Abbreviation's Typicality Index Results

Please note that you do NOT have to convert these into percentages. You may leave them in a count format.

received an accuracy level of 98%, which would indicate that John finds this level of reading

The 2nd Factor is Agreeableness (AKA Friendliness) and my score is 23 which is relatively low. The score

In this chapter, I will analyse the data according to the principles proposed, such as Likert’s scale. According to the data collected, I will come out with certain conclusions to predict the respondents’

(Strongly disagree = 1, Disagree = 2, Somewhat disagree = 3, Neutral = 4 Somewhat agree = 5, Agree = 6 and Strongly agree = 7). The lower the mean, the stronger the disagreement with the statement; and the higher the mean, the stronger the agreement with the statement). N = The total number of responses

Description Positive attitudes Negative attitudes Strongly Agree (SA) 4.50 - 5 .00 1 Agree (A) 3.50 - 4.49 2 Undecided (U) 2.50 - 3.49 3 Disagree (D) 1.50 - 2.49 4 Strongly Disagree (SD) 1.00 – 1.49 5

For young girls, the figure was 10%. (background essay)

an 82). Both quizzes seem to be pretty accurate. I find being around a lot of people and being in

Point three percent away from tying with Clinton, because of this he received twenty one

I shared my temperament result with my three best friends. They were agreed with the results. It is same as my

On the Personal History Questionnaire Sexual Attraction Scale using a 10 point ranking system (0= no sexual interest to that age/gender and 10= as much interest as possible to that age/gender) RACKLEY ranked his sexual attraction to males in every age bracket as 0 in the past and 0 now. RACKLEY ranked his sexual attraction to females in the age groups of 5 through 13 as 0 in the past and 0 now. RACKLEY ranked his sexual attraction to females 14 through 16 as 5 in the past and 0 now. He ranked his sexual attraction to females 17 and older as 10 in the past and as 10 now.

The next set of questions consisted of statements where the participants needed to choose one response the best expressed the incident in which they agree or disagree he from one being strongly agree to five being strongly disagree. The first statement was "Officers protect the community." The outcome was 23.6% of the individuals strongly agreed 21.8% agreed. There were 38.2% of the participants who were unsure, 7.3% of the participants who disagree and 9.1% who

Kulas and Stachowski (2008) summed up the reasons for the “false middle” as the “middle response category being at least occasionally utilized as a ‘‘dumping ground” for not applicable, uncertain, indifferent or ambivalent response orientations”. They also recommended including a non-applicable (N/A) response option to help to distinguish the ‘‘dumping ground” orientation from ‘‘valid” middle category responses. Much has been written about the effects of including a middle-point or “neutral option”, however, when the data has already collected, it is imperative that a decision is made on how to analyse it. This is the propose of this paper: to show some options on how to deal with excess middle responses, when the middle seems to have been

The teacher will write the following question on the board, and ask students to guess what they think the percentage or number is.

by ten percent. One can see why this is such a disturbing problem in politics today.