preview

Adnan Is Not Guilty Analysis

Decent Essays

You know when you try to defend yourself for something you believe that you did not do?
Trying to clear your name but you feel that you are being ignored. Well this specific scenario, is what Adnan Syed is facing, who was convicted for supposedly killing his ex-girlfriend Hae Min
Lee. Adnan with confidence states that he is not guilty, and explains that he is wrongfully convicted. The Crown came to the conclusion of his guilt by relying to one witness’ testimony,
Jay, who explains Adnan is the person behind Hai’s death, supplying the Crown with a story.
Fortunately, Adnan can be proven not guilty with these few points. First off, the Crown
Attorney provides lack of information and physical evidence to go against Adnan and prove …show more content…

Lastly, the question of Adnan’s motive that the Crown put on him. They believe the reason to why Adnan would be the one who killed Hai is because of his anger towards her leaving him. This motive can be easily argued with witness who can state otherwise. These three reasons can prove why Adnan can be proven not guilty and perhaps allow people to think wisely and optimistically about this situation.

The quality and quantity of evidence is a good tool to have in order to prove someone is guilty. It defends lies and made up stories that people create along the way which they use to defend themselves. Unfortunately, with Adnan’s case, the Crown did not take the importance of evidence into consideration, it is as if the importance of having good evidence and what it could lead into had no meaning for Adnan’s arrest. To start off with the witnesses that supposedly prove Adnan is guilty, they are biased with minimal information to support their reasoning. For example, the witness the Crown leans towards to prove Adnan’s guilt is Jay. Jay is someone who admits to being involved in the crime, assisting Adnan, it would not make sense to allow Jay’s testimony to have the power it received which was the key to

Get Access