D. Non-Disparagement. From the date of execution of this Settlement Agreement forward, Plaintiff, Releasors and their legal counsel agree not to defame the Released Parties or any of their current or former employees, affiliated corporations, parent corporations, partnerships, divisions and subsidiaries, and their officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents, attorneys, insurers, successors and assigns, or any of Released Parties’ services or products, in any matter, at any time, to any person or entity. Plaintiff, Releasors and their legal counsel further agree to refrain from making defamatory statements, oral or written, about any of the Released Parties (and their products or services), including but not limited to …show more content…
E. Releasors understand and agree that the payments specifically identified herein are the entire and only consideration for this Full Release and Settlement Agreement, and it is intended by Releasors and the Released Parties, and each of them, that this release shall be complete and shall not be subject to any claim of mistake of fact or law by Releasors and that it expresses a full and complete settlement of liability claimed and denied, and that this release is intended to be full, final, and complete. F. As part of the consideration for the payments hereinabove mentioned, Releasors are releasing all claims, including all those for known or unknown and anticipated or unanticipated injuries and damages arising out of or in any way relating to the Incident, including all interest, attorney’s fees and expenses, if any, medical expenses, hospital expenses, medical liens, and other related fees and expenses arising from and/or in connection with the Incident. Releasors recognize and acknowledge that there is a risk that, subsequent to the execution of this Full Release and Settlement Agreement, Releasors will claim or suffer monetary or other losses, expenses, or damages which they may allege are in some way caused by or related to the Incident, but which are unknown and
Charles and Joann Yankitis (hereinafter “Yankitis”), the Bakers, LIA and the individual board members of LIA would enter into a mutual release regarding any and all claims relating to the above referenced lawsuit, whether known or unknown, arising out of any act or occurrence prior to the date of the settlement agreement. The parties would enter an order dismissing Macomb County Circuit Court Case No. 15-159-CH with prejudice and without attorney’s fees or costs to any of the parties.
Each Party enters into this release knowing that there may be unknown claims which it is releasing and waiving by executing this
Jefferson will agree to defend, hold harmless and indemnify Spinnaker and its agents from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, damages, liabilities, losses, settlements, judgments, costs or attorney’s fees that were made by any predecessor “Administrator” or “Declarant” under the
Laurence Kaye (“Kaye”), appellant, an attorney, represented Linda Wilson-Gaskins (“Wilson-Gaskins”), appellee, in a wrongful termination lawsuit filed against Wilson-Gaskins’s former employer, Government Employees Insurance Co. (“GEICO”). Following that representation, Wilson-Gaskins filed a complaint against Kaye alleging “legal malpractice.” The Circuit Court for Montgomery County granted summary judgment in favor of Kaye and dismissed Wilson-Gaskins’s complaint. Wilson-Gaskins appealed the dismissal of her claim. We affirmed the judgment of the Circuit Court and held that Wilson-Gaskins failed to make a prima facie case for professional negligence. We further held that a release contained in a settlement agreement between the parties
I believe that our company stands to lose a lot as a result of a successful suit against us by Ms. Pollard. We have reason to believe that if these actions are taken to court, we will find it difficult to deny the allegations and defend ourselves in
Deb buys a song through eSongs, an online music vendor. Before completing the purchase and downloading the song, Deb must review a provision stating that she will not make and sell copies of the song and is required to click “I agree.” This provision is
Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that each of the Defendants was the agent and employee of each of the remaining Defendants and was at all times acting within the purpose and scope of such agency and employment.
Whereas, the District’s participation in this Agreement is not an admission of liability but is an attempt to bring closure to disputed issues; and
Mr. and Mrs. Tim and Natalie McGrew and on behalf of L.M., and any and all of their successors, heirs, and assigns, agree that this Agreement shall be deemed a full and complete settlement, release, and waiver of any and all existing legal claims asserted and unasserted by Parents, L.M., and each of them, against District, its board members, agents, officers, attorneys, and employees, past and present, through and including the date this Agreement is fully executed. This Agreement does not extend to any potential future claims and all Parties to this Agreement retain all rights they may have under state and federal law for future claims.
WHEREAS, the Parties have concluded that this Agreement is a fair, reasonable and adequate resolution of all Claims that have been made, or could have been made in the Suit; and
In this case, many laws and amendments do fall of this suit in which to make parties seeking to be made whole. Each one has to be viewed and applied to the case in the way it is written to make a party whole and responsible party take ownership of wrong.
If and after reviewing all the reports and facts presented, the Commissioner concurs with the recommendation for termination, the probationary officer will be
state prosecutor. (Lippman, 2007) The purpose of the civil action is to compensate you with
(b) Subject to compensation, the amount of which and the time and manner of payment of which have either been agreed to by those affected or decided or approved by a court.