Robin Hood: a fictional tale, a notorious thief, or a combination of both? Robin Hood is one of the most popular cultural folk heroes known to man. Although historians have ideas regarding the livelihood of Robin Hood, none of them can undeniably prove he actually existed. There are stories that differ in ways, and because of this he is still a mystery. People have an idea of where it all started, know the different names and tales that he consists of, and know what he is known as today, yet many still do not know fact from fiction. Before trying to put other pieces of the puzzle together, people must first consider where he actually came from. There are numerous theories about where Robin Hood actually lived and fought his battles. …show more content…
Depending on where people believe Robin Hood grew up, their ideas on what he did, and who he was differed. Once Robin Hood started to become a popular figure, people from all over the world started to become interested in him for different reasons. Depending on where they were from, they would pronounce his name differently, which caused there to be various spellings of his name. The earliest evidence that researchers could find that related to the name Robin Hood was Robert Hode. He had been an outlaw just like Robin Hood was described as, so he is seen as a likely option (History.com Staff). There were thirty-eight different original ballads made about Robin Hood in the fifteenth to the seventeenth century. None of them tell the real reason of why he is considered an outlaw, and they are all told a little different (Faiella #). Nowadays people cannot pinpoint what Robin Hood’s main goal in life was because there are multiple theories. In the 18th century chapbooks about Robin Hood were starting to become popular, and they usually were 24 pages long. People in the lower class bought more of them because it gave them hope, and showed that people were on their side (Buhle). Robin Hood is seen as a character of many trades, and has been classified as many different kinds of people. He is also seen as a fictional character to numerous people because of the lack of legal background on him. Robin Hood featured in many
He is looked upon in a heroic way for fighting the justice system and showing courage, strength and ability to resist laws through making his own lifestyle, with separate beliefs, attitudes and values. He was a friend of the poor, kind to women and children, and an enemy of the rich. He was forced into crime by the harsh harassments of the authorities. He said to have died bravely against the more powerful forces of the law. He has grown to be an admired infamous figure for the way he stood up to authority and his larrikin ways.
Pancho Villa redistributed the wealth gained from his illegal activities. He often took the money from the rich and gave it to the poor. These deeds led him to be known as a modern day Mexican Robin Hood.
Jesse James made history by making the first successful train robbery. This exchange drew attention to the infamous criminal and his gang. These high profile robberies influenced many writers to explore the idea of Jesse James being a romanticized hero, and a western folk hero.
“I had hope, however; I had been wounded seven times during the war, and once before in this same lung; and I did not believe I was going to die.” A fearless man with the courage to elude fellow companions, to commit thievery, and escape death so many times. Jesse James was a fearless man that had been affected by the Civil War. His contributions to a certain group made them the most feared groups over a couple years. This paper will cover his early life, contributions to the civil war, crime, personal life with his death, and how Robin Hood and James are alike/different.
Perceived as a hero by English and pirate by Spinards. The history on Drake is rather interesting. His fame is the product of his legendary expoits, leaving a memorarble trace in English history. His dynamic life and personal achievments have made him an iconic figure. respect among his contemporaries and more generations ahead.
This is what sets off the story line. If Robin didn’t take the job to steal 19 million from this guy, there would be no story. He steals the 19 million give to Sister Rachel and the kids. Robin is seen and Robin Hood to her, but to Beau Robin is seen a wastrel person! Beau becomes the bad guy and will do anything it takes to take out Robin Monarch for good.
Christopher Robin is a son of the author. As a child, he was basis character of Christopher in this father’s Winnie-the-Pooh stories in two of his books. Christopher is also a schizophrenic, his personality is a few mixtures of how he really is. He is young, friendly, playful, cheeky, imaginative, cute adventurous, heroic.
Robin Hood faces a myriad of problems that can potentially influence the changes that are crucial for Robin’s organization, as well as affect the effectiveness of the insurrection. As the CEO of his organization, Robin has the
Hook. Robin Hood (Library of Congress, 1886), by Paul Creswick, displays the life and death of the famous English legend, Robin Hood. He experiences many adventures throughout his years, being known by the authorities as a dangerous criminal, but being known by the people as a generous savior. Creswick demonstrates using characterization that the selfish qualities of humanity lead to the peril and death of justice.
Robin would love to have a family and settle down and live a normal life like most people do, but he does not think he can because he thinks there might be people who he has robbed that will take is family and either kill them or torture them, which something Robin would not want to risk anything at all” I want to have a simple life, but I don’t know if the life is meant for me” (Sullivan 202), this shows that he wants a family, but does not know if he would be ready to have one with his crazy schedule he has or the everyday job he would have to settle for, which he thinks would bore him to death. His other decision is to keep on doing what he is doing, which makes him happy with all the kids he is helping, which is what he is somewhat leaning towards because less of a chance less people he loves will get harmed and if he stops the life he has right now who will fund the orphanage/ hospital, which he does not want to leave it up to other people to help out with. Robin debating about his future shows that he is searching for an
This change was completely unnecessary for the movie. Robin Hood is a character that at some point must face violence just like the rest of his “Merry Men” so you can expect for things like killing, some drinking (alcohol), and of course smoking. The original Robin Hood stories were full of violence and non kid friendly things. This change in the prince of thieves movie is like “Disneyfication”. “The Prince Of Thieves” movie is supposed to be the closest we have to the original stories of Robin Hood but if we keep altering him like this then the main character will not be the same and could mess the story up
Sacrificing of money for people who are suffering from poverty it is the awesome deal but only when their benefactor (благодеятель) their legal owner. In the opposite situation even if you are following the best and cleanest motives the fine line between your dark and light side can start blurring unavoidable. Definitely some people were punishment and robbed by Robin Hood just, but who knows how many of them could earn their treasures using only hard work and can become his victims dishonestly. Being in a role of karma wheel Robin Hood increased level of life for some poor people but decreased it for rich. Ultimately, giving the answer on the question was he criminal or not I can say that from the juridical side of view – yes, he was. But
Robin and the Merrymen is a company who are in business to steal from the rich and give to the poor. The organization had begun as a personal interest to Robin, and has grown with allies and new recruits to become a very large organization. Robin is the head of all operations with few delegates who have their own specific duties.
Robin Hood was not a thief. He was simply taking what was stolen from the common people and giving it back to them. The leader of the country was the true thief. He charged outrageous taxes that the people could barely pay, and oppressed them when they could not pay it. (“Robin Hood: The Folk Hero” 2). This is what makes him a thief. Charging outrageous taxes that almost no one can pay is unnecessarily and maliciously taking something that belongs to someone else for your own benefit.
Robinhood should not recruit new men in his group and should rather diversify. He shouldprovide his men with funds and support to become merchants and trader. The group thusformed should be supported and hence they can use their power to threat other merchantsas well as the prince.