Abortion : Pro Choice Or Pro Life Essay

The controversy surrounding the ethicality of abortions has been a hotly debated topic during the past several decades. In the Supreme Court case of Roe v. Wade, the Court ruled that women had the constitutional right to seek abortions; however, in 1989, the Court later decided that each state had the right to set its own abortion policy. Heated disagreements and different perspectives have led to the creation of two different movements: the prochoice movement and the prolife movement. The former supports abortion, the intentional ending of a pregnancy, while the latter claims that abortion is immoral. The issue has been escalated from a matter of choice to the questioning of morality – Is having an abortion the killing of a human?

Abortion is never an easy decision, but women have been making the choice for thousands of years. It has become a large dilemma since 1973, when the U.S. Supreme Court passed a law making the procedure legal, and an even larger controversial issue. The controversy is divided into “Pro-Choice” and Pro-Life” views. Pro-Choice supporters believe that the woman should have to choice whether to abort or not. Pro-Life supporters believe that it should be illegal to abort and preformed. However, there are many ways for this procedure to be performed. Abortion still remains today a controversial issue, by who should determine if it is the right thing to terminate a pregnancy or not and by how the procedure should be preformed.

Abortion is one of the most personal, widely discussed, and controversial topics in American culture today. In most cases, people on both sides of the argument take worthy and moral positions. Who can blame someone who wishes to prevent the termination of a teen pregnancy to save the life of an unborn child? On the other hand, who can blame anyone who advocates the soon-to-be mother's right to make such a personal, heartbreaking choice? No matter what she chooses to do, should anyone have the legal right to force her to bear an unwanted child? Most people in the US are pro-choice, and believe that abortion should be a legal, confidential decision that only a woman can make for herself. However, some are against the idea of

Rawls and Nagel would support Hillary Clinton’s stance on abortion in a secular society, regardless of certain comprehensive doctrines, if we are to call the state just and rational. If we were to consider that women were rational beings, as we should, then rationally the issue of abortion would not be a dilemma. Since we live in a pluralistic society where all citizens comprehensive doctrines are free to be heard, this issue of pro-life and pro-choice becomes a controversy. This creates tension within the public sphere between religious citizens and the public sphere. This can be demonstrated between the different ideology of four theologians. Michael Sandel and Thomas Nagel agree that banning abortion is not correct but they clash in the way that they justify this issue. John Rawls is consistent with Nagel 's theory on the justification of abortion for women but not to the extent of Hillary Clinton’s late pregnancy abortion. Finally Ratzingers argues why rationality can not be the only source for the justification of abortion shows why this causes tensions between the religious citizens and public sphere.

The topic of abortion is a hot subject among the people of America today. Some say yes, women should be able to have abortions no matter if the fetus is in the first trimester or well in to the second trimester of gestation. On the other hand the other people say that it is murder of a child no matter the stage of development. Many of the people that believe that the fertilized ovum is a human and has a soul at the conception are the pro-life people. They believe this because of their religious beliefs and cannot scientifically prove this in any way.

Abortion, the intentional termination of a pregnancy through surgical or medical devices, was legalized in 1973. This issue of abortion has caused a great segregation in our country. Often the debate is thought to be conservative versus liberal, republican versus democrat, but more accurately it is pro-life versus pro choice. A pro-life stance opposes the belief that a woman should have the freedom to choose an abortion in the case that for any reason she does not want to have a baby. Pro-choice takes the opposite stance; pro-choice is a belief that a women should have the autonomy to chose an abortion in the case of an unwanted pregnancy (Freesearch, 2005). Difficult questions get thrown around between the two views. Where does life

Abortion is among one of the world’s greatest debates. Americans hold the notion that someone is either pro-abortion or anti-abortion; there is no in-between. There is so much research to support both sides of the issue. For those who support abortion there is research that says that the choice belongs to every woman. There are certain circumstances that support this claim. A woman’s choice to have an abortion is her right. Is it right? Is it murder? There are countless people that view abortion as a tremendous sin, and strongly believe that it is one of the worst sins that can be committed. A fetus does not have the ability to stand up and argue and fight for their chance to live and breathe in this miraculous world. For the people who stand against abortion, those who believe that it is a woman’s choice are seen as the enemy. Advocates for anti-abortion can turn to protests and other activities to support their opinions on the subject. So, what is right and what is wrong? Each person has the right to choose what they believe in. Just like in any other matter in life. A person was guaranteed the right to choose when they were born. A colossal controversy in the discussion of pro and anti-abortion is whether these unalienable rights pertain to the unborn fetus growing inside the mother who legally has the right to choose. Do these rights only belong to those who have breathed their first breath? Anti-abortion advocates will say that in no way is abortion right. These two

Advocates identifying themselves, as “pro-choice” believe that choosing to have an abortion are a mother’s right and should not be limited by the government or religious authority. The mother’s right to autonomy supersedes the right of a preborn inherent right to life. Opposed to this are “pro-life” supporters, who believe that the fetus’s personhood begins at the time of conception. The government has a responsibility to preserve all human life, and that rights of personhood should be granted. Putting religion and social views aside, there is irrefutable evidence of potential for

One of the first moral issues addressed by both sides of the abortion debate concerns a pregnant woman’s so-called natural “right” to make “reproductive choices.” (“The Rights of Pregnant Women”) Anti-abortion advocacy groups claim that “the only way to actually protect the mother’s rights will be by enforcing laws that secure her child’s right to life,” (“Argument 2”) whereas pro-abortion groups contend that these laws “create a dangerous precedent for wide-ranging government intrusion into the lives of all women.” (“The Rights”) With two fundamentally contrasting viewpoints at odds with each other, it is apparent that one of the core issues concurrent with abortion is a woman’s rights versus the rights of her unborn fetus.

About 20 million, out of 45 million, abortions are medically unsafe and can lead to serious injury or death to mothers (Ojeda 13). Illegalizing abortion would bring up the number of medically unsafe abortions. People say abortions should be illegal to stop the killing of unborn babies. The mothers are the ones who really get to decide if they want to be pregnant for nine months or if they want to get rid of the baby that may have been caused by rape, broken condom, or many other reasons. Many bad events could happen if abortion became illegal. The government should make sure that abortion stays legal.

To most pro-choice advocates, an embryo/fetus is not considered a person, because the apparent pain a fetus experiences during an abortion is false, and most people do not believe that life begins at conception. The main concern surrounding abortion for pro-choicers stems from a woman’s right to control her body and what happens to it. Just as a woman is able to decide when she takes birth control, and when she has sex, she should also be able to decide when she has an abortion.. Many say that no baby should be born into an unstable environment where it is unwanted, and that abortion eliminates many of those cases. Since both parties know abortions will happen regardless of legalism, making abortion legal also reduces the amount of abortions performed underground. Therefore, it is safer for women if abortions are

The argument of abortion is primarily a moral issue that has created a divide between two groups of people. In general, the two opposing groups are pro-life and pro-choice. Pro-life includes those who do not support abortion, namely the Texas republican party. Pro-choice includes those who support a woman’s choice to have an abortion namely the Texas democratic party. One of the many arguments made against abortion is that, “abortion is prima facie wrong because it deprives someone of a ‘future like ours’.” (Saad). Those who are pro-life believe a human fetus becomes a person upon conception. By having an abortion, a woman is essentially committing murder by terminating what they consider a person. Some pro-life advocates also believe that abortifacients should be illegal because they prevent the natural process of a fetus to form. The Texas Republican Platform states that, “We call upon the Texas Legislature to enact legislation stopping the

Abortion has become a sensitive topic for many. Personally, I have pro-life beliefs with pro-choice circumstances. Although I do not agree with the overall concept of abortions, I know it will continue to happen whether I like it or not. Thus, I prefer the process to be done safely. Additionally, no matter what my opinion is, everyone has their own rights. After reading this article, there are many aspects in which I agree with Carol Sanger. Firstly, I agree with her statements on the ultrasound laws, “to be persuaded against exercising the right you came in with.” I do not agree with the ultrasound laws. A women should have the right to choose if she wants to see the ultrasound pictures or not. They should not be forced in order to change

What is an abortion? An abortion is a term that refers to terminating a pregnancy by removing the fetus or embryo before its ready for birth. There are two types of abortions; we have a spontaneous and purposeful abortion. A spontaneous abortion is often known as a miscarriage while a purposeful abortion is induced.

Abortion is one of the most controversial subjects currently in society. There is an abounding amount of contrasting speculations on whether abortion is acceptable or not. Individuals who are pro-life may argue that abortion is unacceptable because of religious views or because they believe that the termination of a fetus is murder. They may also argue that the fetus can feel pain, although before 24 weeks the fetus lacks the physical capacity to feel pain. Citizens who are pro-choice believe that a woman should have the freedom to control her body and be able to have an abortion. As a result of these conflicting opinions, it