Advantages and Disadvantages of The Civil War During the American Civil War, the Union was successful because of their numerous factories, population, and transportation. The Confederate was unsuccessful because of their economic failures. They started out strong and failed during the war during The Civil War. They could really only make cotton. The Union came up with a plan called the Anaconda Plan to shut down the Confederate economically and it worked. This plan was an idea to make the Confederate crumble economically. They used their navy to surround there harbors and the Mississippi to stop any imports or exports to the Confederate. The Union had more factories than the Confederate allowing them to be able to produce goods way faster. This also allowed them to make guns, clothing, and railroads. The union had more people fighting in the war giving them more troops to fight in battles, and all of the troops had supplies thanks to their numerous factories. The Unionerners had better transportation than the Confederate giving them the ability to travel through the country faster. This also allowed them to transport goods faster. The Union and the Confederate both had their strengths and weaknesses but at the end of the war the Union showed that they were stronger than the Confederate. The union had factories spread out over the Union. These factories produced goods for the troops. These factories were faster than making supplies by hand giving them an advantage over the
The lack of emphasis on manufacturing and commercial interest, stemming from the Southern desire to preserve their traditional agricultural society, disadvantaging themselves to the North and their ability to function independently. It was neither Northern troops nor generals that won the Civil War, rather Northern guns and industry. Northern states produced 97% of firearms in the US which allowed war materials to be much more accessible and productive to produce as the North already had these large factory’s, which is
One of the reasons the South lost to the Union was due to the manpower
The North began the war more prepared and better equipped than the South as their factories began to pour out brand new rifles and munitions at an impressive rate.
However this effected the South because they failed to grow their industrial platform. The North had 66% of railroad mileage when the South had only 34%. This shows by far that the North was more industrialized than the South. Since the Union had more mileage of railroad they were able to have their men, food, and materials transported for a long distance in a short period of time. Unlike the North the South was unfortunate to not have such an advanced railroad. The South was able to transport some distance but not nearly the amount of mileage the North could cover. This shows very clearly the South simply lost the war due to their lack of interest in improving their resource industry and industrial
At first, it looked as though the Union had all the advantages and this would be a short war. First, the Union had the large population, people to fight in the war and work in the factories to make war materials. The North also had the industrial base, the factories to make these war materials. The Union also was wealthier than the Confederacy and could finance the war. The Union had an established army and government, but the Confederacy would have to build their army and government from scratch. Finally, the Union had a navy which they used to blockade the southern coast. But the Confederacy had advantages, too. The Confederacy would be fighting a defensive war, which is much easier than having to invade and conquer a territory, something
The population that the North had was much larger than the South and this gave them advantages and led to victory
The North was also able to create a blockade towards the South which prevented the South from accessing ships or any way that they had to transport goods. Stated in an article called “Why did the Union Win/ Confederacy Lose?” by Carl Zebrowski states, “But of course the factors that enter into the South’s ultimate defeat are those things that you hear time and time again, and with a great amount of validity: the North’s industrial base; the North’s manpower resources; the fact that foreign recognition was denied the Confederacy” (Zebrowski 3). The bottom line as to why the Union had won was clear and it as because of their ability to cope with the situation in a way that would be realistic and they had more than enough people going to war compared to the South. The North had weapons and men that were able to fight the war with easy access to weapons, the South had weapons but not enough men to fight for them during the war. It was evident that the South lacked people because in article it is mentioned that the manpower between the North and South was conflicting in a large amount.
Historian McPherson argues that “Norther superiority in numbers and resources was a necessary condition for Union victory”. This shows that the North had a major advantage through their larger population, which helped them win the Civil War. The North also had a better industry. In 1860, the North had 6 times as many factories as the South, 10 times the industrial productive capacity and twice as many miles of railway. This proves that the North had an industrial advantage as everything would run normally during the war and supplies would still be produced at high rates.
The Union had a bigger army as there were 12 million more people in population. They also had the majority of factories and money, which was essential in a war. The government supported the union as well. A bigger navy also proved to be useful during the war.
Supplies was another factor that lead to the Unions victory over the Confederacy. The North had many factories that produced goods and supplies which were needed to keep the Union in the battle. The South had inadequate amounts of supplies because the focused more on farming and less on the production of goods. The goods that the North had that helped them during the war was guns and ammunition, blankets, dog tents, utensils, tin plates and cups, and canteens. Guns and ammunition played a large role in the Unions victory.
The Civil War was a very gruesome war. The war had become the Union (North) and the Confederacy (South). During the war the union and confederacy had many weaknesses and strengths. Some of them are technology, army/military and government.
An army of soldiers requires an enormous amount of supplies, so one would therefore need to have the means to thereby create those supplies. The North was well industrialized by the time of the Civil War, whereas the South was still highly dependent on slave labor, which hindered their ability to industrialize.4 When it came to producing weapons, uniforms, shoes, preserved food, tools for more effective farming to feed soldiers, the telegraph, and other necessities, the Union was way in the lead. They could not only create these products, but they could produce them in mass amounts in a fraction of the time it originally took to make them.5 The South had a hard time enduring the war because they did not have the factories necessary to produce the quality and mass amount of supplies they needed.
The Union had 22 million soldiers. The amount of casualties was 360,000. The Union was bigger than the Confederacy they had better artilleries than Confederacy. They had more immigrants and have more good junior and mid-level officers. Advantages were, banking, ships, factories, experienced government, more railroads to transport supplies, equipment and men, larger navy, larger population.
The civil war, fought from 1861-1865, was started after seven southern slave states declared their secession and formed the Confederate states. The Union had many advantages that, ultimately, led them to victory. The had many political, economic, and military benefits that aided them in their victory.
As a result, the North was seen as the advantage and the South with the disadvantage due to the amount populations and resources. The author George M. Fredrickson explains his reasoning behind why he believes the north had a greater advantage. In the Why the North Won by James McPherson also explains the advantages of the north, he then after states turning points during the war which affected the end result. Both of the secondary sources state economic, population and resources which were all in favor of the Unions