Abortion Argumentative Analysis

As a consequence, the ruling set the path toward new restrictive abortion laws that can completely block having an abortion. In Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt (2016), the Court recognized an undue burden was placed when Texas placed restrictions on the delivery of abortion providers. Justice Ginsburg, concurring with the majority states, “When a State severely limits access to safe and legal procedures, women in desperate circumstances… , faute de mieux, at great risk to their health and safety” (“Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt” Cornell 10). Having limited options to an abortion will lead women to another alternative that consists of an unsafe abortion. While this ruling upheld women’s right to a safe and legal abortion, States still have the opportunity to intervene and persuade women to not get an abortion as seen in Hellerstedt. Through the rulings made in Roe, Casey, and Hellerstedt, society has slowly progressed in accepting women have the basic liberty to control reproduction. Some individuals have learned to put aside their religious and moral beliefs when it comes to making a decision that will affect women. Overall, the United States still remains at conflict over the controversial subject of abortion. We as a nation have learned women have the basic liberty to decide over their body and terminate a pregnancy,

wade. “Repeated challenges since 1973 narrowed the scope of Roe v. Wade but did not overturn it. In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992), the Supreme Court established that restrictions on abortion are unconstitutional if they place an “undue burden” on a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus is viable” (). “Since the roe decision, anti abortion lawmakers have not been able to ban abortion outright. Instead, they have developed a very successful strategy of limiting a woman’s access to the procedure and restricting the procedures that physicians can use to perform it” (76). “The restrictions that were given made life harder for women. All of these laws are meant to dissuade a woman from going through with the abortion. Feminists oppose the restrictions. They view the laws as condescending to women, who they feel know how to make up their own minds about this personal, private decision” (77). “When they eventually make their way back to a clinic, they may be much farther along in the pregnancy, when the procedure becomes more invasive, potentially more dangerous to the mother, and much more expensive” (77). “For some clinics, the expenses brought on by TRAP laws are so high the facilities shut down. By the fall of 2014, only eight abortion clinics in Texas were still standing. Before the law, some 10,000 Texas women had to travel more than 200 miles

Women’s reproductive rights were on center stage when a case from Texas made its way to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court heard the case Roe v. Wade, and nullified a Texas law making it illegal to abort a fetus during a pregnancy, for any reason.2 The court moved a traditionally state-regulated policy into a federally protected right for women.3 What some legal analysts feel is odd, is the arbitrary way the justices decided the first-trimester timeline, and if the Constitution can recognize right to privacy.4 The ruling was a split decision, and has still kept the country split in their

In the case of Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas v. Abbott (2014), The American Civil Liberties Union, The Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the Center for Reproductive Rights, and a Texas law firm filed a lawsuit in federal court on behalf of several women’s health-care providers in Texas for seeking to enforce their rights and those of patients for declaratory judgment and pertaining to the regulation of surgical abortions and abortion-inducing drugs by enjoining two provisions of the 2013 Texas House Bill No. 2. (Planned Parent Hood v. Abbott, 2014). To many, Planned Parenthood challenges the state of Texas abortion law as it places an unconstitutional restriction on a woman’s right to obtain an abortion. It also

As she stood in front of 5,000 men and women at the Texas Capitol, she stood in front of a much larger audience than expected. Her speech targeted women and men wanting a better life for them and their families. During the weekend before she spoke Rick Perry, knowing she is a single mother accused her of “not learning her lesson” (Koh, Luthra). He was pushing her to a limit that she did not appreciate. She attacked him in her speech by stating “I was lucky enough to be able to make the choices in my life that I knew would work for me. And I don’t regret for one minute my decisions about my daughters, my education or my direction in life.” She pushed through what Rick Perry said about her, by showing her strength in her speech about her past. As abortion rights lay as a big issue, she makes a statement about the issue in the speech. She suggested a better way of limiting unwanted pregnancy by suggesting “investing in good family planning services and honest, effective, age-appropriate sex education” rather than regulating abortion. At the rally, a few women

The issue of abortion is one of the most controversial topics of our time, but recently the amount of public interest has grown exponentially. A number of bills regarding this policy issue such as Defund Planned Parenthood Act of 2015 and Child Interstate Notification Act have both greatly influenced the public’s opinion of abortion. Although, the issue of abortion hasn’t always been like this; according to Timeline of Abortion Laws and Events, an article from the Chicago Tribune, “The earliest anti-abortion laws were intended to protect women from untrained abortionists.” (Timeline) Since the 1973 passing of the Supreme Court Case, Roe V Wade, women have been able to obtain the abortion procedure in all 50 states, 46 of which were

The case surrounding the right to abortion began in 1969 when Norma McCorvey became pregnant. McCorvey, “who was opposed to having a child, traveled to Dallas, Texas, where she attempted to lie about her method conception in order to obtain an abortion”(Richards, Adams). Unfortunately, McCorvey’s attempts were futile when “her ruse was unveiled and the state refused to permit a legal abortion”(Richards, Adams). This denial prompted McCorvey to seek legal counsel to challenge the state of Texas on the basis that the statute “violated the Fourteenth Amendment mandating equal protection of the laws an the guarantee of personal liberty, an a mother’s right

For many years abortion has been the topic of controversy among the political, social and religious spectrum. Each holds individuals with dichotomous views on the legality of abortion. In recent times, the topic of abortion has returned to the courts to challenge political and religious opposing views. In this case, Texas has attempted to combine their religious perspective of abortion into the political sphere by demanding laws restricting abortion practices in clinics. On the other hand, liberal women and women’s rights groups are demanding the unconstitutionality of these restrictions. Therefore the restriction of women’s reproductive rights in laws that are being implemented in Texas should be rejected because of its potential threat

Abortion, one of the most controversial topics mentioned in this county, especially the state of Texas, continues to be scrutinized from both sides of the spectrum. In 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme court ruled that abortion would be legalized on a federal level, however, many states including Texas have placed restrictions on the procedure. The question here should not be based on a moral standard, but rather, what is the right of the women and her say in her body. This essay will review both views on abortion along with the laws on abortion here in Texas.

This is that due to the fact that abortion access in Texas has been considerably declining mainly because of the passage and proclamation of the Texas Senate Bill, it is more prudent to engage the moral and divine angel of the entire matter. This is after statistical evidence shows that there were approximately 44 different facilities which are known to have been performing abortions in Texas in the year 2011 alone and futuristic projections deem that these has dropped to six facilities currently in 2015. This can even be proved by those who tried to keep the doors of these abortion enhancing facilities open but they failed miserably. For instance, Amy Hagstrom Miller who happens to be the chief executive of a renowned health fraternity called the Whole Woman’s Health group was unable to successfully challenge the provisions and stipulations of the Texas Senate Bill in a court of law (Thomas

The Affordable Care Act was a funded mandate issued by the federal government use funding to help persuade states in implementing the new healthcare reform. With almost half the country, including Texas, refusing to enact Obamacare, there is an obvious difference between what the states and the federal government want. The controversy surrounding Planned Parenthood and similar clinics is the ethical debate of abortion. Single-issue groups, interest groups that primarily focus on one specific issue like pro-life and pro-choice advocates relentlessly fight for their beliefs on the merits of abortion and seemingly, pro-life resonated with Texas policymakers. Policymaking starts in the interest of the people and their concerns which is translated to the state and local government through public interests and elections. The issue will be discussed for the state’s policy agenda whether to be pursued further. In this case, pulling funding from Planned Parenthood, which was introduced by the people and given to the attention local and state officials, will now be debated to be made an official state policy, which was successful in the favor of pro-life advocates. But by defunding Planned Parenthood, many low-income women no longer have access to effective birth control or other forms of healthcare. Krugman, in his opinion, insists that political participation of the people is the only way to prevent unfavorable state and local candidates to hold public office and therefore, prevent unfavorable legislation to be passed within state government that may negatively impact the state and its

Abortion is a controversial debate in the United States that divides the nation and still plays a significant role at election time. The Democratic Party supports abortion rights and keeping elective abortions legal because they believe in the privacy and equality of women. They believe that a woman must have the right to choose regardless of her ability to pay. “The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade.”1 For example, Bernie Sanders, as a Democratic candidate, said, "I happen to believe that it is wrong for the government to be telling a woman what to be doing with her own body."2 On the other hand, Republicans say the unborn child has a fundamental right to live and they support a human life amendment to the Constitution. They believe that Roe v. Wade should be overturned and abortions should not be legal.3 Donald Trump, as a Republican candidate, has suggested that if abortion is criminalized, women should receive some type of punishment if they secure an abortion. The President of the United States can has many effects on federal abortion policy. Most important of all, the President has the power to appoint justices to the United States Supreme Court. For instance, Obama and Clinton appoint justices who will uphold the present abortion laws that allow abortions. Also, the President may sign or veto legislation related to abortion like President Bush has signed “the Partial-Birth Abortion

Texas has a long history of conflict with the federal government over laws and policies, particularly when dealing with environmental, social, and educational issues. Texas has conservative right-wing views and has been in conflict more often with the federal government since President Obama has been in office. The dilemma generally arises from a clash in opposing political and social views. One major issue that has arisen in over the course of the last two years has been a battle over funding for Planned Parenthood. Although the courts have deemed that this quarrel is not about abortion rights or access to abortion, the truth of the matter is that it really is. Texas leaders are against abortion and are trying to skirt federal law that allows abortion by imposing their personal agenda opposing abortion or anything that seemingly supports abortion on the Texas people. The problem is that in the midst of this chaos, low-income women of Texas are the ones who are suffering through the loss of basic and preventative healthcare.

"The State of Texas will be unable to fully implement HB 2's common sense regulations to protect the health and safety of women at substandard abortion facilities. Our work to protect mothers and unborn babies from abortion will continue."" In my opinion, abortion should not be legal. Abortion is in a way, murder. You are killing a human being without probable cause. Understood, that some people may not be able to take care of a kid; however, why would you risk a humans' life, instead of trying to find it a home. I am 100% against abortion, for that reason. One person will not even get the chance to live, for another individuals pleasure of not having the care for them. To conclude, I do not think it is right for people to kill a individual, when they didn't make they mistake; the individual carrying the baby however,

The topic of abortion and its legality is one that is strongly felt on both sides of the issue. This is one of the most heated arguments you can get into and if I am being fully honest I am a little nervous about publicizing my view point. But here is my research and arguments for whether abortion should be legal or not.