Problem: In the United States, New York State is one of two states that automatically prosecutes 16-year-old adolescents as adults. If arrested as an adolescent, New York State detains 16-year-olds in jail with adults while awaiting trial (Governor.ny.gov, 2015). In New York City, incarcerated adolescents reside on Rikers Island with adult criminals. This injustice compromises youthful offender’s safety and mental health. New York State must change the legislation to raise the age of criminal responsibility. Prosecuting and sentencing adolescents like adults must end.
Issue: The current legislation in place is a 200-year-old law. A 16-year-old can’t vote or buy cigarettes so why should they have adult privileges in the criminal
…show more content…
Claim: Yes, Adolescents must follow the law. If an adolescent commits a crime then they are subject to the penalties that applies within the law. No, New York State’s criminal justice system must be smarter and treat adults and adolescents differently. The criminal justice system must create rehabilitation programs, services and alternative options for adolescent offenders. Young offenders are 34% more likely to be re-arrested for violent crimes (Raise the age.com, n.d.). Adolescents in adult jails are subject to physical assaults, sexual assaults, and suicides. Incarcerated youths in adult prisons are more likely to suffer emotional abuse and psychological damage (Raise the age.com, n.d). Annually more than $100 million dollars is spent to house youths in detentions and jails (Governor.ny.gov). The best option for New York State is to raise the age of criminal …show more content…
Helping adolescents will circumvent the astronomical amount of money made by prison systems. Change is enviable, but many people want to keep things the same. Jails are making money because inmates work for pennies on the dollar. Most prisons support and employ the whole town or city. Lawmakers and prison owners want to continue to reap the revenue benefits. Progressive laws make better living conditions. Challenges from prison owners and lawmakers will make it harder to protect adolescents from being charged like
I am a concerned citizen of New York State and also a developmental psychologist specializing in stages of development in adolescents. I am writing to you because I was just made aware that, in NYS, adolescents still could receive the death penalty as a result of them committing a heinous crime. I believe during this particular stage of development, an adolescent is not fully capable of understanding the magnitude and seriousness of such an act. Psychosocial maturity is reached around the age of 24 that is when adolescents enter adulthood. Reaching cognitive maturity around the age of 16 does not assure maturation because the two structures develop at different rates and serve two different purposes, thus you need both
There are times juveniles should not be convicted as adults because sometimes the “crimes” may not harsh enough to be charged as an adult. For example, if a 8 year old saw a gun in their mother's purse and thought it was a toy and grabbed it and began to shoot who would be at fault ? Plus children in adult prisons are 10 times more likely to be taken advantage of in their time. Research shows that children prosecuted in the adult criminal justice system are more likely to reoffend than those held in the juvenile justice
The New York State Legislators did the right thing and increased the age of criminal responsibility to eighteen-years-old. New York State will not automatically prosecute sixteen and seventeen-year-olds as adults anymore. Annually, nearly 28,000 sixteen and seventeen-year-olds face the possibility of criminal prosecution as an adult (Raise the age.com, n.d.). Now Adolescents don’t have to worry about adult prosecution in the criminal system. Sixteen and Seventeen-year-olds will have the opportunity to call their parents if they get arrested. Sixteen and
Whether or not we should try juveniles as adults has always been a controversial issue. First of all, “juveniles” are children who fall under the age of 18. However, the legal age varies within certain states across the USA. Despite the age difference, some juveniles are still tried as adults. Does convicting a juvenile as an adult, turn out to be a better problem-solver, and how is this affecting the deterrence of crime?
How would you feel if the police arrested kids all over our country to jail for just crossing the street the wrong way or pushing another kid on the playground? That is what is happening to many underage juvenile all over the United States; they are being sent to adult prisons for crimes that do not deserve such severe punishments. Why they were tried as adults is an enigma and we will explain why this is a terrible injustice. In 1899 children in between the ages of 7-14 were believed they were incapable of committing criminal intent. The court system back then believed that if enough evidence could be gathered to convince a jury, the underage person would be convicted and sent to an adult prison. Currently in our state, persons as
If a juvenile, over fourteen has the ability and willingness to commit a violent crime they should be tried and punished as an adult. A fourteen year old knows right from wrong. He (or she) is able to tell whether they are committing a crime. If a juvenile is mature enough to commit an adult crime, they should be treated as an adult, and punished justly according to the adult law. The difference in age in two people should not determine their punishment if they have committed the same crime under the same or similar pretenses.
Teens should be spent to adult jail for the crime they committed! In the late 1980s juveniles have been committing crimes during the period of this time, many of them were getting in trouble more often, crimes were getting more violent by this time. On June 25, 2012 The Supreme Court justices who agrued to abolish mandatory sentences to life in prison for juveniles who commit murder or any crimes reflecting the will of Americans society should be punished as an adult . Justice Alito noted that , “Even a 17 ½ -year-old who set off a bomb in a crowded mall or guns down a dozen students and teacher is ‘child’ and must be given a chance to persuade a judge to permit his release into society…” In other words I agree that teens should be sentenced to life in prison, if I did the same crime I should be punished the same way as an adult who has committed the same crime because during this age I know what I am doing wrong and right. I believe that teen should be sentenced to life in prison because the victim's family reactions, rehabilitation, they should understand the consequences of their actions, mental health issues, and heinous crimes.
The United States leads the world in the incarceration of young people, there are over 100,000 youth placed in jail each year. Locking up youth has shown very little positive impact on reducing crime. Incarcerating youth have posed greater problems such as expenses, limited education, lack of employment, and effect on juveniles’ mental and physical well-being.
A few responses consider that jail should be an option for teenagers. “Some juveniles commit crimes so horrific in their depravity that justice could not be carried out in the juvenile system.” (Charles D.Stimson, 2015) Charles believes that there are many situations where teenagers can go through the juvenile system, but if they do something really bad, they should be punished just like an adult. He uses a convincing example of a 16 year old girl, who plotted and executed a plan to kill her parents. He described that if a teenager can do an adult crime, they should be able to handle the consequences that adults have too. He presented his argument well with supporting facts. “Consequences are good, especially for early crimes. That's when punishment can help young people change and grow.”(Jennifer Bishop-Jenkins, 2015) In Jennifer’s argument, she uses a personal experience which made her feel this way. Jennifer’s pregnant sister, and her husband were murdered by a 16 year old. She makes some strong points as to why she feel that juveniles should be treated as adults. She uses pathos to appeal to the reader, and tries to produce an emotional insight. All arguments feel that this punishment should occur only in major criminal offenses. This side of the argument was well presented because of the facts, and experiences, and was thought to help society, but it did not mention the affect that this would have on the minor. Adding this point would make it more convincing, but the argument was gone about
I do not think it is a good idea to lock juveniles up in prisons with adults. For a child to set down and plan a murder for instance, there would have to be some kind of deep emotional problem. On the other side of this, if the child knows right from wrong and he can sit down and plan a murder, then you could say if he is old enough to kill someone then he is old enough to die. The juvenile criminal is rooted much deeper than right from wrong. It starts back from when they are small children. Most of them are usually outsiders or outcasts. Who can you hold fault for that other than society? If juveniles don't fit in with the popular kids in school they are considered an
P2 Taking the initiative to change the sentencing age for juveniles will help America not only use funds in a more constructive way, but will also help youth learn from their mistakes without being permanent. In 2004, WSIPP found that those programs such as functional family therapy and aggression replacement training help juveniles control their anger and aggression towards issues that spark inner conflict. Our government has realized this helpful tool and has begun funding these specific programs. As stated in Cost-Benefit analysis of Juvenile Justice Programs article, for every $11.66 that was spent juveniles committing felonies dropped by twenty-four percent. Another beneficial way our government has In Wisconsin, in 2004, it costs $68,255 to house a juvenile for 12 months. If enrolling ones juvenile into the Wraparound Milwaukee services, it has a monthly cost of $3,300 which for twelve months is $39,600 so it would be half the cost of housing in an actual prison and you could put two juveniles into this program for the price of one in prison. With that being said, by rising the age of
On April 10, 2017, as part of FY 2018 Budget, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo signed legislation raising the age for criminal accountability. New York state was one of the states that no matter what the offense was it still processed anyone in the age of sixteen and seventeen as adults in the criminal justice system. Although the legislation raised the age for criminal responsibility, protestors still think that it hasn’t done much for the teenagers who have committed a criminal act. The bill states that sixteen and or seventeen-years-old who have committed a felony crime will still be tried in court as an adult, and those who have committed misdemeanor crime will not be tried in court as an adult. Such bill will highly impact society, the criminal
“I used to believe are our future but now I realize that this, sadly isn’t the reality. Through laws that treat kids like adults, the government is throwing away the future of children in this country.” (D. Lee) An estimated 200,000 juveniles are tried as adults. The term juvenile refers to any young person under the age of 18. For most states in the United States, the age of majority is 18. While there are many things that juveniles are unable to do until they reach the age of 18, being charged as an adult for a crime is not amongst those things in some states. Juveniles are not allowed to vote, drink alcohol, or sign a legal contract, yet they can be charged and treated like adults when it comes to them being
Should juveniles get adult jail sentences? In today's society juvenile offenders are facing the law to full force, in two court systems. Not only are they tried in the juvenile justice system, but also charged as adults. The issue of charging juveniles as adults has stirred various views owing to the violent crimes committed by the young offenders. Politicians comment that the best solution is to lock up juvenile offenders for a long time and ignore rehabilitation. However, prior researches on the topic of juvenile delinquencies suggest that trying young offenders in the adult legal system and putting them in adult prisons will only lead to increased crime, higher costs, and increased violence(John & Jiangmin 568).
Most of the time, the system has proven itself to be unsuccessful in dealing with juvenile crimeMost often, the system is unsuccessful. “There are kids who are five times more likely to be raped or otherwise sexually assaulted in adult prisons than in juvenile facilities. The risk of suicide is likewise much higher for juveniles in adult jails.”(How to reduce crime Pg 3). When juveniles are sent to jail, they are still relatively impressionable from people in the prison, and may go back into crime after they’re released, hindering rehabilitation and just creating another violent criminal in the world. The court sentencing the criminal is also at