Peace is ‘a state or period in which there is no war or a war has ended’ as the dictionairy defines it. This is commonly refered to as negative peace. It also means the lack of violence between people, may it be groups, societies or individuals. A political realm always strives to obtain at least this kind of peace, craving a world without violence. The question arises what kind of king a monarchy would need to reach this kind of peace? With other words, could a vicious king bring and also preserve peace to his kingdom, or would such a king always result in a violent state?
In the play of Macbeth, Macbeth is crowned the king of Scotland. Macbeth is mostly a vicious man. He does have some virtues at the beginning of the play, such as his capacity to love, his courage and also his nature which is ‘full o' the milk of human kindness’ . During the play however, Macbeth is mostly driven by his vices, such as his ‘’vaulting ambition’’ . He may not be the typical villain of most stories, but he is still a mostly vicious man. There is no doubt Macbeth is a ‘tyrant, whose sole name blisters our tongues’
A tyrant can bring a certain kind of peace to the state. People may not live happily in such a state. They would be afraid of displeasing their tyrannian king and on their toes every second of every day. However, there would be no war, neither internal nor external. There would be no actual violence in the true sense of the word.
In the play of Macbeth we see no violence
What would happen if a king had absolute control over a country with unrestricted power? Would the country thrive, or would it collapse? King Louis XIV is a prime example of this and his absolute monarchy, as he practically did whatever he wanted, whenever he wanted. There were pros and cons to his rule. In one way, he was the most notable king in all of France’s time, making them one of the most powerful countries in Europe at the time.
William Shakespeare’s Macbeth is a tragedy in which the main characters are obsessed by the desire for power. Macbeth’s aspiration for power blinds him to the ethical implications of his dreadful acts. The more that Shakespeare’s Macbeth represses his murderous feelings, the more he is haunted by them. By analyzing his hallucinations it is possible to trace his deteriorating mental state and the trajectory of his ultimate fall. Throughout the play Macbeth is never satisfied with himself. He feels the need to keep committing crime in order to keep what he wants most: his kingship. The harder Macbeth tries to change his fate the more he tends to run into his fate. His ambition and struggle for power was Macbeth’s tragic flaw in the play.
Having a bad tempered king can cause a lot of bad stuff that can happen to the colonist. The king has proved that his bad temper has affected the colonist like when the king cause the war of Lexington and concord and cause the colonist to lose their peace.
In cases where both the subjects and the monarch are happy with shared views on absolute ruling properly, the ruler should first unify his people to have the same goals as him which is to help their country be successful powerfully and financially. If the absolute monarch uses his power to his advantage, then the the subjects would not share the same view as their monarch, because they are living in poverty and unfair conditions, whereas the king is living in luxury and enjoying all the food they please. The subjects' view depend greatly on how they live their life, they might want everyone to live equally with enough food and money to get by, and to get rid of the gap between the powerful and the powerless. The rulers and the subjects have one ideal in common which is to help their country expand and prosper. Both the ruler and the subjects' views are so different since they are leading such contrasting lives, but a common ground they have is their country. They want their country to be great and powerful and they both hold much pride in living and calling it their
Absolute monarchy where a ruler man or woman has complete control over the government. Some may view monarchy as a way to keep everything under control, while most individuals view it as a way a ruler can torment his subjects to his bidding. Rulers viewed proper role of an absolute monarchy as a way to unite the people, on the other hand in their subjects perspective it was a cruel rule and the reason for their laborious life.
They are not care about the people needs but more focus to their intention that can give benefit to them. For example, country that uses militarism is United State because it has own nuclear weapons and can make others country fear with its country. In contrast, in good perspective ways, militarism can motivate people to become more discipline and obey the decision that government make. For example, in Malaysia we use militarism when implement law or policy such as Road Transportation Act 1987. It wants educate road drivers to drive safely in roads if they disobey it, they will get punishment from authority. While in pacifism, it uses peaceful way to solve the problem and not use the power to enforce people to do what they want. During Rasulluah S.W.T as a leader in Islam civilization, he like to discuss and ask opinion from people before make decision because it want to avoid dissatisfaction among people. It wants to create harmonious and peaceful among society and create good relationship with other countries. Through this way, it will make other country respect with his ways and can influence people heart without use coercive power to win people heart. So, Islam as the best example we can use to ensure peaceful in the country and wars is not best alternatives to guarantee peaceful in the
As works of literature mature, the line between good and bad begins to become unclear. With Shakespeare’s works especially, things are usually not what they initially seem; a character may reveal to be the protagonist, antagonist, or even an anti-hero. A character may take actions that border on the antagonistic side, but still be the protagonist in which the audience is emotionally, though not always ethically, invested in. An anti-hero can be viewed simply as a protagonist who lies somewhere on the spectrum of villain and hero; never quite touching each end. In his play, Macbeth, Shakespeare makes it clear that Macbeth is really an anti-hero through his changing public appearance, his encounters with the witches, and his feelings concerning his own actions.
In the Shakespearian play, Macbeth cannot be solely responsibly for the tyranny that he causes. Macbeths close relationship with lady Macbeth and his own ambitions to become king lead him to many evil actions. This relationship causes many fatalities, which is turn leads to changes in the personality of lady Macbeth and this can be seen, as she has difficulty in coping with the situation that she has put herself in. However, slow reactions by other characters in the play, may have been the cause many unnecessary events to occur. But, theses may not have mattered is it wasn’t for the apparitions given to two characters by the evil sisters, these
It is too late to save the earth; across the world we witness severe attacks done to innocent people from extremist groups who want to conquer land and power. Take for example the war on Syria-- that has been ongoing for six whole years; and has claimed the lives of almost half a million of civilians. Women and kids among them and an end to this is nowhere to be seen. Parks, cities, and the infrastructure of Syria is heartbreaking; not to mention the economic downfall and refugee crisis happening. This is the causes and effects of a tyrant in office. As a result, Assad and MacBeth share a similar trait to ambition and both have revolutionized the roles of dictators and villains in our society.
In the play “Macbeth” we strongly agree about the statement “The most effective villain is one who attracts and repels.” Our essay includes or talks about the most effective villain which is Macbeth due to his crimes that he has committed and how he has changed throughout in the play. A theme that most supports this statement is “Appearance vs Reality,” of Macbeth. We will also include examples of the different appearances of Macbeth in different situations. To back up our statement there will be quotes which express the appearance of emotions on Macbeth’s face at time or situation and connect it with reality. “Did he really mean what he said or did?” The essay will also discuss about the different language features which are used in the quotes like, repetition.
In Shakespeare’s Macbeth, the story of an ambitious royal turns into the followings of a murderous tyrant. The Thane of Cawdor, Macbeth, is motivated by his fear that his deep desires will not come true, and his tyrant, gender role-breaking wife, Lady Macbeth, to kill off various successors to the throne. Macbeth is introduced as an ambitious heir to the the throne, but is quickly displayed as a raging king. In William E. Cain’s essay “Murderous Thinking in Macbeth”, he describes the relationship between the audience and Macbeth as “sympathetically connected.” Macbeth is seen as a vicious tyrant to the rest of the characters, but his deep desires are seen by the audience or readers. The audience is shown Macbeth’s guilt and remorse throughout the play, up until he kills Macduff’s family. Macbeth obtains the mindset of a power hungry, murderous tyrant when he kills Macduff’s family.
In the play, Macbeth, Shakespeare uses indirect characterization to compare Macbeth and Lady Macbeth’s personalities to convey that one’s actions do not define a person’s identity. In closer view of Macbeth and Lady Macbeth, after Macbeth had assassinated King Duncan, he immediately felt guilty for his actions, “ Lisnt’ning their fear. I could not say ‘Amen’/When they did say ‘God bless us”’(2.2.39-40). Macbeth’s sorrowful state of mind after committing treachery portrays him as a man with a frail mind, who cannot stay strong through the actions that he commits. Macbeth can also be described as a cold-blooded man, whose greed for power led him to backstab his own king and kin. However, his actions provide a skewed perception of his true character.
In the short story, City of Peace, the author configured a vast imaginative world with a deep underlying meaning within it. The deep underlying meaning within the story being that when it comes to Peace and War, humans have the choice to follow either one. The story starts with Peace and how he created the city. The city became filled with people who adored Peace for its marvelous work and rulership. And later on in the story War intrudes on their tranquility and entraps Peace. Sooner than later the humans have converted themselves into a chaotic civilization, so far choosing to follow War.As stated in the short story,” Anarchy ensues immediately: fighting, screaming, yelling, wailing over the state of their destroyed city…Families argue, neighbors
In Shakespeare’s Macbeth, malicious characters are portrayed as obviously evil and influential. Macbeth, however, is one character that is not represented in this way, in fact he is quite the opposite. The new king is seen as a victim of his foul wife’s influences and the witches prophecies but is really only supported by them and these ideas, leading him to make decisions based on evil ambition and a wicked desire for power. Readers are pushed to believe that Macbeth deserves sympathy, but as all humans do, Macbeth has free will allowing him to make his own decisions which means that if he were a victim, he would only be this due to his depraved actions.
In perhaps the most pivotal scene in William Shakespeare’s Macbeth, Lady Macbeth’s motives are truly revealed in her manipulation of Macbeth to show how humans have a desire for power and once they get a taste of it, they will go through any lengths to have it, no matter the effect on others. Her lust for power is showcased through how she persuades Macbeth by insulting his masculinity and using emotive language to counter his logical reasoning. This section of the play illustrates the tipping point of each character’s morality with Macbeth having second thoughts about the planned murder and Lady Macbeth diving straight in.