Readers might recall that last year I wrote an article entitled “A Lesson in Constitutional Law for the SU”, in which I pointed out the numerous flaws within the Student Union (SU) Constitution and the ways in which the SU, under former SU President Keiran Carpen and former Vice President Jonathan (now Ares) Aung, repeatedly violated and ignored that constitution. Subsequently, the SU Constitution became an issue in the Student Union elections as several candidates promised to amend it and to start adhering to it. The article was even quoted by SU presidential candidates during the SU debate. On September 18, the SU, with Aung as President, met behind closed doors to amend the current constitution. If anyone should be happy that the SU tried to fix our Constitution it should be me, but I’m not. In fact, I am disappointed and a little bit angry, because the only thing that the SU succeeded in doing was making the Student Union worse and doing so in the most undemocratic way possible. First and foremost the amendments to the SU Constitution do little if anything to address the numerous problems that plagued the Constitution. The largest flaw in the old Constitution was the inordinate amount of power granted to the SU President, by allowing him to singlehandedly appoint a majority of the members of the Executive Council, the SU’s chief legislative body. The fact that the SU President was and is allowed to appoint anyone to these positions without any oversight means that these
Monsters are everywhere, always lurking in the shadows. Tyranny is one of those monsters. He is harsh absolute power in the hands of an individual or group. Rebels defeated tyranny but he is still out there watching, waiting to strike. This isn’t a fairytale where everyone lives happily ever after but a nightmare. In Philadelphia somewhere in May 1787 delegates from all over the states arrived to have the constitutional convention. Here the constitution was born and this historical document is still in play today. The constitution is a written plan that provides the basic framework of a government and the delegates are people sent to represent their state. It was finally ratified by all 13 states in 1889-90. So how does the constitution guard
What court will have jurisdiction over Tanya's suit? Why? The most likely court with jurisdiction over Tanya's suit will be the federal court in the state of Confusion. That is because Tanya's suit raises a federal issue, that of the regulation of interstate commerce. Generally, such a case would be filed in the federal court in the same state where the alleged harm manifested itself. However, there is also a possibility that Tanya could seek to use the concept of "long-arm" jurisdiction (Nowak & Rotunda, 2007) to have the case adjudicated in the federal court in Denial based on the fact that the illegal regulation in Confusion affected some of the residents of the state of Denial, irrespective of where the harm was caused.
The Constitution was made to avoid tyranny. They wanted to create a government that avoids having too much power to a person or a group. They also wanted to create a government that wasn’t to weak to support the nation. The Constitution guards against tyranny by creating checks over the branches, giving power to the central government and the states, and creating the three branches separate and distinct.
Picture yourself in an environment that only a dictator can rule and vote only for his state. None of your votes counts without a significant amount of people to share your votes with. Which creates a tyranny that will destroy the whole state, which will not be fair for the people living there. On May 1787 in Philadelphia, 55 individual calls for a constitutional convention. They are mostly wealthy white mens. In this case, James Madison and his fellow delegates challenge to write a constitution that was strong enough to hold the states and the people together without letting any person, group or branches of government gain too much control. The Articles of Confederation was to weak and wasn’t working so that’s why they meet for the constitutional
The chapter wraps up with detailed coverage of the ambitious revision effort in the 1970s and more recent attempts at constitutional change. In general these revision efforts have failed, but they did lead to some important, if incremental, reforms. Learning why and how they
The United States of America is defined as “ The land of The Free”. In this strong and well built nation we don’t have to worry about tyranny . Tyranny is what you would call a nation under cruel and oppressive government. The constitution guards against tyranny because we the people want our rights as well as a sturdy, fair and an equitable government. Madison stated, “ The challenge was to write a constitution that was strong enough to hold the people together without letting anyone person, or group,or branch, or level of government gain too much control,” (Background).
High taxes. High tension. A society breaks away from an absolute leader who has been ruthlessly running their lives with cruel and unjust tactics. A government built on bribery of judges and occupation of populated villages begins to crumble as the one wearing the crown of absolute power loses his colonist pawns and they become independent and determined to found their own country and defend what they believe in. Tyranny is what drove our great nation to be formed, and what drove the most appreciated American patriots to make sure it could never be probable in their young new country. How did they do it? They created The Constitution. This document was written to establish a structured framework for the government of their country. It was
In 1783, the Americans triumphed in the American Revolution, which granted independence from Great Britain. After their victory, it became evident that the new country would need a secure and central government to thrive. The Constitution is a document formed to aid the new republic and ensure that it would become and remain stable. It gives a complete and thorough outline of the rights that all citizens are entitled to have. However, prior to the ratification of the Constitution there had to be many debates and factors that influenced the idea of such a document that would form the basis for the United States. The creation of the Constitution was a result of America’s perseverance through certain political, economic, and social issues of the 1780s. Even through the unfavorable circumstances, America was able to devise a doctrine that would become to be known as the basis for the greatest country in the world; the US
3Answer: First allowed citizen to speak against the constitution, 10 amendment is reserved the right to the people
The Virginia Plan was the proposal to create a strong national government and which had a bicameral legislature. The New Jersey Plan was a proposal to create a weak national government and had a unicameral legislature. The Great Compromise was a plan to have a house elected based on state population and a state selected Senate with new members for each state.
he Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, Federal Laws constitute the supreme law of the land. All state courts are bound by the supreme law. If the conflict between federal and state laws, the federal law overrules. The states must stay within the boundaries of the Constitution and Federal Laws. This makes the Supremacy Clause the cornerstone of the U.S.A. You review the local laws in your state. http://statelaws.findlaw.com/
The United Bill of Rights is perhaps one of the most important pieces of constitutional legislature that protects the rights of the individual to freedom, liberty, and personal autonomy by limiting the powers of the federal government. While most people and the media discussions surrounding the Bill of Rights usually clusters around the 1st and 2nd Amendments, the 7th Amendment is also an integral component in limiting federal power, which aids in transferring the power of government from the concentrated hands of a few to instead the people. However, the 7th Amendment plays a less significant role in affecting the day to day lives of the average American in today 's time than it did when the Bill of Rights was initially ratified in 1791.
The rule of law is seen as being one of the most fundamental components of the UK constitution as well as being a principle that is concerned with restricting parliamentary action. Though the rule of law is seen to be a component in the constitution; the actual meaning of the rule of law has been very problematic to interpret. This is considerably down to the fact that it means different things to different people as since the nineteenth century, academics, politicians and judges have proposed diverse definitions and explanations in regards to the rule of law and the role it upholds in the UK constitution.
The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the United States of America which defines the structure of national government and dictates the capacity of its powers and limitations. The U.S. Constitution maintains its purpose as the fundamental application of law in the United States where all other laws are measured against it. Furthermore, the Guarantee Clause of Article 4 specifies each state to maintain a degree of sovereignty over its own forms of government (U.S. Const. art. IV, § 4). State constitutions mirror the design of the federal constitution and contain extended provisions of the U.S. Constitution.
The most important trait of being an effective citizen is respecting others and obeying the Constitution because it creates our three branches of government and is able for amending. Everyone as a citizen of the US should obey the Constitution. Obeying the Constitution can avoid consequences. By not obeying the Constitution and respecting people we are not obeying our unalienable rights. Our unalienable rights are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and by disrespecting others you are not letting other people have their pursuit of happiness as well. We are living in a civilized world where people should cooperate with each other. Respecting people is a silent way to express your feeling toward them. Respect is an unspoken way of communication,