preview

A Rhetorical Analysis Of The Collective Wisdom By Herbert Spencer

Decent Essays

In “The Collective Wisdom”, Herbert Spencer passionately refutes several of the House of Commons’ reasons to oppose the Cheltenham Water Bill. Spencer makes clear points concerning the logical fallacies that the House of Commons based their decision on. This fully convinced the audience of the logic behind his position. Spencer first points out the logical fallacies in the Times paragraph. This paragraph stated, “such a measure, if carried out, will diminish the water of that noble river a million gallons per day.” At first glance, this is quite an alarming statement to the public and the members of the House of Commons. However, Spencer clarifies this statement through a comparison. He states that, “The simple fact is that the current of the Thames, above the point at which the tides influence it, discharge in twenty- …show more content…

It was stated in the House of Commons that, “the proportion of sewage to pure water would be seriously increased” if surrounding towns were allowed to tap into the springs. Spencer clarifies this claim through his use of an additional logical comparison. Spencer states, “Taking a minute out of twelve hours would be taking as large a proportion as the Cheltenham people with to take from the Thames.” This time comparison puts the lack of a problem into perspective. Moreover, Spencer is able to look at the situation with a logical view instead of only stating direct facts. A further error pointed out and corrected by Spencer is this quote from the House of Commons, stating that to let the Cheltenham have this quantity would be “to rob the towns along the banks of the Thames of their rights.” Spencer is able to refute this assertion by pointing out that 999 parts of the Thames out of 1,000 pass by unused. Therefore, it is clear that the proportion of sewage in the Thames is minuscule. Finally, Spencer is able to display that the report falsely exhibits

Get Access