preview

A Civil Action: Anne Anderson Vs. Cryovac, Inc.

Decent Essays

A Civil Action – Reaction Paper A civil action covers the case of Anne Anderson, et al., v. Cryovac, Inc., et al. It deals with the negligence in regards to the proper storage, disposal and handling of trichloroethylene, which is an industrial solvent and had contaminated the town’s local aquifer. The movie is based on a nonfiction book that cover the case and provides more details in regards. Though Travolta’s character lost his case, in the end, the Environmental Protection Agency, used the information from the case to eventually prosecute the companies responsible for the spill and had them clean up. The central plot of this movie is focused on the case and the outcome and interworking parts of the judicial process. A key failure of the tanneries, was the improper way in which they handled the hazardous chemicals used at their factories. There is a clear case for negligence by the tannery, it was their duty to ensure that the proper regulations for the disposal and storage of all hazardous wastes, both created and used in the process of manufacturing and normal operations. In the case of the numerous cases of sicknesses occurring …show more content…

While initially Travolta’s character sees the case as a chance to increase his firm’s reputation, through the duration of the movie, his involvement reaches a clearly desperate level as we see him bet his firm on the case, and ends up losing it. The tanneries’ lawyer view the victims not as people, trying to avoid the human aspect in the trials. Travolta on the other hand wisely uses this aspect in his argument. The case held one of importance not only due to the health issues but also due to the fact that the tanneries were the source of numerous jobs. This could be used to influence people and whether they would be willing to testify due to the possibility of driving jobs away or facing consequences at

Get Access