The courthouse that was attended was the Small Claims Court, in the Durham Region Courthouse at 150 Bond Street East. This court was attended on October 19, 2016, in courtroom 509. The case that was heard was Adam Rantis (Unrepresented) v. Naresh Kumar Ganeshan (represented by Rajan Mahavalirajan). This was a case involving faulty workmanship, The Plaintiff is suing because he hired an installer to put floor down on the main level of his home. Upon completion of the installation it was found that there were many errors with the floor. The homeowner did not notice any of this until after he had paid the installer. As soon as he noticed he contacted the installer and informed him of the condition of the work. The homeowner also called in a
The trial judge, therefore, entered judgment for plaintiff Foster against defendants Grant and Gray. Grant and Gray appealed.
The defendant, Mr English, was in a dispute with the dealership after his car was stolen while being serviced (this was being dealt with by insurance company but is somewhat of a side note and not so important)
The accused, Greg Adamiec, was charged with assault causing bodily harm under 267 of the criminal code. The incident took place during a Manitoba Major Soccer League game on July 13th, 2009. During the second half of the game, Mr. Adamiec and Mr. Keast both attempted to gain control of the ball. Mr. Keast dove for the ball, grabbing it and the accused’s foot at the same time. The accused tried to break free of Mr. Keast’s grip on his foot by kicking him. This made the accused loose his balance in which he fell to the ground, where he continued to kick Mr. Keast in the chest throat or chin area while he was wearing cleats.
Case 1 is an appeal to the conviction rendered by District Court Judge Bradley on
Procedural History: Appellants filed suit in U.S. District Court which ruled that the Appellants Constitutional rights were violated. Officials from both Burlington and Essex County Appealed
Famous linebacker for the San Francisco 49ers, realesed Aldon Smith after being charged on Friday, September 11, 2015 with three different allegations in connections to drunk driving in Santa Clara, California. Smith was arrested on Thursday night after damaging a parked vechile while attempting to park his own car. Smith then left without reporting the collision or leaving his information at the scence. He was later approached by the police enforcement, he showed sympotoms of being under the influence of alcholol. Officers responded to protocol and admisnstered a field sobriety test. Later that night smith was taken into the Santa Clara County Jail and set his bail at $26,000. Aldon Smith’s case deals with driving under the influence which
What did the trial court do? Who won and lost? What did the trial court say?
In the case of Greene’s Jewelry located in Derry, New Hampshire. v. Jennifer Lawson (Known as The Defendant).
Another case that is quite similar to the above case is Kamloops v. Neilson. Mr Hughes, jr. wanted to build a house on a hillside for this father to retiree in. He submitted his plans to the city and they were approved subject to the footings being taken down to solid bearing, and a building permit was issued. Mr Hughes did not take the footings down to solid bearing; instead he set the foundations on piles, which were set into loose filllings. On December 18 the city inspector arrived and realized the foundations were not in line with the plans but he was unable to check if it was adequate to support the building because the concrete had been poured. The inspector followed up with two more inspection on December 23 and January 2, after these
After three failed attempts at finding a civil case at Howard County Circuit Court about a business related and another two failed attempts at the Baltimore County District Court, I was finally able to attend a civil docket at Baltimore County District Court. The court is located at 900 Walker Avenue, Catonsville, 21228 in Maryland. Most of the cases, I saw when I came at 9: 00 a.m. on November 3rd, 2014 for the morning docket were contract or tort cases and Judge Marsha L. Russell was presiding it as well as encouraged five sets of group to talk Plaintiff Brian DMD Moore vs Defendant Wilbur Lucas, Plaintiff BQ Management, LLC vs Defendant Dameka Carroll, Plaintiff Mercy Medical Center vs. Defendant Melvin R. Cook, Plaintiff Apartment Services vs Bethea J Scherrie and Plaintiff Regional Management vs Defendant Cynthia M Crook. The case numbers for the five cases are 0004632-2014, 0020559-2014, 0020690-2014, 0020636-2014, and 0011960-2014. Another case was dismissed the Plaintiff Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc. vs Harvey Singleton and case number 0020400-2014. One other case was continued for another day Plaintiff Damian Banks vs George Sturton/ Alexis Brown.
Which court did you attend, and what kind of hearing did you observe? (2 marks)
be described. Jurisdictional requirements for this case as well as the reasons why it was heard at
Since the late 1970’s, there has been a strong correlation between mental health disorders and the perpetrators of mass shootings. “Up to 60% of the perpetrators have displayed symptoms including acute paranoia, delusions and depression before committing their crimes” (Metzl & Macleish, 2015). In the case of Adam Lanza, infamously known for the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting, the history of his mental illnesses is quite extensive. However, it has been discovered that when it comes to mental illnesses, it is not influenced by one factor, but rather many factors that have integrated into the individual’s life (Sue, 2014). These factors began affecting Lanza’s life at only two years old, continuing throughout his lifetime until his heinous act of murder at the age of twenty. Throughout his
It was a gloomy Tuesday morning in Camden on March 18, 2014. Spring break had just began and the free time to do the court observation. The Superior Court of New Jersey had begun a civil action court case that was fairly controversial over how to distribute ones pension to their spouse when filing a divorce. When arriving upon the court house, the whole entire environment surrounding the court was very authoritarian. It seems that the court rooms and such are always located where most of the town’s governing takes place, whether it is just a municipal court, or the superior court just as this one. Before arriving, the presumption was that the court house would like every other court house, big building with large marble stone pillars in
We attended the ACT Magistrates Court on 6th October 2017. We observed a criminal case.