Leadership is one of the most important issues in any business organization, company, and group—family, church, school, and associations. So in order to check successes or failures of any business organization, one has to first check the leader’s effectiveness. In other words, “show me a successful business organization or group, and I will show you an effective leader.” And according to Meese and Ortmeier (2010), leadership is defined and described as a trait, the focus of group process, the art of inducing compliance, an exercise of influence, a kind of behavior or act, a form of persuasion, a power relationship, an instrument or process for goal attainment, an effective interaction, a differentiated role, the initiation or maintenance of structure, the process of arranging a situation, the ability to direct or coordinate relationships, an activity that mobilizes people, and as a social meaning-making process. Additionally, there are different types of leaders, but I will briefly highlight three types just for the purpose of this discussion. They includes: Servant leader, Covenant leader, and Narcissistic leader.
First, servant leader, according to Wheeler (2015), is a type of leadership where the leader serves the people he/she leads. It is informed that by studying the leadership style of Jesus can also influence one to change the way he or she leads others and if also the knowledge gained is applied properly in an organizational context, it can also change the
Servant leadership is a theory based on Robert K Greenleaf’s belief that all men have a primary motivation to serve others and through this service they aspire to lead (Parris & Peachey, 2012). Although this leadership model has very little in common with charismatic and situational does however compare to transformational leadership in several areas. The main area of commonality between the two can be found as transformational leaders serve as stewards to change enable the followers to accept the change and move forward with the organization (Tichy & Devanna, 1990, p. 75). In essence, servant leadership becomes the long-term transformational approach to life and work.
Originating in the seminal work of Greenleaf, servant leadership is a paradoxical approach to leadership that challengers our traditional beliefs about leadership and influence. Servant leadership emphasizes that leaders should be attentive to the needs of the followers, empower them, and help them develop their full human capacities. They build strong relationships, with others, are empathic, and ethical, and lead in ways that serve the greater good of followers, organizations, and the community.
If you could choose anyone in the world, who would you choose for your role model? Without a doubt, mine would be Cameron Newton, quarterback for the Carolina Panthers. Why is he my role model you might ask? Well, when you watch him on that field, you can see the passion in his eyes, and the adrenalin rushing through him. Newton has gone through rough times, is an all-time favorite to the crowd, and although he started off his NFL seasons with quite a bit of controversy, he lead the Panthers to a memorable path straight to Super Bowl 50. Reasons like this make his my role model.
Leadership is the ability of a person to influence people toward the attainment of a particular goal. Leadership is a people activity, not like administrative paper shuffling or problem solving. It is a dynamic force and involves the use of power. Out of the forces of leadership come four powerful characteristics: supportive, directive, participative, and achievement-oriented leadership. Although these types of characteristics are not considered ingrained personality traits, they reflect types of behavior every leader is able to adopt depending on the situation.
Servant Leadership describes a leadership style that focuses on serving the needs of the team, client or
Bell Hooks, shares many things that I can relate to in Teaching to Transgress, from the perspective as a father (teacher), husband (teacher), Uncle (teacher), Cousin, etc. Growing up in Philadelphia, I did not know how underprivileged my family was, since we were affluent in additional areas, it did not matter. However, I noticed it my second week of high school. Knowledge opened a completely new world for me and forced me to think critically and challenge everything that I read, hear, touch, and even taste. As a husband, if I am unable to lead, my family will perish. If I do not show enthusiasm while doing school projects with my 13-year-old, she will not have passion to pull from, and ultimately not succeed.
In the second millennium BCE astronomers in Babylon already knew about the circular motion of the sun and moon in the sky (Fig. 5.4) and about the Eastern concept of cyclical time. But the ancient image of the linear Time in Babylon and later in Greece, was supported by the observation of linear movement of the floats in water clocks (clepsydras) that were invariably used by all
Simply, servant leaders hold a view as a servant first and leader second (Owens & Hekman, 2012). Moreover, servant leaders emphasize personal responsibility for the organization and all internal and external stakeholders (Peterson, Galvin, & Lange, 2012). As stated, expressing a genuine concern and care for people are a basis of servant leadership. In addition, servant leadership also focuses on the growth of
An effective leader is someone who is passionate about their goals and knows how to motivate, inspire, and influence others to come together and work as one to reach a common goal and conduct compelling and important changes. The realization of some kind of qualitative or quantitative result because of the actions and influences of an organizations leader is essentially how to evaluate their effectiveness. The characteristics of effectiveness, of course, depend on the goals of the leader and the organization. The fundamental characteristics of what makes an effective leader are mostly universal, however, the characteristics of leader effectiveness from one organization to another may have unique
Effectiveness of leadership rest solely on the style of leadership that the leader embraces. Many times it is also contingent upon the framework of leadership. This simply suggests that dissimilar leadership styles are applicable in different situations. In order to be effective, one must possess an array of skills, influence, traits, behaviors, values, motivation and relationships with followers. Effectiveness of leadership is also the result of the mind, body, soul and spirit coming together to be a visionary, passionate, flexible, inspiring, innovative, courageous, experimental, and initiates change. Effective leadership means are centered on creating an invigorating environment that is safe, fair, and consistent for all. The aforementioned statements
The phrase “Servant Leadership” was coined by Robert K. Greenleaf in The Servant as a Leader, an essay he first published in 1970 ("What is servant," ). The servant leader serves first, while aspiring to lead second. The servant leader serves the people that he or she leads, implying employees are an end in themselves rather than a means to organizational purpose or bottom-line. Servant leadership is meant to replace a command and control, top-down, model of management. Servant leadership encourages collaboration, trust, foresight, listening, and the ethical use of power and empowerment. A few famous examples of servant leaders are George Washington, Gandi and Caesar Chavez.
Servant leadership is a type of leadership whereby the leader serves the needs of the people, empathizes with them, and involves them in solving their needs. Servant leadership is all about involving the people you are leading in your decision making, being ethical and caring for the people to enhance their personal growth at the same time improve their life. A servant leader does not simply delegate roles; he starts the work and energizes the others to join him and get the work done. According to Spears (2004), the servant leader as defined by Greenleaf is one who gets the natural feeling of wanting to serve first and then a conscious choice brings him/her to lead. This leader makes sure that other people’s highest-priority needs are take
If you could in your own words define a leader what would you say a leader was? A leader could be considered many different things depending on who you ask. According to Merriam Webster’s dictionary a leader is a person or thing who leads. That’s a pretty broad definition. Sanjiv Kumar defines leadership as the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of goals (Kumar, 2014). BusinessDictionary.com defines a leader as a person or thing that holds a dominant or superior position within its field, and is able to exercise a high degree of control or influence over others. Leaders can be found in every setting. Examples of leaders include parents, teachers, religious leaders, managers, or even a band director.
Servanthood is to serve the needs of the people in the best way possible and bring forth the greatness these individuals have to offer their community. Being a servant leader also means being selfless. Leaders are placed in certain organizations and a position to bring forth the calling and vision God has for His people. Servant leadership in it entity is to motivate and encourage individuals to turn away from self-serving. Wilkes, author of the book, Jesus on Leadership, says it the best, “A servant leader serves the mission and leads by serving those on the mission with him”
Servant leadership is basically a set of leadership practices and the philosophies regarding leadership. Surely most of us know what leadership really is. Leadership is seen simply as the accusation and exercise of power for someone who is on top of the pyramid. This is the conventional and simple form of leadership that we all know and love. Where on one hand there is the conventional form of leadership, the servant leader model is the form where the needs and concerns of others are put first. In this model, the needs and concerns of others are placed