is a group of socialized health insurance plans that provides coverage to all Canadian citizens. It is publicly funded and administered on a provincial or territorial basis, within guidelines set by the federal government ( Canadian Health Care n.d. 2016 ). The United States wanted a similar health care system to make sure the americans who don’t have insurances have the ability to be insured .

Has the time come to consider socialized health care or some hybrid, why or why not. To help answer this question, we need understand what the definition of “socialized health care” means. According to definition found in Wikipedia (2016), “medical and hospital care for all at a nominal cost by means of government regulation of health care and subsidies derived from taxation.” The phrase “care for all at a nominal cost” sound like a goal that everybody wants, but when you add the phrase “by means of government regulation” after it, now the whole definition changes. The notion that government need to intervene to provide health care cost to all automatically instill in our psyche that our “freedom” is restricted to some degree. It says