Chapter Three: week three
Caught in Adultery
Scripture of the Week: John 7:53-8:11
53Then each of them went home, 8 1 while Jesus went to the Mount of Olives. 2 Early in the morning he came again to the temple. All the people came to him and he sat down and began to teach them. 3 The scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman who had been caught in adultery; and making her stand before all of them, 4 they said to him, “Teacher, this woman was caught in the very act of committing adultery. 5 Now in the law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?” 6 They said this to test him, so that they might have some charge to bring against him. Jesus bent down and wrote with his finger on the ground. 7 When they kept on questioning
…show more content…
However, it is currently in most Bibles so you should have no problem finding it. The issue that we will be working with is the idea of stoning the woman for adultery. In most places in the world stoning is now illegal however, people still get killed over things such as adultery. Saying that it is part of the law to kill someone who harms another. However, in the places that kill because of adultery they typically only kill the woman while the man gets off the hook. So those will be the issues that will be …show more content…
When everyone has set down ask them, “How has your week been different knowing the information that we have learned over the past two weeks?” (If it has not been different that is ok). After the question has been fully answered you can then move on to the next step. Open with prayer.
Scripture Reading: Tell all of the youth to open their Bibles to John 7:53. Ask for a volunteer to read the scripture aloud to the rest of the group. Once the scripture has been read ask, “What do you think the purpose of this scripture is?” When fully answered move on to ask, “How could this relate to our verse from last week?” After you feel like the question has been fully answered you can move on to the next section.
Scripture Lesson: for the lesson say something similar to, “In this passage we have the lawmakers bring a woman who they are saying has commited adultery and asking Jesus to condemn her. Yet every other time they do this they are trying to trap Jesus in Jesus’s words, so why would this time be any different?” Next ask, “Do you think the woman actually committed adultery so was she just blamed?” when the question has been answered to its fullest ask, “If she was guilty then why was she the only one being tried and not the man?” Once this question has been answered fully ask, “were else do you feel like men have better treatment then men?” After the question has been answered you can move
“And we are not going to say one more word about murder” (D’Amato). Angered by his children’s interest in the murder that took place in the Motel 66, Donald states that further inquiries into the matter will not be tolerated. Completely stonewalling the matter hides Donald’s fear of the truth: his wedding night and the morbid turns that followed. Barbara D’Amato’s short story “Motel 66” features a motel that the main characters return to over a period of twenty-seven years. This motel serves as a breeding ground for a succession of lies meant to conceal the adultery and murder that happened on one eventful night. As the plot unfolds, D’Amato masterfully hints at the conclusion while abstaining from providing the reader with the final,
“If there is a man who commits adultery with another man’s wife, one who commits adultery with his friend’s wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death” (Lockman). Love can change a person and sometimes not for the best. On the 25th of November, 1869, Daniel McFarland, with an unstable mind caused by the infidelity of his wife, Abby Sage McFarland, shot Albert D. Richardson at the Tribune office in New York. Daniel McFarland is not guilty of murder, and justly so. He is only guilty of defending his own honor and family. He was betrayed by the one he loved the most, and was wrongfully torn away from his children.
How could Jesus disobey a commandment which is clearly written. There is no way this women should be able to get out of this punishment. This women should have got stoned to death right then and there. But could it be possible this was a trap? Those men were not trying to seek justice.
Aisha was traveling with her husband Muhammad and some of his followers. Aisha claimed that she had left camp in the morning to search for her lost necklace, but when she returned, she found that the company had broken camp and left without her. She waited for half a day, until she was rescued by a man named Safwan ibn Al-Muattal and taken to rejoin the caravan. This led to speculation that she had committed adultery with Safwan. Muhammad's adopted son Zayd ibn Harithah defended Aisha's reputation. Shortly after this, Muhammad announced that he had received a revelation confirming Aisha's innocence and directing that charges of adultery be supported by four eyewitnesses. These verses also rebuked Aisha's accusers,whom
How does one react to the act of adultery? In the novel, The Scarlet Letter, written by Nathaniel Hawthorne, the reaction to such a crime is inevitable. The symbol A, stamped onto the main character, Hester’s chest is the punishment for this act of infidelity; which therefore divulges the true psychological nature of the characters in the novel. With the birth of Hester’s daughter Pearl, reveals the birth of psychological natures and actions of several characters. Throughout the novel, the repressions, consciousnesses, and actions towards Hester, is manifested throughout the characters, as it reveals that their psychological attributes truly stem from their pious philosophies.
Spiritual adultery occurs when a Christian falls in love with things of the world. I remembered when I was in a courtship with my wife; we deliberated on how to sustain a lifetime partnership.
Adultery is one of the ten commandments written by God and delivered to the people by Moses, a man. Mankind had lived a life based on the ten commandments for centuries. To literally question and process the reasoning behind each commandment that was given, it can be argued that they were written more for a society dominated by males rather than for a society of both sexes. It was men who started and fought the wars. That is not to say it was unheard of for a woman to cheat, steal or kill, but going by the "biblical ways of life," men have long had the need to have what other men possessed and a need to dominate and control.
In “marriage private affair” Nnaemeka comes out as a respectable man who would listen to his father's approval and obey with what he say’s. But when it comes to Nnaemeka personal life he will not obey his father. I think one of his personalities is he wears his heart on his sleeve. He gives everyone the benefit of the doubt with their opinion and morals on what he should do. Nnaemeka father is a very moral man and wants to basically have control over his son's life. His father started to overcome the fact because he didn't wanna die without knowing his grandkids. Nnaemeka and his wife was somewhat consistent with sending letters to his father even though he didn't wanna talk to them again. John's father in “meeting in the dark” seems like a
That Nathaniel Hawthorne to chose such a controversial topic as adultery for The Scarlet Letter, his nineteenth century novel of "seventeenth century sexual repression and hypocrisy" (Zabarenko PG), demonstrates a delicate yet changing climate with regard to infidelity.
Some Politian also said about the homosexuality are violates the rules of ethics and the natures. Of course, in our city, the polygamy marriages under the law, it cannot be broke by homosexuality. Hang on, can you tell me there are how many women or men cheat? Some of them did break the adultery law too. So I just wondering, is homosexuality break the relationship of partners up, or their desire break their relationship up? For the natures
likely somewhere around 80 A.D. John’s writings, then, are the reminiscences of an elderly man looking back on his time with the Messiah; the views presented in
Bonnie Steinbock in her essay “What’s Wrong with Adultery?” starts by quoting the data from studies to show that the number of women who have committed adultery has significantly increased. Despite this increase in female adultery, it is in some degree due to the attitudes changing toward sex and sexuality, but Steinbock thinks that people should use rational justification to evaluate the disapproval of adultery. Then in the rest of the parts of Steinbock’s essay, she is generally arguing against adultery based on the plausible claim that our views toward adultery are varied, and these views are bound to be connected to important conventions about marriage, fidelity, romantic love ( Romeo and Juliet’s case ), the
Now adultery is something I simply cannot abide by in this situation I do feel that what Eric did was wrong and that Joanne did take an acceptable approach. She committed her all to this man and he threw it away without even trying to communicate to her about it first. Maybe trying to see a marriage counselor could have mitigated the situation however no matter what it would never be the same. Eric threw that marriage out the window the moment he decided to have an affair with another women and that is simply something he should have to live with for the rest of his life. As for if he should have told her I suppose he could have had his affair and moved on without ever saying anything but that level of guilt would never go away and it is also
People use many descriptive words or phrases in an attempt to avoid the term adultery; unfaithfulness, infidelity, playing the field, extramarital relations, and having an affair are just a few. Regardless of how the act is labeled, the net result ends in the destruction of reputation, trust, and respect. Ancient cultures understood adultery to be dangerous, even the writers of the Bible granted the act its own “Thou Shalt Not.” Many societies, including the U.S., have outlawed adultery; in some cultures the penalty for this crime is death by stoning. That being said how is it allowable for adultery to be romanticized on many television shows, movies and novels? Is this a heinous crime, a mortal sin, or not? Adultery is the seductive
Adultery is when one person has sexual relations or intimacy with persons other than their spouse or current partner, also known as cheating. In this paper, I argue that adultery is morally impermissible in any circumstance. The film The Other Women accurately depicts adultery as a morally impermissible option. Adultery is an ethical issue that some may seem as permissible under certain circumstances, such as one’s spouse not being around or not being satisfied in the current relationship. However, adultery is morally impermissible because it violates the trust between the two in the committed relationship, it causes emotional and may cause physical harm, and it can impact the life of the family and other relationships involved.