preview

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Narrative Criticism

Decent Essays

In biblical study, Narrative Criticism has been developed against the evolutionary models of historical criticism, which has been mainly focused to reenact the position and thought of the original writer and audience through certain ‘scientific and analysis of biblical material’. This discipline is the study of a narrative text most likely similar to any narrative literature. It is sub discipline of interpretation method under literary criticism, which emphases on ‘the literary form or shape of the text in its final form’ as pointer of what the texts meant. There is general agreement among the various disciplines of literary approach, that they all consider Scripture as a ‘literary document’, rather than a ‘historical’. These various disciplines, …show more content…

Therefore, when someone engaged in narrative criticism approach, he needs to pay attention the text only. Text is mirror here, not window as historical criticism usually does. Again, it opens the readers up to new insights in the text that we may not have seen before, or that we may have unnoticed.
B. weakness
One of the potential weaknesses for Narrative criticism is a little concern for authorial intention. It is clear that, someone who engaged in narrative criticism approach and cannot emphasize the plot, the character, and lose the historical background or the historical reference of the text. In addition, in narrative criticism approach there is a high tendency to look scripture as any other literature and fiction, because they used a methodology of the same kind.
In general, with careful managing of those negative sides mentioned in the above, narrative criticism is a better and significant approach that does result in a renewed focus on the text, and this focus maintains a deliberate and well-built grasp on historical issues, it may have its

Get Access