preview

A Rostrata Hypothesis

Decent Essays

Based on the results, the study hypothesis was supported. The force production was determined by A.rostrata during terrestrial and aquatic locomotion using their axial locomotion. During the many trials, A.rostrata used different parts of the body to push off the substrate. However, the prediction was wrong. Originally it was expected that force production will be greater in terrestrial environments. But the data collected confirms that there was greater force production in aquatic environments. For the resultant force, aquatic environments mean was a 1.8 and terrestrial environment mean was 1.6. For the force/mass , the mean for aquatic was 0.18 and terrestrial mean was 0.02. Lastly, for the total force, the mean for aquatic environment was 2.85 and the mean for was 2.63. Therefore, the resultant …show more content…

One reason is A.rostrata used more of its full body to push off the peg in the aquatic setting compared to terrestrial. While observing the species during terrestrial trials, the eel had more “half pushes” than full body pushes. Either using the the anterior and posterior end. Specifically at times, they would use their head and tail to push off the substrate. Another reason is the difference of pressure or energy used in water compared to on land. On land, there would have to be more force to push an object. Whereas, in water an individual can use less force to push an object. In a previous study, researchers Ellerby and colleagues (2001) examines the fast muscle in Anguilla anguilla during aquatic and terrestrial locomotion. Ellerby et al. (2001) noticed that the stimulus patterns in the muscles that are linked to swimming create a stronger force and power than terrestrial crawling. The reason there is a less muscle performance on land is due to the possibility the eel is restricted from a particular kinematic pattern that is needed to push from a

Get Access