Criteria for a Great Story
Every writer has a standard to meet while writing their stories. Sometimes these standards are not met. Sometimes they are exactly like the author planned. In “A Rose for Emily”, by William Faulkner, Faulkner met the standards that are stated in his Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech. In William Faulkner’s short story, he fulfills the criteria he proclaims in his speech that good writers must have plot, characters, and theme.
Faulkner says that the story needs compassion, pity, and a conflict of heart in order to be successfully written. The plot helps the reader feel compassion and pity. The conflict occurs when Miss Emily’s father died. When Miss Emily’s father died, all she had was a big empty house to herself. Her father did not like her fiancé or any other guy in that sense. Her father was the only guy left in her life. When he died, the whole town felt pity for Miss Emily. The narrator says, “When her father died, it got about that the house was all that was left to her; and in a way, people were glad” (Faulkner 821). Miss Emily claimed her father was
…show more content…
Even though Miss Emily killed Mr. Barron, the citizens still paid their respects. The stench from the house was understood to be the dead body of Mr. Barron. Even though the citizens did not approve of the relationship between the two, the whole town supported her. They felt compassion and pity for Mrs. Emily. They showed love by standing beside her through tough times. These are all reasons that the theme met Faulkner’s goal in his speech.
In William Faulkner’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech, he met every goal he stated. New generations of writers should try and meet these goals. We need to write about problems of the spirit. “ A Rose for Emily” shows love, honor, pity, pride, compassion, and sacrifice. The plot shows pride and compassion, and the theme shows glory. William Faulkner is an example authors should strive to
Desperation for love arising from detachment can lead to extreme measures and destructive actions as exhibited by the tumultuous relationships of Miss Emily in William Faulkner's “A Rose for Emily” (rpt. in Thomas R. Arp and Greg Johnson, Perrine's Literature: Structure, Sound, and Sense, 9th ed. [Boston: Wadsworth, 2006] 556). Miss Emily is confined from society for the majority of her life by her father, so after he has died, she longs for relations that ironically her longing destroys. The despondency and obsession exuded throughout the story portray the predicament at hand.
If we compare William Faulkner's two short stories, 'A Rose for Emily' and 'Barn Burning', he structures the plots of these two stories differently. However, both of the stories note the effect of a father¡¦s teaching, and in both the protagonists Miss Emily and Sarty make their own decisions about their lives. The stories present major idea through symbolism that includes strong metaphorical meaning. Both stories affect my thinking of life.
Faulkner used a setting and time to show Emily had a hard time accepting change and moving on with her life. They story took place right after the Civil War. Most African Americans were loathed and discriminated but Emily was relived from her father. Money showed a social statement back then and Emily’s father had money. Since her father loaned the town money she had become a well appreciated woman even after his passing. In stated in the story, “she had chosen not to come out of the house and when the townspeople had saw her they seen a different Emily.” As stated in the book
In "A Rose for Emily," William Faulkner's use of setting and characterization foreshadows and builds up to the climax of the story. His use of metaphors prepares the reader for the bittersweet ending. A theme of respectability and the loss of, is threaded throughout the story. Appropriately, the story begins with death, flashes back to the past and hints towards the demise of a woman and the traditions of the past she personifies. Faulkner has carefully crafted a multi-layered masterpiece, and he uses setting, characterization, and theme to move it along.
William Faulkner came from a well-respected family line. His grandfather being a Civil War Hero and his father being the treasurer of the University of Mississippi. He worked in Hollywood to make a living and was awarded a Noble Prize in Literature in 1950. An analysis of William Faulkner, “A Rose for Emily” shows Faulkner build suspense in three different techniques, Miss Emily refusing her father’s death, the purchase of arsenic, and the smell of the house. Faulkner’s built suspense worked because it gave the reader a discovery to unravel while reading the story.
In “A Rose For Emily”, by William Faulkner, plot plays an important role in how
Faulkner, William.”A Rose for Emily”. Literature: An Introduction to Reading and Writing. Eds.Edgar V. Roberts and Robert Zweig. 10th ed. Boston: Longman, 2012. 91-96.
In a long critical analysis, Terry Heller asserts that although Faulkner’s emphasizes the difficulty of accepting change, they are other ideals that influence the way this short story is perceived. Heller argues that since the publication of this story, Miss Emily Grierson has either been sympathized or hated by the readers. He descriptively comments how the townspeople claimed to feel sympathy towards Emily but in reality never reached out to her to help her overcome her loses. Heller mentions that Faulkner highlights “what the town [felt], the things the town [said], [believed], and [did],” in order to help the reader realize that they are incorrect about the assumptions they make concerning Emily. Heller claims that the town’s actions reveal
The story “A Rose for Emily” by William Faulkner would be drastically different if it was written from the point of view of Miss Emily. Her intentions and thoughts would be more pronounced, and because of this, the ending of the story may not come as such a shock. In addition, Miss Emily would be less distanced from the audience, and they would be able to understand her character in a way that the townspeople could not. Miss Emily being the narrator would immensely change the reader’s perception of the story’s ending and her character.
As any reader can see, " A Rose for Emily" is one of the most authentic short stories by Faulkner. His use of characterization, narration, foreshadowing, and symbolism are four key factors to why Faulkner's work is idealistic to all readers.
People who read about William Faulkner (1897-1962) know that he did not lead an easy life. He had the bad habit of drinking way too much, but above all he was very lonely. In his short story “A Rose For Emily,” Emily becomes very important because it represents in some way Faulkner himself. Even though she was perceived as an idol from the town, she felt very lonely.
William Faulkner at one point stated that if he were offered a chance to choose between grief and nothing, he would have chosen grief (Volpe 187). He additional clarifies why he would do this through the story “A Rose for Emily”. However, the story is not about Faulkner but a lonely, selfish and poor woman, Emily Greirson. Emily is incapable of coming to terms with the notion of death and as a consequence suffers an immense deal of denunciation (Anderson 89). While the town folk anticipated that she would grieve upon her father’s demise, she is not. However, she goes on to claim that her father is okay and alive. Faulkner’s notion of anguish is lucid in this story as he shows the readers that it is worth acknowledging death than disregarding it through Emily’s life (Claridge 59). Faulkner’s story is set in the South, during the racial discrimination and key political shift epoch.
William Faulkner begins the story by telling of the death of Miss Emily Grierson. The people in the town went to Emily’s funeral not because they admired her or had love and affection for her, but mainly out of curiosity. The women could not wait to see the inside of the house, everyone knew that when her father died he only left her with the house, in other words Emily was a pauper.
The story represented to all show an easy-going, relaxed attitude that works perfectly to support its theme concerning the madness of modern life. Faulkner’s division in the story helped to organized the events surrounding Miss Emily’s life supports the story direction and events preceding her death, five sections. The town sees and knows and tells the story for Miss Emily. Miss Emily is dead at the very beginning of the story, but Faulkner paints a picture of a strong reputable
What is going to be analyzed in this paper are the two short stories by W. Faulkner 'A Rose for Emily' and 'Dry September'. Basically, what is to be performed is a comparison/contrast analysis in terms of the writing style and character presentation. More specifically, I will provide first the information from the story 'A Rose for Emily', concerning writing style and character presentation, and following is going to be the same analysis for the other story 'Dry September'. After the necessary data are provided, there is going to be a comparison/contrast of these data, by also citing passages