Restoring and strengthening the identities of First Nations, Métis and Inuit Children through Early Childhood Education and Care: A UNCRC approach
Annotated Bibliography
Children’s Rights
Professor Rachel Caplan
Brooke Groombridge- McLeod
Ryerson University Introduction In Canada today, many Aboriginal children are facing a greater deal of challenges among the much larger national landscape. Often experiencing higher rates of poverty, crime, substance abuse, and child welfare, many Aboriginal peoples continue to struggle to reach equity amongst their fellow Canadians. It is important to consider that some of the issues Aboriginal children and their families are facing today, are a reflection of the historical context of Canadian
…show more content…
Therefore I argue that through culturally appropriate early childhood education and care, it is possible to reclaim and strengthen the identities of First Nations, Métis and Inuit children. Using the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC, 1989), signed by Canada, will provide groundwork for this argument, to support children’s rights and further provide considerations for policy change and implementation. Specifically, in the UNCRC article 8 the preservation of identity, article 30 the right to learn and practice one’s own culture and article 29 the goals of education will execute the rights of a child and support positive identity development for all Aboriginal children.
Theoretical Framework In order to highlight the importance of culturally-specific education for Aboriginal children, it can be suggested that combining a rights based approach with a cultural capability theoretical framework will allow for such transformational change to occur. By using a rights based approach will allow for the rights of the child to not only be considered but also effectively incorporated into today’s early education and care policies and practices. Additionally, cultural capability theory, defined as “the belief that when values and expectations of the classroom are harmonious with those of the
What historical forces have contributed to the situation of Tom and his family, and how do you, as the social worker see yourself implicated in this historical overview.
It also provides some detailed analysis of the tensions between Aboriginal communities and the federal government. Furthermore, the article also seeks to interpret the deculturalization occurred to Aboriginals, in which Canadian government organizations took Aboriginal children from their communities and educated them in residential schools. This attempt at assimilation of Aboriginal Canadians was a disaster. Many were physically and sexually abused, and many returned to their communities as broken and destitute
Canada holds a shameful history of operating beyond 130 residential schools for the Aboriginal Children during 1800’s until late 1900’s (“Misconceptions of Canada’s Indian Residential School System” 2007). Due to the implementation of the Indian Act in 1876, more than 100 000 Aboriginal children between the ages of four and sixteen years old were forced out of their homes, separated from their family, and sent to the residential schools to be assimilated into Euro-Canadian cultures (ANISHINABEK, 2013). The residential schools were operated by the churches and were funded by the Government of Canada. The main reason for sending the children to the residential schools was due to the strong belief that the assimilation has to start with the children to make them a civilized human beings as the Aboriginal were seen as “savages”. (NEEGANAGWEDGIN,
In conclusion, the Indian Status should be modified, not destroyed; therefore, First Nations should be able to identify as what they are but still have the same rights as everyone else. Residential schools did more child abuse than they did teaching, inflicting pain and shaming young children isn’t education and will never lead to it. In addition, how are the Aboriginals supposed to trust Canadians and adapt to the Euro-Canadian lifestyle if the government blatantly lies to
The current outcome of the Sixties Scoop is still unresolved; it was only in 2010 that a class action suit was brought to the courts in Ontario and 2011 from survivors in British Columbia. Restitution for this is far from over. According to John Beaucage the former Grand Chief of the Union of Ontario Indians, we have now entered a new stage in the assimilation of aboriginals called the “Millennium Scoop”. In his report commissioned by the Ministry Children and Youth Services he states “Although Aboriginal people make up about 2 per cent of the province’s population (2006 Census); we make up a far greater percentage of the children in care (estimates are from 10 to 20 per cent)” (Beaucage, 2011). While this is information is based on one report it does produce viable solutions and a basis for additional research.
From the 1870’s until the last school closed in 1996, at least 150,000 Indigenous children attended residential schools in Canada. More than 130 government mandated schools existed across the country. These schools were church administered, with the express purpose of forcibly removing Indigenous children from their native culture, in an effort to assimilate them into Euro-Canadian culture and thereby “kill the Indian in the child”. Countless families were torn apart as the Canadian government placed
First Nation Peoples within Canada have been facing many injustices in their homeland since the dawn of colonization. The most unraveling point to First Nation assimilation was the formation of the consequential Indian Act and residential schools resulting in a stir of adversity. As racist ideologies within Canada developed, upheaval against such treatment was undertaken as First Nation communities fought back against government land claims and eradication of treaty rights. In attempt to make amends, proper compensations from the injustices within residential schools have been released and the key for the future is allowing First Nation self-government. Ideals with the intent of ultimate assimilation have been standardized unto First Nation
Aboriginal people in Canada are the native peoples in North America within the boundaries of present-day Canada. In the 1880’s there was a start of residential schools which took Aboriginal kids from their family to schools to learn the Roman Catholics way of culture and not their own. In residential schools Aboriginal languages were forbidden in most operations of the school, Aboriginal ways were abolished and the Euro-Canadian manner was held out as superior. Aboriginal’s residential schools are careless, there were mental and physical abuse, Aboriginals losing their culture and the after effects of residential schools.
Teachers in Australia have the responsibility of catering to the learning needs and abilities of the students in their classroom. Additionally they are also responsible for catering to the unique cultural backgrounds of each student, in particular the cultures of Indigenous Australians. The teacher can cater to the diverse and complex Indigenous cultures by creating a learning environment that is based on effective student engagement for Aboriginal students. Studies have shown that Aboriginal students are currently not academically achieving as well as non-Aboriginal students (What Works: Core Issue 5). Closing the academic performance gap is considered a national priority. As a result, the Aboriginal Cultural Standards Framework has been developed to ensure that schools are delivering the best possible education to all students, specifically those who identify as Aboriginal. During term 3, 2017, I completed my final practicum at Baler Primary School in a year 4 classroom. The students in my class came from a diverse range of cultural backgrounds, many of which identified as Aboriginal. Throughout this essay I will use examples from my final practicum at Baler Primary School in South Hedland to discuss how to make learning engaging, accessible and culturally responsive for Aboriginal students.
The Truth and Reconciliation Report has outlined 94 Calls to Action to work towards reconciliation between Canada and Indigenous people. Action 63 calls for education institutions to improve the curriculum on Indigenous people’s history and to integrate Indigenous knowledge. Currently, research has indicated that there is a lack of Indigenous content in the K to 12 education system and, if taught, it is through a Eurocentric lens. Due to this, non-Indigenous students in university have misguided and preconceived notions of Indigenous people. And as a result, stereotypes are reinforced which leads to microaggressions for Indigenous students in higher education. This is why it is important for post-secondary institution develop Indigenous educational programming that works and that research in this area is
Despite the challenges and changes that still need to be made to insure no Aboriginal Child is left behind, there are changes currently being made that show the benefits of a culturally responsive program and bring hope to the future of Aboriginal early childhood education. The Aboriginal Head Start early childhood education program is slowly expanding. As well other programs have developed, like Awasisk Cultural Development Program in Prince George, British Columbia that uses Metis curriculum and Mannawasis AHS programs that teaches both Cree and English (Nguyen, 2011). I believe that these programs are the foundation for a future where all Aboriginal children have an opportunity to be educated through their cultural traditions and language.
The impact of colonization on First Nations peoples in Canada is unsurpassable, regarding every aspect of Aboriginal life and well-being. Throughout Canadian history, the government has been aiming to assimilate and annihilate Aboriginal people by way of racist policies, ethnocentric institutions, discriminatory laws and destructive capitalist behaviours. Because of this, Aboriginal people have suffered many losses, both physically and culturally. One of the main perpetrators of enacting this loss is the education system. The education system in Canada has and continues to threaten the relationship First Nations peoples have with the land. The connection First Nations peoples have with the land is crucial to their cultures, traditions, ceremonies and beliefs. Colonization and colonialism jeopardize this relationship and that is what this essay will address.
The last twenty years has seen these themes played out in both policy and practice. Indigenous self-determination had played a big part in educational policy since the 1970s but by 2012 Marcia Langton in her Boyer Lectures attacked the concept as a “vaporous dream” (Schwab, R.G., 2013,p. 212)with critiques fuelled by the Little Children Are Saved Report. Langton saw Noel Pearson’s Cape York Aboriginal Australian Academy as an alternative model focused on outcomes but incorporating Indigenous art, culture and sport. This is actually a “top down”
From 1863 to 1996, many Indigenous child were forced to attend residential schools, where they were separated from their families and culture and experienced neglect, abuse and trauma (Bombay, Matheson, & Anisman, 2011, p.367). This essay will explore the history and purpose of residential schools, how it impacted Indigenous children and families at the time of the events, and how to this day it still affects them. Indigenous Residential Schools impacted the First Peoples of Canada physically, mentally and emotionally which resulted in their loss of identity, culture, spirituality, and traditions in the past and present.
Residential schools in Canada were present for over 100 years and were created by the government to eliminate the Indigenous culture. These schools successfully separated families while creating huge cultural barriers between children and their Native culture (COHA, 2011). These children were forcibly removed from their families and taken to residential schools because Canadians saw Indigenous peoples as “backwards” or “savage” (COHA, 2011). They also believed that they were inferior to Natives and that these schools would help “civilize” aboriginals by replacing their Native traits with Western values (COHA, 2011).